Home

 

FEATURED STORY

 

 

REPORTS

 

 

DAILY NEWS

Clients

Testimonials

Contact Us

CHAT
FOLLOW
BLOG
ChatRoom

Physician Pay: A Big Driver of Health Care Costs?

Forbes, January 19, 2011

 

With all the discussion in this country about the 1% vs the 99%, it is a good time to address a question about physician pay & how this affects health care costs.

 

Are Medicare Advantage Plans Cherry Picking Healthier Members?

Fierce Health Payer, January 13, 2012

 

Medicare Advantage plans may be indirectly cherry picking healthier seniors--and therefore decreasing their coverage costs--by offering benefits such as gym memberships, suggested a New England Journal of Medicine study.

 

ACP Aims to Limit Excessive Testing

Fierce Practice Management, January 4, 2012

 

Both physicians and patients should use a more critical eye in determining whether certain diagnostic tests might do more harm than good.

 

California Adds Patients to Health Insurance Rolls

LA Times, January 3, 2012

 

Despite a slow start, California's push to extend health coverage to those with preexisting medical conditions — a three-year stopgap effort until federal healthcare reform fully kicks in — has enrolled more than 6,000 patients.

 

New Year to Bring New rules on e-Prescriptions, Pill Mills

USA Today, December 31, 2011

 

Come Jan. 1, physician Carl E. Mitchell knows he will face a 1% cut in payments he gets for seeing Medicare patients.

 

Kaiser Pays Cash When Members Lose Weight

The Washington Post, December 27, 2011

 

Kaiser Permanente of Colorado hopes a new incentive--cold, hard cash--will motivate people to lose weight.

 

CMS Proposes Sunshine Rules on Industry Payments, Gifts to Doctors

Amednews, December 26, 2011

 

Drug and device manufacturers would be required to disclose payments & gifts they give to physicians beginning in 2013.

 

Why Patients are Turning Less to Media and Friends for Health Information

Amednews, December 26, 2011

 

As patient visits to physicians have declined, so has their interest in finding information relating to their health.

 

Senate Measure Delays Medicare Physicians' 27.4% Payment Cut

Insurance News Net, December 20, 2011

 

The U.S. Senate has passed a measure that delays by two months a 27.4% payment cut from the federal government to doctors who provide medical care to seniors enrolled in the Medicare program.

 

How States are Keeping Doctors From Moving Out

Amednews, December 19, 2011

 

Widespread concerns about physician shortages have many states working to keep doctors trained in medical schools and residency programs there from crossing state lines to practice medicine.

 

ACA Helps 32 Health Systems Improve Care For Patients, Saving Up To $1.1 Billion

HHS.gov, December 19, 2011

 

32 leading health care organizations from across the country will participate in a new Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations initiative made possible by the Affordable Care Act.

 

How to Handle Sticky Social Media Situations

Fierce Practice Management, December 14, 2011

 

Almost universally when speaking to physicians and healthcare administrators, social media is seen from the perspective of risk & fear.

 

Unreasonable Rate Review for Health Insurance

Forbes, December 13, 2011

 

If you want to get an understanding of how the health reform law works, both in theory and practice, it would be a good idea to take a look at the process called “rate review.”

 

Doctors' Legal Remedies Can Defeat Online Attacks

Amednews, December 12, 2011

 

"Horrible results!" "The doctor misdiagnosed the case." "It was a failed surgery." When unhappy patients post these kinds of comments about physicians online.

 

3 Tactics to Take Control of Payer Reimbursement

Fierce Practice Management, December 7, 2011

 

As demonstrated by the more than 4,700 recent physician remarks about their relations with payers, physicians believe that insurers strive to wear them down.

 

Patient Satisfaction Scores Could be Swayed by 'Nocebo Effect

Fierce Healthcare, December 5, 2011

 

Patient satisfaction reporting could be affected by the "nocebo effect"--the opposite of the placebo effect--in which patients have low expectations and report low outcomes.

 

Physicians Uncertain About Taking Part in ACOs

Amednews, December 5, 2011

 

Many physicians are familiar with accountable care organizations as a concept, but some are either opting out of them or are unsure whether they will participate, according to a recent survey.

 

MLR Final Rule: Insurers Must Disclose Healthcare Spending

Fierce Health Payer, December 2, 2011

 

Even if insurers meet the MLR threshold, they will still have to explain to consumers how their premium dollars are spent under the final MLR rule released Dec. 2 by the HHS.

 

Medical Loss Ratio: Getting Your Money's Worth on Health Insurance

CMS, December 2, 2011

 

Final Rule Fact Sheet.

 

ACOs Are Bursting Out All Over

Kaiser Health News, December 1, 2011

 

Accountable Care Organizations are the hot new health care trend, and there’s a new study out by Leavitt Partners trying to quantify just how hot they really are.

 

HIPAA 5010 Grace Period Doesn't Let Practices Off The Hook

Fierce Practice Management, November 30, 2011

 

The CMS’s recently announced 90-day discretionary enforcement period (March 21 vs Jan. 1) for physicians to transition to HIPAA Version 5010 for claims transmission.

 

Efficient Claims Handling: A Gift That Keeps on Giving

Amednews, November 14, 2011

 

As the nation heads into the year-end holiday season, the AMA wants more physicians to give themselves the gift of an improved, streamlined insurance claims process.

 

11 Insurers Must Refund $114M For Overcharging Premiums

Fierce Health Payer, November 11, 2011

 

11 insurance companies operating in NY, including Aetna, UnitedHealth & WellPoint, must refund a total of $114.5 million to policyholders who were overcharged for health insurance premiums last year.

 

Physician Social Media Users Say ROI is Real

Fierce Practice Management, November 9, 2011

 

By investing 90 minutes per week to reaching patients via Twitter, YouTube, Google+, and three Facebook accounts, Dr. Vandna Jerath said she's been able to build her credibility and build a bond with patients before they ever step through the door to her office.

 

Study Raises Questions About ‘Bundling’ To Pay Doctors

Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2011

 

There’s a lot of concern today that paying fees to medical providers for each service may lead to unnecessary care.

 

The U.S. Needs a Health-Care Revolution Now

Marketwatch.com, November 7, 2011

 

Health care needs a total revolution so it starts promoting and paying for health instead of disease. That’s the conclusion Dr. Walter Bortz has come to after writing 150 scientific articles.

 

Health Investors' New Calculus: Save Money To Make Money

Kaiser Health News, November 6, 2011

 

Over the last two decades, venture capitalists helped make possible striking advances in health care, including robotic surgery, cancer vaccines and genomics.

 

Docs Need Training in Cost Awareness

Healthcare Finance, November 4, 2011

 

Healthcare costs are in a constant state of expansion yet physicians do not understand how much the care they recommend costs and they are not getting the training they should have so that they will understand those costs.

 

Decline in Doctor Office Visits Could be Permanent

Amednews, October 31, 2011

 

Studies suggest recent declines reflect cost-conscious patients training themselves to avoid making an appointment unless they believe it's absolutely necessary.

 

AMA Launches Online Group For E-Claims

Amednews, October 31, 2011

 

The AMA has launched an online group for practices, payers & others who want to share tips, questions & success stories related to getting claims processed & paid electronically.

 

Medicare Has a Drug Problem

The Washington Post, October 28, 2011

 

Perhaps no part of Medicare has done as well in reining in costs as Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit, signed into law by President G W. Bush in 2003.

 

Rise in Medicare Premium Is Lower Than Predicted

The New York Times, October 27, 2011

 

Monthly Medicare premiums for most beneficiaries will rise next year by $3.50, to $99.90, a much smaller increase than had been expected.

 

Medicare: How Much More Will They Cut?

Money Magazine, October 21, 2011

 

For all the chatter about how politicians have to buckle down and get serious about reining in Medicare, you might have missed this development.

 

Younger Doctors Not as Pro-Vaccine as Older Docs

LA Times, October 20, 2011

 

While many practices struggle to convince parents that vaccinating their children is safe & necessary, new research indicates younger physicians may not be fully sold on that message.

 

8 Things to Know About the ACO Final Rule

Becker’s Hospital Review, October 20, 2011

 

The HHS today released its final rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program, which involves the establishment of accountable care organizations and is set to take effect Jan. 1, 2012.

 

Inexpensive Alternatives to EHRs

Physicians Practice, October 19 2011

 

First, let's define "inexpensive." According to the AMA, the average cost of an EHR, per physician is $50,000. That includes hardware, software & training, of course, but it is still a hefty investment.

 

Senior Leadership Should Support ACOs, Then Take Backseat

Fierce Health Payer, October 18, 2011

 

To be successful in developing and implementing ACOs, senior leaders must buy into the collaborative care model, but they also should take a backseat & let others drive.

 

Physician Pay Increases Expected to Regress in 2012

Becker’s Hospital Review, October 18, 2011

 

Physicians across all types of healthcare organizations can expect their salary increases to be around 2.5% in 2012.

 

Professional Mystery Patient Tells All

Fierce Practice Management, October 17, 2011

 

If you've ever posed as or hired a mystery patient at your practice, you've likely gained valuable insights into how your office could provide better customer service.

 

Aetna Exclusive: How IT Tools Cut Costs, Improve Payer-Provider Transactions

Fierce Health Payer, October 17, 2011

 

Thanks to mandates that establish administrative cost caps on payers, the customary transaction processes between providers and payers are no longer practical.

 

Facebook, Twitter Users Have Few Nice Things to Say About Health Insurers

Amednews, October 17, 2011

 

Among the posts analyzed by a social media reputation-assessment firm, only 30% are positive.

 

Private Health Exchanges on the Rise

Washington Post, October 10, 2011

 

As far as building blocks of the health reform law go, the insurance exchanges are pretty crucial. They’re the health insurance marketplaces that every state will have in 2014, where individuals and small businesses can compare and purchase plans.

 

Column: Don't Blame Doctors For High Health Care Costs

USA Today, October 10, 2011

 

The Kaiser Family Foundation released recently its latest estimate of what health insurance will cost in the future. By 2021, average family premiums are set to double, to more than $32,000.

 

What to Say When Patients Haggle Over Their Bills

Amednews, October 10, 2011

 

"Doctor, can you lower that bill?" How patients negotiate payments with their physicians has been the subject of numerous stories in the media.

 

Pain Management For Practice Breakups

Amed news, October 10, 2011

 

Attorney John Fanburg likes to say that medical partnerships are "marriages without love." He should know, as part of what keeps him busy is helping medical practices divorce as peacefully as possible.

 

Medical Crisis in America: Why One Doctor Quit

The Fiscal Times, October 8, 2011

 

PCPs in America are struggling with what is & what will be: a broken health care system & the coming influx of aging baby boomers.

 

Feds to Design Health Insurance For The Masses

Chron, October 7, 2011

 

The federal government is taking on a crucial new role in the nation's health care, designing a basic benefits package for millions of privately insured Americans.

 

40% of Medicare Spending on Common Cancer Screenings Unnecessary, Probe Suggest

Iwatch, October 7, 2011

 

Cancer screening tests are vastly overused in the US, with about 40% of Medicare spending on common preventive screenings regarded as medically unnecessary.

 

Payers Pay Up: 6 Recent Fines on Insurers

Fierce Health Payer, October 7, 2011

 

Health insurers are no strangers to fines & other disciplinary actions. Payers this year have felt increasing pressure from state insurance departments to improve efficiency and quality or pay the price.

 

More People Using Free Preventive Benefits Provided by ACA

HHS.gov, October 6, 2011

 

The CMS reported today nearly 20.5 million people with Medicare reviewed their health status at a free Annual Wellness Visit or received other preventive services with no deductible or cost sharing this year.

 

In Health Insurance, What Counts as ‘Essential’?

The Washington Post, October 4, 2011

 

This Friday, the IOM will take a first stab at answering one of health reform’s most important unknowns: What counts as an “essential health benefit”?

 

Health Insurers Lead Lobbying Spending

Insurance News Net, October 3, 2011

 

Health insurers continue to lead lobbying spending in Washington, while the property/casualty side and life insurers are investing in influencing Dodd-Frank implementation.

 

Surgeons Tout Twitter Use at Hospitals to Enhance Training

Fierce Healthcare, October 3, 2011

 

Although some hospitals are limiting social media use among their physicians in fear of possible legal repercussions, Univ of Buffalo is encouraging its surgeons to tweet.

 

HHS Wants to Give Patients Test Results Straight From Lab

Amednews, October 3, 2011

 

Proposed changes to federal regulations would override existing laws in 20 states and give patients access to laboratory test results without having first to talk with the physicians who ordered the tests.

 

Five Ways To Squeeze Medicare

USA Today, October 3, 2011

 

Nearly 50 million people on Medicare, as well as those entering the program at a pace of one every eight seconds, are likely to get more than their money’s worth before they die.

 

After Years of Big Increases, Practice Costs Drop 2.2%

Amednews, October 3, 2011

 

The cost of operating a medical practice declined an average of 2.2% in 2010, according to an annual report.

 

How Medicare Wastes Almost $50 Billion a Year

The Fiscal Times, September 27, 2011

 

Improper payments – to the wrong person, in the wrong amount, or for the wrong reason — cost Medicare $48 billion last year.

 

Patients Face Mounting Medical Bills In Down Economy

The California Report, September 12, 2011

 

Last year about one in four adults under 65 reported having medical debt, an all-time high for the country. That's because health care costs continue to rise at the same time people are losing their jobs and health coverage.

 

Deficit Panel Eyes Good Ol' Options

Politico, September 11, 2011

 

It has only met once, but the new deficit-cutting supercommittee doesn’t seem to be pushing the envelope with fresh ideas.

 

Health Insurers Deny Coverage to Many Who Apply for Individual Policies

Kaiser Health News, September 11, 2011

 

Amanda Hite says she felt "really healthy" when she applied recently for health insurance. But Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield denied her.

 

Financial Incentives for Doctors Don't Always Help

Reuters, September 9, 2011

 

Health systems haven't figured out how best to structure financial incentives to encourage primary care doctors to do their jobs better, suggests a new paper.

 

Doctor Fees Major Factor in Health Costs, Study Says

The New York Times, September 7, 2011

 

WASHINGTON — Doctors are paid higher fees in the United States than in several other countries, and this is a major factor in the nation’s higher overall cost of health care, says a new study.

 

UnitedHealth Buys Another Calif. Doctor Group

NPR, September 1, 2011

 

If you live in Southern California, the chances that your doctor's paycheck will be cut by a UnitedHealth Group company are on the rise.

The Wall Street Journal, September 1, 2011

 

Social Media Pressure for Practices Intensifies

Fierce Practice Management, August 31, 2011

 

Still not on the social media bandwagon? Think the Facebook fad will pass? If so, consider these stats recently released from Pew Research Center & reported in WSJ.

 

Social Media Pressure for Practices Intensifies

The Hill, August 29, 2011

 

A new medical research body created by the healthcare reform law should not consider the cost of treatments when evaluating them, the nation's largest physician lobby argues.

 

Mayo, Cleveland Clinic Launch Practice Affiliations

Fierce Healthcare, August 29, 2011

 

Careful not to call them mergers or acquisitions, Mayo Clinic and Cleveland Clinic separately are launching campaigns to affiliate with physician practices.

 

Proposed Rule Requires Insurers to Explain Costs and Benefits

Amednews, August 29, 2011

 

Health plans will be required to provide consumers with a standardized, six-page form explaining the plans' costs and benefits as early as March 2012.

 

Nearly All Physicians Must Revalidate Medicare Enrollment by 2013

Amednews, August 29, 2011

 

Doctors are concerned that enrollment problems could lead some in good standing to get kicked out of the program.

 

Medical Clinics in Retail Settings Are Booming

USA Today, August 28, 2011

 

One morning last month, when 12yr-old Ashley woke with a nasty earache, her mom decided against waiting for an appointment & driving 7 miles to their busy pediatrician's office.

 

U.S. Must Cut Spending On Medical Technology, Harvard Study Says

Bloomberg, August 26, 2011

 

U.S. policy makers wrestling with the deficit should focus on reducing the number of angioplasties & other medical procedures that don't always deliver clinical benefits.

 

Hospitals' Role in Recruiting Physicians Into Private Practice: 4 Touch Points

Becker’s Hospital  Review, August 22, 2011

 

Recruiting physicians into existing private practices is recognized as the ideal medical staff development scenario, the private practice expands its service & revenue base while adding only incremental expense.

 

Aetna Touts Mobile Alerts For Instant Patient Access

Fierce health Payer, August 19, 2011

 

Hoping to increase communication between doctors and patients and better coordinate healthcare, Aetna is providing physicians with new mobile tools.

 

Hospitals Gobble Up More Doctors

Kaiser Health News, August 18, 2011

 

The race among hospitals to hire local physicians is heating up, even though the consequences for the cost & quality of health care are still unclear.

 

Health Overhaul to Make Insurers Label Plans Like Cereal Boxes

Bloomberg, August 17, 2011

 

Health insurers will have to provide descriptive labels similar to those found on food products.

 

AMGA: Most medical Groups Operating at a Loss

Fierce Practice Management, August 17, 2011

 

With very slight increases in compensation across specialties, most medical groups operated at a significant financial loss in 2010, reveals the AMGA.

 

Medicare Muddles Search For a Physician

The Columbian, August 17, 2011

 

When Helen & Rick Gill moved from Pensacola, Fla., to Clark County 4 yrs ago, one of the tasks on their to-do list was to find a new primary care doctor. That turned out to be more difficult than anticipated.

 

$4.7B in Cuts Threaten Medicaid Expansion

Fierce Health Finance, August 16, 2011

 

Although Medicaid coverage is expected to be dramatically expanded in 2014 as a result of the PPACA, program, cuts enacted on the state level could hamper coverage options.

 

Physicians Have The Expertise To Get Delivery Systems Right

Amednews, August 15, 2011

 

A message to all physicians from Robert M. Wah, MD, chair of the AMA Board of Trustees.

 

Health Plan Profits Coming Before Growth in Membership

Amednews, August 15, 2011

 

The largest shareholder-owned insurers are expanding along with earnings, but plans aren't swinging their doors open for just anyone.

 

Health Care And The Constitution

The Washington Post, August 12, 2011

 

THE CONSTITUTIONALITY of the new health-care law, specifically, the constitutionality of the requirement that every individual obtain health insurance or pay a fine, is now squarely teed up for the Supreme Court.

 

Sebelius Highlights National Health Plans

The Hill, August 11, 2011

 

HHS Secretary Sebelius highlighted the national healthcare plans that will be available through state-based insurance exchanges.

 

FAQ: Debt Deal 'Super' Committee's Impact On Health Spending Explained

Kaiser Health News, August 11, 2011

 

The deal President Obama & Congress struck this week to raise the nation's debt ceiling has prompted many questions about how a special "super committee" established by law will affect federal health care programs.

 

Why Has The Healthcare Industry Been Slow to Automate its Processes?

Medcity, August 10, 2011

 

I’m often asked why healthcare has been slow to automate its processes compared to other industries such as the airlines, shipping /logistics, or the financial services industry...

 

4 Tips For a Strong Post-Recession Practice

Fierce Practice Management, August 10, 2011

 

Even with signs of economic recovery, patients are struggling to pay their medical bills, making it continually difficult for practices to maintain healthy bottom lines.

 

ER Use Of CT Scans Rises Sharply, Raising Questions About Costs And Benefits

Kaiser Health News, August 10, 2011

 

Emergency department patients are getting CT scans at rates 5 times higher than in the mid-1990s, a new study finds.

 

Demonstration Project Seen As Model For ACOs

The Hill, August 8, 2011

 

The Medicare agency heralded a test program Monday that it says will serve as a model for healthcare reform's ACOs.

 

Medicare Extends Experiment in Paying Doctors

New York Times, August 8, 2011

 

After 5 years of testing the idea, Medicare officials said they believe that doctors who coordinate care & keep their patients out of the hospital can help reduce the nation’s health care costs.

 

Rated Negatively Online? What’s a Physician To Do?

Amednews, August 8, 2011

 

Scenario: How should professionals respond to physician-rating websites? An increasing number of websites invite patients to rate physicians and clinics as they would restaurants.

 

New Payment Models Promote Undertreatment, Malpractice Risks

Fierce Healthcare, August 5, 2011

 

New coordinated care models, like ACOs, are being touted as ways to eliminate unnecessary tests & procedures & improve care.

 

Blue Shield CEO: Reduce Costs With ACOs

Kaiser Health News, August 4, 2011

 

One key to reducing medical costs is collaboration among insurers, their members, providers & their patients within ACOs because everyone is focused on providing the best healthcare at the lowest costs.

 

Debt Deal Raises Pressure On Medicare Providers

Los Angeles Times, August 3, 2011

 

Washington policymakers demanded more savings from hospitals, doctors & other medical providers in the deal President Obama signed, a move designed to protect seniors & others who rely on Medicare.

 

3 Tips For Right-Sizing Practice Staff

Fierce Practice Management, August 3, 2011

 

If there's ever been a time to right size your office staff, it's now, practice management expert Elizabeth Woodcock recently wrote in ModernMedicine.

 

New Jersey Doctors' Group Loses Bid to Reinstate Health Care Law Challenge

Bloomberg, August 3, 2011

 

A U.S. appeals court rejected a bid by group of NJ doctors to reinstate their lawsuit challenging federal health-insurance overhaul.

 

How To Negotiate The Restrictive Covenant In Your Employment Contract

Physician News, August 1, 2011

 

With economic pressures on physicians mounting & regulatory incentives to affiliate with larger entities expanding, an increasing number of physicians are becoming employees of larger medical groups/health care systems.

 

Poor Report Cards Tell Insurers To Do Their Homework

Amednews, August 1, 2011

 

When schools send kids home with their report cards, it's not only so parents can keep tabs on their children's education. It's also so the students who are not making the grade can see the areas where they need to improve.

 

Direct Primary Care Model: Cutting Out The Insurer

Amednews, August 1, 2011

 

A small but enthusiastic minority of primary care physicians believe they have found a practice model that can save money, improve patients' long-term health and drastically reduce administrative hassles: direct primary care.

 

Insurance Coverage for Contraception Is Required

New York Times, August 1, 2011

 

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration issued new standards on Monday that require health insurance plans to cover all government-approved contraceptives for women, without co-payments or other charges.

 

Clinical Informatics Poised To Become Medical Subspecialty

Information Week, July 29, 2011

 

Clinical informatics could soon become a recognized, board-certified subspecialty of medicine.

 

New Primary Care Options Popping Up Across The Country (Video)

Kaiser Health News, July 29, 2011

 

KHN’s "Insuring Your Health" columnist Michelle Andrews talks with Jackie Judd about convenient ways consumers are getting health care: House calls, workplace clinics and free-standing emergency rooms. Most of the time, insurers will cover the visit.

 

Physician Alignment Presents Biggest Obstacle to ACOs

Amednews, July 25, 2011

 

The biggest challenge to forming an accountable care organization is physician alignment, according to one survey.

 

Head Of Major HMO Sees Openings For ACOs

Kaiser Health News, July 25, 2011

 

Long before the sweeping health law was even a notion on Capitol Hill, HMOs were a force in American medicine.

 

Revised Medicare Forms Ask Doctors if They Accept New Patients

Amednews, July 25, 2011

 

The Medicare program is taking a more direct approach to determining whether physicians are willing to take on new Medicare patients.

 

Foreign-Trained Health Professionals Put on Path to Practice in U.S.

Amednews, July 25, 2011

 

Dr. Maria Angelica Montenegro practiced more than 5 years as a family physician in Colombia before moving to the US in 2004.

 

Drug Prices to Plummet in Wave of Expiring Patents

San Francisco Chronicle, July 25, 2011

 

The cost of prescription medicines used by millions of people every day is about to plummet.

 

Analysis: Enrollment Lags in New Health Care Plan

Bloomberg, July 25 2011

 

One of the first prongs of President Obama's health care law has been in effect for a year, the result in Missouri is that about 500 additional people with chronic health problems now have insurance.

 

Lawsuit Says Drugs Were Wasted To Buoy Profit

New York Times, July 25, 2011

 

One of the nation's largest providers of kidney dialysis deliberately wasted medicine in order to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in extra payments from Medicare, a former clinic nurse & doctor are charging in a whistle-blower lawsuit.

 

Why Washington Lets Medicare and Medicaid Fraudsters Bilk Taxpayers of Trillions

Forbes, July 21, 2011

 

Earlier this month, Mike Cannon published an important, must-read article on the problem of Medicare & Medicaid fraud. As he notes, “judging by official estimates, Medicare & Medicaid lose at least $87 billion/year to fraudulent & otherwise improper payments.

 

‘Medical Home’ Health Care Model, Focusing on Prevention, Shows Results and Cuts Costs

The Washington Post, July 20, 2011

 

A budding model for primary care that encourages the family doctor to act as a health coach who focuses as much on preventing illness as on treating it has shown promising results and saved insurers millions of dollars.

 

Sound Medical Advice

New York Times, July 20, 2011

 

In an encouraging development for women’s health, an advisory panel of leading experts has recommended all insurers be required to offer contraceptives as well as other preventive services free of charge under the new health care law.

 

New Research from SSI and TRiG Reveals Doctors Don't Spend Enough Time with Patients, are Not Punctual and Don't Answer Questions

Fierce Practice Management, July 20, 2011

 

New studies by SSI & TRiG show two-thirds of patients around the world feel disrespected by their physicians.

 

Rising Costs Complicate Vaccine Guidelines

NPR, July 20, 2011

 

The group that advises the U.S. government on vaccination thinks some new vaccines may not be worth the cost.

 

Dropped Medical Malpractice Claims: Their Surprising Frequency, Apparent Causes, And Potential Remedies

Health Affairs, July 19, 2011

 

Most medical malpractice claims are neither settled nor adjudicated. They are abandoned by the plaintiffs who bring them.

 

Implementing Health Reform: Insurance Cooperatives

Health Affairs, July 19, 2011

 

The exchange and the reinsurance, risk adjustment, and risk corridor (3R) proposed regulations released by HHS July 11 were only the first two in a series of exchange-related notices of proposed rulemakings (NPRMs) that will be rolled out in the coming weeks and months.

 

Medicare Proposes a 50% Cut For Some Imaging Fees in 2012

Amednews, July 18, 2011

 

As physicians try to stop an across-the-board Medicare pay cut of 29.5% from taking effect January, the CMS is proposing additional pay reductions for certain specialists & penalties for those who fail to prescribe electronically next year.

 

Healthcare IT Faces Deadline on New Medical Codes

PC World, July 18, 2011

 

A new federally mandated medical coding system designed to better track diagnoses and treatments is requiring a massive overhaul of healthcare IT systems that some say will be nearly impossible to complete on time.

 

Patients Worse Off With More-Experienced Docs?

Reuters, July 15, 2011

 

In a study that flies in the face of common sense, sicker patients turned out to fare worse under the care of seasoned doctors than when newcomers to medicine looked after them.

 

Doctor's Office Is Source of Many Infections

Med Page Today, July 15, 2011

 

Physician offices need to up their game to meet basic infection control standards, according to the CDC.

 

Avoiding Patients on Facebook Healthier for Doctors, Medical Group Says

Bloomberg, July 13, 2011

 

Social-networking services such as Facebook  pose risks for doctors, who should “politely refuse” requests from patients & be wary of posting on Twitter, the BMA said.

 

CDC Releases New Outpatient Safety Checklist

Kaiser Health News, July 13, 2011

 

Just as airline pilots are required to use safety checklists before taking off, so should medical facilities who are treating people on an outpatient basis, said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

Some Doctors Insist on Brand-Name Drugs Even When Cheaper Generics Are Available

The Washington Post, July 11, 2011

 

Three words to watch out for next time you get a new prescription: “Dispense as Written.” Scrawled across the prescription form in your doctor’s hand, or, more likely, ticked off on a check box.

 

Bad Information: Inexpensive Docs May Not Save Money

Health Resources Publishing, July 11, 2011

 

Insurance plans encouraging patients to receive care from physicians who keep medical costs lower are based on unreliable information, according to a new RAND. Study.

 

After Much Scrutiny, HHS Releases Health Insurance Exchange Rules

Kaiser Health News, July 11, 2011

 

Federal regulators released proposed rules that will govern how states set up and run new marketplaces where individuals and small businesses can shop for health insurance.

 

Doctors Inc.:  New for Aspiring Doctors, the People Skills Test

New York Times, July 10, 2011

 

A new admission process at medical schools involves a series of encounters meant to examine aspiring doctors' ability to communicate and work in teams.

 

Premiums Drop 40% for High-Risk Plans

Fierce Health Payer, July 8, 2011

 

Hoping to encourage enrollment in high-risk insurance programs, the HHS decreased premiums for the pre-existing condition insurance plans by as much as 40% in some states.

 

Coding for the Rest of Us: Why Everyone in Your Practice Needs a Basic Knowledge of Coding

Healthcare It News, July 7, 2011

 

There is no one, and I do mean no one, in your medical practice who does not need to know the basics of coding. Here is why: Providing services to patients is the business of healthcare.

 

Doctors In Small Practices Slow To Dump Paper Records

Kaiser Health News, July 7, 2011

 

In Dr. Sandra Berglund’s well-stocked waiting room, there’s a box of children’s toys & picture books &, on either side of a magazine rack, framed photos of sacred places: the stadiums of the Cleveland Browns & Cleveland Indians.

 

When Health Insurance Isn't Enough

Salon, July 6, 2011

 

With 60% of all bankruptcies related to medical costs; with many of those medical-related bankruptcies occurring among those who have private insurance; and with the fear of medical bankruptcy encouraging the insured to unduly skimp on medical services.

 

Medical Practice Managers Reveal Top Struggles

Fierce Practice Management, July 6, 2011

 

For the fourth year, medical practice professionals sounded off to the Medical Group Management Association about their biggest daily professional challenges.

 

Insurers Mishandle 1 in 5 Claims, AMA Finds

Amednews, July 4, 2011

 

Barbara McAneny, MD, says insurers' inability to consistently pay claims correctly is costing her practice a lot of money -- hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

 

Medicare Proposal Links Surgical Center Payments To Quality

The Hill, July 1, 2011

 

The CMS on Friday unveiled its proposed payment rates for physicians, outpatient hospitals and dialysis facilities in 2012.

 

CMS Proposes Policy, Payment Rate Changes for Physician Fee Schedule in 2012

Fierce Practice Management, July 1, 2011

 

CMS issued a proposed rule that would update payment policies & rates for physicians & non physician practitioners (NPPs) for services paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

 

Managed Care Enters the Exam Room as Insurers Buy Doctors Groups

The Washington Post, July 1, 2011

 

United health services wing is quietly gaining control of doctors who treat patients covered by United plans — buying medical groups and launching physician management companies.

 

Health Care Costs Vary Widely, Study Shows

USA Today, July 1, 2011

 

Patients pay as much as 683% more for the same medical procedures, such as MRIs or CT scans, in the same town, depending on which doctor they choose, according to a new study by a national health care group.

 

Giving Medical Receptionists Their Due

New York Times, June 30, 2011

 

Not long ago, the receptionist on the hospital floor where I work went on a family leave. Calm & with a wisecracking wit she attributes to her NJ roots, she worked at the hospital for years and knew better than anyone how to make things happen in the system.

 

Blue Shield ACO Keeps Premiums Low, Could Be Model For Others

Fierce Health Payer, June 30, 2011

 

BSCA and the hospitals and physicians it partners with say their arrangement, which has successfully kept premiums flat, could be an example for federal officials and other healthcare businesses looking to create ACOs.

 

A Hospital’s Newest Weapon Against Infection: Duct Tape

Kaiser Health News, June 30, 2011

 

In one year, infection specialists saved a Midwest hospital system $110,000 and 2,700 staff hours, by using duct tape.

 

Affordable Care Act to Improve Data Collection, Reduce Health Disparities

HSS, June 29, 2011

 

HHS announces new draft standards to improve the monitoring of health data by race, ethnicity, sex, primary language, and disability status.

 

Administration Halts Survey of Making Doctor Visits

New York Times, June 28, 2011

 

The Obama administration said Tuesday that it had shelved plans for a survey in which “mystery shoppers” posing as patients would call doctors’ offices to see how difficult it was to get appointments.

 

RWJF Launches Web Site to Help Patients Compare Local Hospitals and Physicians

RWJF, June 28, 2011

 

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation launched the nation’s most comprehensive online directory for patients to find reliable information on the quality of health care provided by physicians and hospitals in their communities.

 

Doctors More Likely To Drop Private Insurance Than Medicare

NPR, June 27, 2011

 

There's a lot of chatter about how public policy can influence doctors' decisions about which new patients to see & which to turn away.

 

4 Items Added to Serious Reportable Events List

Amednews, June 27, 2011

 

The NQF in June proposed an updated version of its list of serious reportable events, such as medication errors that kill or gravely injure patients.

 

MedPAC Seeks to Rein in Imaging Pay

Amednews, June 27, 2011

 

Certain physicians who interpret the results of diagnostic imaging procedures should undergo fee reductions, & physicians who order far more imaging than their colleagues should be subject to prior authorization requirements, according to MedPAC recommendations in its June report to Congress.

 

Concierge Medicine Has A Cost For All Patients

L.A. Times,  June 27, 2011

 

Concierge medicine — you may have heard of it — is gaining in popularity. Patients pay a monthly fee directly to the doctor, on top of their regular health insurance premiums and co-pays, to secure better access to the physician.

 

Health Care’s Move From Paper to Pixels Slow

Politico, June 23, 2011

 

Electronic health records are at the center of some of the key reforms of the ACA, because having reliable data to track patients, trends & possible fraud is one of the ways reformers think they will eventually be able to bend the cost curve.

 

Leasing a Smart Alternative to Purchasing Equipment

Fierce Practice Management, June 22, 2011

 

For practices that want to furnish their offices with state-of-the-art equipment without the risks of purchasing it outright, leasing presents a smart alternative, according to a recent Medical Economics article

 

MDs Building Concierge, Cash Businesses With Patient-Friendly Promises

Fierce Practice Management, June 22, 2011

 

From longevity to 24/7 physician access, the promises from a growing crop of concierge and direct-pay practices are not just grabbing headlines, but also the attention of an impressive clientele of patients willing to pay retainer fees out of pocket.

 

Taking On Healthcare Costs via the Private Sector

Seeking Alpha, June 20, 2011

 

MOVING THE MARKET: Recent unrest in the Middle East and higher oil prices have overtaken much of the financial media attention since the beginning of 2011 and masked what could become the Achilles' Heel of the U.S. Economy.

 

Out-of-Network Rates

Wall  Street Journal, June 19, 2011

 

Consumers know they will have to pay out of their pockets if they use medical providers outside their insurers' networks. Because of a little-noticed change, they may find themselves with even bigger bills than expected. Several major insurers are now using rates based on Medicare fees to calculate payments for out-of-network providers.

 

Health Care Reform Creates New Wave Of IT Workers

Minnesota Public Radio, June 17, 2011

 

As part of the federal government's push to get hospitals & clinics to adopt electronic medical records, it's subsidizing IT training classes across the country.

 

Why Cost Containment in Health Care Is Impossible

Minyanville, June 16, 2011

 

The government can't get cost control without goring the oxes of patients, physicians, pharmaceutical companies, insurers, device manufacturers and hospitals.

 

HSA Enrollment Reaches 11.4 Million More than 11.4 million

InsuranceNewsNet, June 16, 2011

 

Americans are covered by Health Savings Account (HSA)-eligible insurance plans, a more than 14 percent increase since last year, according to a new census released by America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP).

 

Study Finds Equal Number of Errors in Hospitals, Doctors' Offices

U.S.News, June 14, 2011

 

Your chances of suffering harm because of a medical error are about the same in a doctor's office as in a hospital, according to a new study.

 

Better-Informed Patients Can Help Cut Costs

USA Today, June 14, 2011

 

A combination of giving patients more information about their conditions & better managing their medications can slow the revolving door of Medicare patients in and out of hospitals by about 20%, a study shoms, released  by Harvard University.

 

It’s the Health Care Costs, Stupid

The New York Times, June 12, 2011

 

I've already written about Joe Lieberman’s very bad, no good idea of raising the Medicare eligibility age.

 

Obama Plan To Cut Pediatric Training Draws Protests

Kaiser Health News, June 13, 2011

 

The Obama administration’s bid to slash funding for training pediatricians at children’s hospitals is provoking intense protests from medical educators and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.

 

Hospital Urged to Consider Medical Mall at Pascack

The Record, June 13, 2011

 

While Hackensack UMC forges ahead with an application to reopen Pascack Valley Hospital, its opponents say a medical mall with OP care would better serve a region they believe already has too many hospital beds

 

To Curb Malpractice Costs, Judges Jump In Early

The New York Times, June 12, 2011

 

In Justice Douglas E. McKeon’s fluorescent-lighted chambers in the Bronx, a new way of handling medical malpractice suits was on full, and sometimes gruesome, display.

 

More on the McKinsey Report: How Employers Can Take Extra Advantage of Obamacare’s Subsidies

Forbes, June 10, 2011

 

Earlier this week, I wrote about the new McKinsey study, which found 30% of employers are likely to drop employer-sponsored health insurance after 2014, affecting as many as 78 million Americans.

 

WellPoint Buying CareMore to Better Compete in Senior Market

FierceHealthPayer,  June 10, 2011

 

In an attempt to better compete within the senior healthcare market, WellPoint is purchasing Medicare specialist CareMore Health Group for $800 million.

 

Doc Groups Stuff ACO Suggestion Box With Complaints

Fierce Practice Management, June 8, 2011

 

The public comment period for the CMS proposed rule regarding ACOs closed June 6, and major organizations that represent physicians made sure to contribute their thoughts.

 

HHS Makes $40 Million Available For States' Chronic Disease Prevention

The Hill, June 7, 2011

 

States and territories are eligible for up to $40 million to strengthen and coordinate efforts to prevent chronic disease, the Health and Human Services Department announced Tuesday.

 

House Passes Insurance Exchange Bill

The Lund Report, June 7 2011

 

A bill that sets in motion the creation of a health insurance exchange in Oregon passed the House of Representatives today with 48 votes in favor & 12 opposed.

 

The Hard Truth About Health Care

The Washington Post, June 6, 2011

 

Everyone in Washington claims to want the same thing lately: a “serious conversation” about health-care costs. So let’s have one.

 

Health Reform Essential To Young Adults: Nearly Half Can't Afford Needed Health Care

Insurance News Net, June 2, 2011

 

Young adults ages 19-29 are struggling to get the health care they need more than almost any other age group, demonstrating the need for ACA provisions.

 

5 Thoughts on ACOs From Healthcare Leaders

Becker’s Hospital Review, June 1, 2011

 

Three healthcare experts weighed in on accountable care organizations during a recent panel session at the Becker's Hospital Review Annual Meeting.

 

Empire Debuts P4P For New York Physicians

Managed Care Information Center, June 1, 2011

 

Empire BCBS, the largest insurer in NY, is unveiling a P4P program to reward doctors who comply with certain best practices. It won’t penalize those who fall short. Empire plans to use claims data to better monitor whether physicians are complying with widely accepted medical best practices.

 

Big Flaws In How Medicare Pays Hospitals, Doctors

Kaiser Health News, June 1, 2011

 

Medicare pays more to doctors and hospitals in expensive parts of the country. A prestigious panel says Medicare’s methods of evaluating regional costs are disturbingly imprecise & need to be overhauled.

 

Post-HMO Health Care: Are ACOs the Answer?

Time, May 31, 2011

 

"Remember the 1990s" retrospective lists always include Nirvana, Monica Lewinsky and Wayne's World, but leave out another major product that defined American life in the '90s: the health maintenance organization, or HMO

 

Physician Compensation 8% Of Healthcare Costs

Medical News Today, May 27, 2011

 

Physician compensation accounts for roughly 8% of the total annual healthcare costs in the U.S., according to Jackson Healthcare, an Atlanta-based healthcare staffing and technology company.

 

U.S. Pays $158 Million to Doctors to Adopt Digital Records

Bloomberg, May 26, 2011

 

The U.S. government paid more than $158.3 million to hospitals & doctors this year to encourage adoption of electronic health records.

 

Three Ways to Improve Patients' Experiences via Waiting Room Design

Fierce Practice Management, Mat 25, 2011

 

Of course, the ideal medical office waiting room is one in which patients spend very little time. given the reality that patients' experience in your reception area goes a long way toward their impressions about your practice, consider the following ideas to make it more patient-friendly.

 

New Trade Group Aims to Ensure Sanctity of Patient Health Records

Managed Care Information Center, May 24, 2011

 

The Clinical Documentation Industry Association (CDIA) announced the launch of a new industry trade association dedicated to ensuring the accuracy, consistency and security of clinical documentation contained within all patient health records.

 

Plans Underway to Design Performance-Based Contracting Program for Physician Groups

Managed Care Information Center, May 24, 2011

 

The Integrated Healthcare Association (IHA) has been awarded an 18-month, $281,000 grant to support the development of a performance based contracting program aimed to help health plans in California.

 

Many On-The-Job Clinics Offer Primary Care

Kaiser Health News, May 24, 2011

 

"That's where the money is," Willie Sutton famously quipped when asked why he robbed banks. There's a similar rationale for employers who hope to improve employee health and contain costs with workplace health clinics: That's where the people are.

 

New Trade Group Aims to Ensure Sanctity of Patient Health Records

Managed Care Information Center, May 24, 2011

 

The Clinical Documentation Industry Association (CDIA) announced the launch of a new industry trade association dedicated to ensuring the accuracy, consistency and security of clinical documentation contained within all patient health records.

 

Poll of Emergency Physicians Shows More Than Half Order Tests as Protection Against Being Sued   

American College of Emergency Physicians, May 23, 2011

 

Nearly half (44%) of almost 1,800 emergency physicians responding to a poll report that the biggest challenge to cutting costs in the emergency department is the fear of lawsuits.

 

More Solid Proof That Obamacare is Working

Forbes, May 23, 2011

 

Recent data provided by the nation’s largest health insurance companies reveals that a provision of the ACA – or Obamacare – is bringing big numbers of the uninsured into the health care insurance system. And they are precisely the uninsured that we want– the young people who tend not to get sick.

 

New York Bill Seeks Physician Dress Code to Cut Infections

Amednews, May 23, 2011

 

NY physicians may have to take off their neckties, jewelry, wristwatches & long-sleeved white coats when caring for patients if a bill under consideration in the state Legislature becomes law.

 

Co-Pay or No Co-Pay? That is The Confusing Question

Amednews, May 23, 2011

 

Preventive care, a long list of services including mammograms, childhood vaccines & tobacco cessation counseling, for patients covered by private insurance is, in most cases, supposed to be covered without co-pays or coinsurance, thanks to the PPACA.

 

Ford Developing Health-Monitoring Technology for Cars

LA Times, May 19, 2011

 

Smart phones have already supplemented the doctor’s office & personal computers as sources of health advice, now it appears car companies are driving into the on-the-go consumer health market.

 

Horizon Blue Cross Scraps For-Profit Conversion Plan

NJ.com, May 18, 2011

 

Horizon BCBSNJ officially called off its plan to become a for-profit company. A Horizon spokesman said the insurer had a new priority: preparing for a far-reaching overhaul to federal health-care laws to take effect in 2014.

 

One Way for Hospitals to Cut Costs of Tests

Wall Street Journal, May 17, 2011

 

Making physicians aware of the costs of blood tests can lower a hospital's daily bill for those tests by as much 27%, a new study suggests.

 

When It Comes to EHR Adoption, Practice Size Matters

IhealthBeat, May 17, 2011

 

It's no secret that small physician practices are less likely than larger practices and hospitals to adopt and use electronic health record systems. The federal government's meaningful use incentive program aims to drive widespread EHR adoption. But, small practices are lagging behind.

 

Study Shows ACO Start-Up Costs Can Soar Up to $26.1M  

Becker’s Hospital Review, May16, 2011

 

The current estimated start-up and first-year costs to establish & sustain core competencies for ACOs are higher than the original estimate of $1.8 million by the CMS in its proposed rule, according to an AHA News Now report.

 

Life After Lawsuit: How Doctors Pick Up The Pieces

Amednews, May 16, 2011

 

Before dawn, nearly every morning in the days leading to his trial, Stephen Lutz, MD, woke abruptly, his mind filled with thoughts of the looming witness stand.

 

The Old Practice of House Calls is Returning to Some Areas

Kaiser Health News, May 10, 2011

 

Nobody likes taking time out of a busy day to cool their heels in a doctor's waiting room. Now you may not have to. Some primary-care practitioners are bringing their black bags directly to home or office, in some cases for as little as $30-$35 a visit.

 

5 Questions: Dean Pizzo on Doctor-Patient Communication

Stanford School of Medicine, May 9, 2011

 

For all the technological advances that enable today’s physicians to get a better view of what’s going on inside their patients, many neglect one key source of insight, direct & engaged conversation.

 

Doctors Loath to Pay for Unbiased Education: Survey

Reuters, May 9, 2011

 

While doctors believe industry funding may bias their continuing medical education, they are unwilling to pay for impartial information, a new survey finds.

 

Comsumer Rebates at Stake As States Seek to Soften Rule on Insurers’ Profits    

Kaiser Health News, May 9, 2011

In a move that could absolve health insurers of paying more than $95 million in consumer rebates, nine states are pressing for relief from a federal rule limiting insurers’ profits and administrative costs.

 

Physicians With Many Medicaid Patients are Likely to Treat More in 2014

Amednews, May 9, 2011

 

Increasing patient capacity for PCPs already seeing a large number of Medicaid patients might be the best way to prepare for the millions of people who will become eligible for the program in 2014 under the health system reform law.

 

States Eye Public Access to More Doctor Disciplinary Records

Amednews, May 9, 2011

 

A long-running push for increased transparency in the medical profession has led medical boards nationwide to release more information about physicians' professional and disciplinary history online during the last 15 years.

 

Beware Physician Compare: Medicare Site Inaccurate, Say Wronged Practices

Amednews, May 9, 2011

 

Doctors & other health professionals are disheartened with what they've found out about themselves on Medicare's Physician Compare web site.

 

The IPAB: How Will It Change Medicare?    

Kaiser Health News, May 8, 2011

 

It sounds like a new Apple product, but IPAB is actually a controversial board at the heart of a highly charged battle over Medicare, the federal health program for the elderly and disabled.

 

Is Your Physical Office an Obstacle Course of Liability?

Beckers Hospital Review,  May 6, 2011

 

When it comes to compliance and liability, the safety of your physical office space is probably the last thing that comes to mind.

 

ACOs: 5 Tips to Avoid Anticompetitive Behavior

Beckers Hospital Review, May 4, 2011

 

At the end of March, the FTC and the DOJ released a proposed antitrust policy statement for ACOs. While the guidance is directed toward ACOs that participate in the Medicare Shared Savings Program, it also addresses antitrust issues for these ACOs' dealings with commercial insurers.

 

Reverse Mentoring: The Secret to Retaining Seasoned Docs?

Fierce Practice Management, May 4, 2011

 

Today's physicians will ultimately have to embrace new technologies in order to keep making their livings as doctors.

 

Health Insurers Opening Their Own Clinics To Trim Costs

Kaiser Health News, May 4, 2011

 

Every few months, James S. Miller, a 68-year-old retired transit worker and jazz saxophonist, would arrive by electric wheelchair at North Philadelphia hospital emergency rooms.

 

At Least 600,000 Young Adults Join Parents’ Health Plans Under New Law

Kaiser Health News, May 3, 2011

 

Hundreds of thousands of young adults are taking advantage of the health care law provision that allows people under 26 to remain on their parents' health plans, some of the nation's largest insurers are reporting.

 

Is a “Mystery Shopper” Coming to Your Waiting Room?

Physician’s Money Digest, May 2, 2011

 

Retailers, hotel chains & financial-services firms have long employed “mystery shoppers” to gauge how well, or poorly, their customers are treated.

 

Family Physicians Tied to Lower Readmissions   

The Boston Globe, May 2, 2011

 

A one-page report published yesterday by the American Family Physician journal says one way to reduce readmission rates is to increase the number of doctors who choose family medicine

 

Is My County Healthier Than Yours?

Time, May 2, 2011

 

Recently the University of Wisconsin and the RWJF released its second annual County Health Rankings, a within-state comparison of county health covering each county in every state the United States.

 

Medicare Quality Bonuses Elude Nearly Half of Reporting Doctors  

AmedNews, May 2, 2011

 

The Medicare program paid a record $234 million in quality reporting bonuses to doctors in 2009, but participation in the Physician Quality Reporting System continued to falter as a large segment of eligible professionals either failed to meet minimum requirements or did not bother with the initiative.

 

Businesses Turn to 'Private Exchange' Health Insurance

USA Today, April 30,  2011

 

Fed up with the unpredictable cost of health insurance for his small business, Mike Sarafolean last year made a dramatic change: Instead of picking a plan to offer workers, he now sends them to a "private exchange" or marketplace where they compare & choose their own insurance.

 

WellPoint Raises Forecast After First-Quarter Earnings Beat Estimates

Bloomberg, April 27, 2011

 

Aetna and Wellpoint continued the trend of health insurers reporting better-than-expected earnings and raising their 2011 profit forecasts.

 

From Competitive to Collaborative: 5 Transaction Trends in ACO Development

Beckers Hospital Review, April 26, 2011

 

A merger may cause organizations to lose their marketplace standing. An important question to ask during a merger is this: If Hospital A is merging with Hospital B, what is Hospital C doing during this time?

 

Recruiting Physicians Takes Twice as Long as a Decade Ago

Becker’s Hospital Review, April 21, 2011

 

It takes twice as long to recruit a physician today than it did just a decade ago, due to a growing shortage that is expected to worsen as demand for physicians grows & supply remains flat.

 

Perspectives: These Days, Everyone Has an Opinion on Medical Loss Ratios

Insurance News Net, April 19, 2011

 

Recently, HealthLeaders-InterStudy, a managed care research firm, released a study that found some health insurers in four Midwest states will have trouble meeting the minimum medical loss ratio requirements laid out by the PPACA.

 

Not e-claim compliant? Expect no pay in 2012

Amednews, April 25, 2011

 

On Jan. 1, 2012, if physicians' practice management systems are not up to new standards, they will risk not getting electronic payments from private insurers and Medicare.

 

Large Insurers Look to Acquisitions as a Way to Diversify

Amednews, April 20, 2011

 

Flush with cash, America's largest publicly traded health plans are ready to accelerate their pace of mergers and acquisitions. However, they're not necessarily looking to buy other insurers.

 

Changing Medicare to Improve Care, Cut Costs

MarketWatch, April 21, 2011

 

If you feel like the more health-care providers you have, the less they talk to each other, you’re not alone. But that may soon change for some patients.

 

More Doctors Gravitate Toward Boutique Practice

The Boston Globe, April 17, 2011

 

Concierge medicine is expanding as more doctors and patients, tire of assembly-line primary care, opting for something more personal & pricey.

 

HIT Expert Offers EHR Shopping Tips   

Kansas Health Institute, April 15, 2011

 

Medical providers, especially those in rural and small offices, who are shopping for an electronic health record vendor should consider the issue of data portability before making a decision.

 

Hiring in Physician Offices is Booming

Amednews, April 14, 2011

 

In the first quarter of 2011, physician practices added jobs at a rate more than 3 times higher than in Q1 of the previous year.

 

New flexibility for States to Improve Medicaid and Implement Innovative Practices

HSS.gov, April 14, 2011

 

The U.S. DHHS announced four initiatives to give states more flexibility to adopt innovative new practices and provide better, more coordinated care for people with Medicaid and Medicare while helping reduce costs for states and families.

 

Should Specialists Join ACOs?

Beckers Hospital Review, April 12, 2011

 

As hospitals and large multispecialty group practices gear up for ACOs, procedure-oriented specialists are still trying to figure out their role in them.

 

Developing an ACO: How to Manage Risk

Beckers Hospital Review, April 7, 2011

 

CMS recently released the long-awaited rules for ACOs. Now hospital leaders face the daunting task of sifting through over 400 pages of regulations to understand how to develop ACOs.

 

UnitedHealth, Humana To See 0.4% Medicare Rate Rise In 2012

Bloomberg, April 4, 2011

 

Medicare payments to U.S. health insurers led by UnitedHealth and Humana will increase 0.4% in 2012, less than projected because of lower-than-expected spending on doctor visits, regulators said.

 

Big Medical Groups Begin Patient Data

NY Times, April 6, 2011

 

The ideal of computerizing patient records is captured in the words behind the government’s aspirational acronym, N.H.I.N., for Nationwide Health Information Network.

 

Debunking The Mythology: The Utah And Massachusetts Health Exchanges

Kaiser Health News, April 6, 2011

 

Much has been made of the health insurance exchanges in Utah and Massachusetts, for many observers they sit on opposite points of a continuum of what exchanges can & should provide for consumers and small businesses.

 

Medical Sticker Shock: An Infuriating Encounter With A Cost Calculator

Common Health, April 1, 2011

 

A story of a patient who tried to be a smart health care shopper. But the system wouldn’t let him. The patient, Matt S., works in the health care industry & is pretty savvy.

 

Bill Would Post Every Physician's Medicare Billing Data  on Internet

Amednews, April 4, 2011

 

A Senate bill aimed at curtailing Medicare fraud would publish physician billing data online, letting viewers determine how much individual doctors earn annually from the program. The release of the data has been prohibited by a court ruling for more than 30 years.

 

Cuts Leave Patients With Medicaid Cards, But No Specialist To See

NY Times, April 1, 2011

 

8 yr-old Draven Smith was expelled from school last year for disruptive behavior, he is being expelled again this year. His mother & pediatrician cannot find a mental health specialist to treat him because he is on Medicaid, & the program, which provides health coverage for the poor, pays doctors so little that many refuse to take its patients.

 

Illinois Paying Doctors Bonuses For Providing Quality Care

Health Resource Publishing, April 4, 2011

 

The Illinois Dept of Healthcare and Family Services (HFS) paid approx $5 million in incentives to physicians who treated patients enrolled in the state’s Health Connect program – a primary care case management program administered by HFS.

 

New ACO Rules Outline Gains And Risks For Doctors, Hospitals

Kaiser Health News, March 31, 2011

 

Doctors and hospitals that join together under a new model of care could pocket as much as 60 percent of the money they save Medicare but could also face hefty penalties if they fall short under rules proposed by the Obama administration.

 

High-Deductible Plans: When Spending Less On Health Care Isn't Always Good News

Kaiser Health News, March 30, 2011

 

Conservatives think traditional health insurance provides too much financial protection from medical expenses. They also think that the Affordable Care Act will make this situation worse. That's one reason they want to repeal it.

 

Model Legislation Drafted for Out-of-Network Balance Billing

Amednews, March 29, 2011

 

As several states consider whether, or how, to restrict balance billing by out-of-network physicians, the National Conference of Insurance Legislators on March 6 adopted model legislation on the issue.

 

Nurses to Play a Greater Role in Healthcare

LA Times, March 29, 2011

 

Although this year's Match Day placed more physicians in primary care residencies than last year (which itself was an improvement on 2009), the American Association of Medical Colleges estimates that the US could still face a shortage of 45,000 primary care physicians by the end of the decade.

 

Health Insurance Exchanges Already Making  Waves

Kaiser Health News, March 30, 2011

 

It seems like a simple idea: create new marketplaces, called "exchanges," where consumers can comparison shop for health insurance, sort of like shopping online for a hotel room or airline ticket. But, like almost everything else connected with the health overhaul law, state-based insurance "exchanges" are embroiled in politics.

 

Hefty Insurance Exec Payouts Distract Public, Madden Doctors

Fierce Health Payer, March 25, 2011

 

It just seems like common sense that when you ask someone to reduce their spending, you shouldn't be seen throwing around your own money as if it grows on trees. This, unfortunately, doesn't seem to be a lesson that health insurers have learned.

 

The Model of the Future?  

The Wall Street Journal, March 28, 2011

 

The 2010 health-care law encourages the development of accountable-care organizations as a way to improve care & reduce costs. So what exactly are ACOs?

 

CBO: MA Enrollment to Dive Under Reform  

Insurance News Net, March 23, 2011

 

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans is projected to plunge more than 25.6% over the next decade as a result of changes in the ACA, according to a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office study.

 

U.S. Widens Probe of Blue Cross Plans

The Wall Street Journal, March 26, 2011

 

The U.S. Justice Department is widening a probe of BCBS health insurance plans in several states, examining whether they are effectively raising health-insurance premiums by striking agreements with hospitals that stifle competition from rival insurers.

 

Most Primary-Care Physician Practices May Be Too Small To Measure Quality Adequately   

Health Resource Publishing, March 28, 2011

 

Rethinking the approach to performance measurement in ambulatory care may be necessary for Medicare if the US is to reverse the high & rising costs of healthcare, even as evidence grows that quality is lagging.

 

More Opt for Low-Cost Coverage

The Boston Globe, March 25, 2011

 

Some people in these plans indeed spent significantly less on their medical care, compared with families with more traditional coverage, but they also cut back on preventive health care, such as cancer screenings and childhood vaccinations.

 

Patients Flock to Facebook for Health Care Needs

The Dayton Business Journal, March 20, 2011

 

Interacting with friends, posting photos and updating status changes are common practices on Facebook. But now more users are relying on the social networking site for health information.

 

HHS Unveils National Quality Strategy

Health Leaders Media, March 22, 2011

 

The DHHS on Monday unveiled a 3-pronged National Quality Strategy that calls for developing patient-centered care, reducing costs & improving general public health by supporting "proven interventions" that address unhealthy behavioral, social & environmental issues.

 

Stage 2 of EMR Bonus Program Seen as Too Onerous

Amednews, March 21, 2011

 

Medical associations are warning that overly strict meaningful use criteria proposed by the DHHS for the next phase of the Medicare and Medicaid electronic medical records incentive program could dissuade physicians from participating.

 

Medicare Panel Recommends 1% Physician Pay Boost in 2012

Amednews, March 21, 2011

 

Lawmakers should increase Medicare payment rates to physicians & prevent a massive across-the-board cut set for 2012, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission recommended in its annual March report to Congress.

 

New Medical Home Accreditation Guidelines Emphasize Health IT

Fierce Health IT, March 10, 2011

 

Four medical societies have released a new set of guidelines for organizations accrediting patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) that are more specific about health IT considerations than their original joint statement on the medical home concept, which came out in 2007.

 

Health Law Funding: GOP Sticking Point In Spending Bill

Kaiser Health News, March 15, 2011

 

Some House and Senate Republicans have said they will vote against a three-week funding measure for the federal government because it does not take steps to stop funding for implementation of the health care law.

 

Health Reform Has Helped More Than 4.5 Million Americans Who Rely On Retiree Coverage

Insurance News Net, March 3, 2011

 

The U.S. DHHS provided an update on implementation of the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program in health reform. As of the end of 2010, more than 5,000 employers received more than $535 million in health benefit reimbursements.

 

Blue Cross CEO Got $8.6m in Exit Deal

The Boston Globe, March 2, 2011

 

Cleve L. Killingsworth, who abruptly resigned last March as chief executive of the nonprofit Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, collected $8.6 million in compensation from the state’s largest health insurer in 2010.

 

Narrow Network Plans May Help Insurers' Bottom Line

Fierce Health Payer, March 4, 2011

 

An increasingly popular way to control rising healthcare costs has become so-called narrow network plans in which businesses and individuals get a sizeable break on their premiums by agreeing to only have access to a limited network of doctors and hospitals.

 

From California To The New York Island, A New Understanding Of Higher Medicare Spending  

Kaiser Health News, March 8, 2011

 

Some regions of the country that have been lambasted for high levels of Medicare spending actually are below the national average once the severity of patient sickness and special local expenses are taken into account, according to data from a new government analysis.

 

The Conundrum of Capitalizing ACOs

Fierce Health Care, March 8, 2011

 

Much of the debate over the Medicare shared savings program and their contracting ACOs has focused on the forms of provider risk sharing, patient attribution methodologies and whether beneficiary consent should be obtained.

 

AMA Welcomes Court Decision Supporting New Law Clarifying Red Flags Rule

AMA, March 7, 2011

 

A federal appeals court issued a decision that further validates the AMA's long-standing argument to the FTC that physicians who bill after rendering services are not subject to the red flags rule as creditors.

 

Medicaid Is Worse Than No Coverage at All

The Wall Street Journal, March 10, 2011

 

Across the country, cash-strapped states are leveling blanket cuts on Medicaid providers that are turning the health program into an increasingly hollow benefit.

 

Physicians, Patient Advocates Differ Over Quality Measurements

The Connecticut Mirror, March 7, 2011

 

Physician Compare might not seem like the kind of tool that would spark a divisive policy debate. It's a website, recently launched by Medicare officials & allows patients to find a cardiologist, a pediatrician, or other Medicare provider in their zip code.

 

Some Medical Practices Move To Monthly Membership Fees For Patients

Kaiser Health News, March 8, 2011

 

Under the current insurance model, doctors get paid for procedures and tests rather than for time spent with patients, which makes doctors and patients alike unhappy and increases costs.

 

Tech Companies Pushing Telehealth into the Spotlight

Connected World Mag., February 28, 2011

 

The concept of telehealth has made sense to the M2M world for a while, recent movements by some major manufacturers are helping push the connected concept into mainstream reality. GE and Intel’s recent “Care Innovation” venture was one of the first notable advancements.

 

ACA Consumer Disclosure Notices to Bring Unprecedented Level of Transparency to Health Insurance Marketplace

CMS, March 7 ,2011

 

The CMS published proposed consumer disclosure notices, required by the Affordable Care Act, that insurers would be required to complete and report electronically when they propose rate increases over 10%.

 

Intuit Health Survey: Americans Worried About Costs; Want Greater Access to Physicians

Insurance News Net, March 2, 2011

 

73% of Americans surveyed would use a secure online communication solution to make it easier to get lab results, request appointments, pay medical bills & communicate with their doctor’s office.

 

Health Reform Has Helped More Than 4.5 Million Americans Who Rely On Retiree Coverage

Insurance News Net, March 3, 2011

 

The U.S. DHHS provided an update on implementation of the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program in health reform. As of the end of 2010, more than 5,000 employers received more than $535 million in health benefit reimbursements.

 

Blue Cross CEO Got $8.6m in Exit Deal

Boston.com, March 2, 2011

 

Cleve L. Killingsworth, who abruptly resigned last March as chief executive of the nonprofit Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, collected $8.6 million in compensation from the state’s largest health insurer in 2010.

 

Narrow Network Plans May Help Insurers' Bottom Line

Fierce Health Payer, March 4, 2011

 

An increasingly popular way to control rising healthcare costs has become so-called narrow network plans in which businesses and individuals get a sizeable break on their premiums by agreeing to only have access to a limited network of doctors and hospitals.

 

Health-Care Centerpiece in Law Lacks Clarity, FTC Member Says

Bloomberg, March 3, 2011

 

Thomas Rosch, a Republican member of the FTC, urged the Obama administration to clarify a centerpiece of the new health-care law that raises antitrust issues.

 

HHS To Governors: You Have Flexibility On Health Reform

Kaiser Health News, February 25, 2011

 

Implementation With the nation’s governors about to descend on Washington for their winter meeting, the HHS today continued its campaign to calm concerns that the health law is too expensive & complex for cash-strapped states to implement.

 

One in Five Think Health Reform Not Law

The Hill, February 24, 2011

 

About one in five Americans believe, inaccurately, that last year’s sweeping healthcare reform law was wiped out when House Republicans voted to repeal it in January, according to a new poll.

 

Value-Based Health Benefit Increases Employee Engagement

Health Resources Online, February 22, 2011

 

In today’s austere economy, American workers’ attention is focused on spending less & saving more, according to recent research from the Principal Financial Well-Being Index.

 

States Turn to Private Insurance Companies for Managed Care

USA Today, February 21, 2011

 

Two years after Holly Hawthorne was severely brain damaged when her motorcycle was hit by a bus in India, she passed a huge milestone in January: She moved out of a nursing home here and into the house where she grew up. Her mother, Diane Allison, credits Hawthorne's managed care health plan for making the move possible.

 

Profits Keep Rolling in for Big Insurers Despite Reform

Amednews, February 21, 2011

 

Profits at the nation's seven largest publicly traded insurers went up in 2010 as plans spent less on care and used income to buy back their stock to boost per-share earnings. Net earnings rose in 2010 compared with 2009 for six of the seven largest shareholder-owned plans.

 

Obama Budget Would Delay Medicare Pay Cuts

Amednews, February 21, 2011

 

President Obama's fiscal 2012 budget proposal would freeze current Medicare pay rates for physicians until 2014, spreading the $54 billion cost of the freeze over a decade in part by squeezing savings from drug manufacturers and states.

 

EMRs, Quality Efforts Key to Viability of Practices, Obama Officials Advise

Amednews, February 21, 2011

 

Physicians who fail to tackle quality improvement, adopt electronic medical records and embrace teamwork risk being at a competitive disadvantage with doctors who join the modern era of health care, federal officials warned physicians at the AMA National Advocacy Conference in Washington, D.C.

 

Some Docs May Use Twitter for 'Unprofessional' Messages

Usnews.com, February 17, 2011

 

Some doctors post unethical and unprofessional content on Twitter, a finding that suggests the need for more oversight of physicians' use of social media, according to a recent study.

 

S&P: US Healthcare Costs Up 6% in 2010, But Growth Slowing

Health Leaders, February 18, 2011

 

The average per capita cost of healthcare services covered by commercial health plans and Medicare programs rose 6.06% in 2010, matching the lowest growth rates in four years, and continuing seven consecutive months of cost growth deceleration, according to the Standard & Poor's Healthcare Economic Indices.

 

Few Physicians Can Avoid Dominant Health

Insurers

Amdenews, February 21, 2011

 

When health insurance companies want to renew or set new contracts with Pikes Peak Urology in Colorado Springs, Colo., they simply don't dictate a fee schedule & send it over for a physician's signature. Urologist Jeff Moody, MD, who works at the four-physician practice, said that's because no one insurer in Colorado Springs has the market power to dictate payment rates.

 

5 Ways to Improve PFP From the CEO, CMO & COO of Advocate Health Care

Becker’s Hospital Review, February 15, 2011

 

In 2002, Oak Brook, Ill.-based Advocate Health Care's major payor indicated it was only interested in giving increases if they were related to demonstrated value. In response, Advocate Physician Partners leadership created a clinical integration program and asked the payor to fund a pay-for-performance program for physicians confident that it would demonstrate value.

 

Texas Presses For Money-Saving Medicaid Changes

Kaiser Health News, February 18, 2011

 

A few months ago, Gov. Perry led a group of Texas lawmakers threatening to drop out of Medicaid, the state-federal health care program for the poor.

 

Meaning of Ruling Is Sought

Wall Street Journal, February 18, 2011

 

The Justice Department on Thursday asked a federal judge to clarify the immediate impact of his ruling last month that declared the new health-care law unconstitutional.

 

Primary Care, Specialists Salary Gap Narrowing

Managed Care Information Center, February 15, 2011

 

The salary gap between primary care & specialty physicians is beginning to close. That’s the conclusion of a study by the Detroit office of Sullivan, Cotter and Associates Inc.

 

7 Medical Error Disclosure Deterrents

HealthLeaders Media, February 9, 2011

 

The admission of making a mistake resulting in damage to patient trust & threat of litigation is a weight on the minds of all physicians. Failing to address the values of error, near miss & unsafe condition reporting with residents is detrimental to both the institution and the trainee.

 

Insurers' Out-of-Network Pay Changes Likely Mean They Will Pay Less for Care

Amednews, February 14, 2011

 

Physicians who are outside big insurers' networks in several states can expect health plans to pay even less of the cost of their services as Medicare rates replace fee schedules based on "usual, customary & reasonable" rates, doctors organizations say.

 

FTC, Justice Department Struggle to Compromise on Antitrust Guidance for ACOs

Beckers Hospital Review, February 11, 2011

 

Letters from an influential Republican member of the FTC to the White House and CMS suggest a struggle between the FTC and DOJ to compromise on antitrust issues surrounding ACOs, according to the New York Times.

 

FAQ: The Shrinking Medicare Doughnut Hole

Kaiser Health News, February 11, 2011

 

The widely unpopular "doughnut hole", the coverage gap in the Medicare drug benefit is headed for oblivion, under the new health law. Beginning this year, seniors who hit the doughnut hole will get substantial discounts on both brand-name and generic drugs.

 

UnitedHealth Hit With $1M Hartford Labor Claim

Hartford Business, February 7, 2011

 

UnitedHealthcare must pay more than $1 million in back wages and penalties for failing to pay overtime to 479 Hartford employees, authorities said.

 

Analyst Predicts Flat Initial Medicare Rates

Bloomberg, February 9, 2011

 

Initial 2012 reimbursement rates for Medicare Advantage plans should be roughly flat, which tops the consensus expectation of a 2% drop, according to Citi analyst Carl McDonald said Tuesday in a research note.

 

The Bigger the Physician Group the Better the Care, Study Finds

MCIC, February 9, 2011

 

Large multispecialty groups and organized healthcare delivery systems deliver higher quality care at a lower cost than other providers in their market regions.

 

PCPs: Be on the Lookout for Incentive Checks

Fierce Practice Management, February 9, 2011

 

Another reason to look forward to spring, if you're a PCP. Those who qualify for primary care incentive payments under the new health law should expect to see their first bonus checks arrive in their offices sometime after March 31.

 

Vermont Gov. Proposes Single-Payer Health Plan

Kaiser Health News, February 8, 2011

 

Vermont Gov. Peter Shumlin, elected last November after promising to reform health care in the state, unveiled a bill  Tuesday to abolish most forms of private health insurance and move state residents into a publicly funded insurance pool.

 

As Health Care Law Rolls Out, Many Insurers Drop Child-Only Policies

Miami Herald, February 8, 2011

 

As arguments about the constitutionality of health care reform reverberate through courtrooms in Florida and across the nation, two provisions that have already kicked in are sparking opposite reactions from insurers.

 

Humana Posts Big Drop in 4Q Earnings

NPR, February  7, 2011

 

Humana's fourth-quarter earnings fell 57% as operations were weighed down by expenses partly associated with its Medicare offerings and an expansion into health care delivery.

 

Medicare Pay Panel Latest Target of GOP Effort to Repeal Reform Law

Amednews, February 7, 2011

 

Congressional Republicans continued their offensive against the national health system reform law by introducing a bill that would eliminate the Medicare Independent Payment Advisory Board. The board could mandate physician pay cuts starting in about 4 years.

 

Medical Liability: Health Reform's Next Step

Amednews, February 7, 2011

 

Congress should pass the HEALTH Act to restrain health spending growth while preserving patient access to high-quality physician care. No matter where a policymaker stands on health reform, one common theme that emerges in any discussion about overhauling the health system is the need to reduce spending growth while ensuring access to quality care.

 

Cigna Profit Tops Street View; 2011 Outlook Short

Reuters, February 3, 2011

 

Health insurer Cigna posted a higher-than-expected fourth-quarter profit as Americans cut their use of medical services to save money, but the company forecast 2011 earnings below Wall Street's target.

 

Online Healthcare Information is More Popular Than Ever

FierceHealthIT, February 2,  2011

 

Searching for healthcare information is now the third most common reason for going online, just behind checking email and using search engines, according to a poll conducted last August & September by the Pew Internet Project and the California HealthCare Foundation.

 

ACOs Can Work with Physicians in Charge

Amednews, January 31, 2011

 

A hospital partner may not be necessary for an ACO to be effective, according to a report analyzing a primary care-led ACO. Physicians increasingly are selling their practices to hospitals, which are buying in preparation for the development of ACOs & other aspects of health system reform.

 

Healthcare Lobbies Increased Spending in 2010

Kaiser Health News, January 27, 2010

 

Amidst last year's battle over healthcare reform & Medicare payments to physicians, the AMA ratcheted up its spending on lobbying, reports Kaiser Health News. The Chicago-based AMA spent just under $22 million on lobbying activities in 2010, up nearly 9% from 2009, making it the largest spender for lobbying operations among healthcare groups.

 

Health Law’s Uncertainty Leads to Worries on Care Limits

The New York Times, February 1, 2010

 

With a court decision on Monday declaring the health care law unconstitutional and Republicans intent on repealing at least parts of it, thousands of Americans with major illnesses are facing the renewed prospect of losing their health insurance coverage.

 

Insurers Say Merger Would Cut Health Costs

The Boston Globe, January 26, 2011

 

The leaders of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care & Tufts Health Plan said yesterday joining forces will give them the scale to expand across New England and beyond at a time when sweeping changes in the health care industry demand larger & more competitive players.

 

Mediation Offers an Alternative to Malpractice Lawsuits

Kaiser Health News, February 1, 2011

 

When a health-care provider harms instead of heals, patients who seek answers and redress generally face the prospect of a long and costly lawsuit. But there's another option, one that can significantly reduce the toll of a court battle while providing many of the same benefits to patients and their families: mediation.

 

Legislature Increases the Role of Physician Assistants

The Lund Report, January 20, 2011

 

Now physician assistants can be supervised by a panel of physicians regulated by the Oregon Medical Board. Physician assistants (PAs) can now play a larger role in primary care, thanks to legislation passed during the 2010 legislative special session (House Bill 3642), which is being heralded by physicians and the co-founder of a Portland chain of neighborhood healthcare clinics.

 

Losing the fiscal argument on health care, Republicans try to discredit the referees

The Washington Post, January 21, 2011

 

It's the age of civility in American politics, but there's one institution that's been civil all along: the CBO (sorry, but sometimes civility is boring). The nonpartisan agency, which calculates the official cost of legislation for Congress, speaks in the polite language of actuarial tables, refuses to reliably please or disappoint either party & is the closest thing American politics has to an umpire.

 

Quit The Relative Value Scale Update Committee

Kaiser Health News, January 19, 2011

 

Recently, a Wall Street Journal expose and a New York Times column by Princeton economist Uwe Reinhardt detailed how vast health care resources are steered by the American Medical Association’s Relative Value Scale Update Committee -- or RUC, a secretive, 29 person, specialist-dominated panel.

 

Analyst keeps 'attractive' view of health insurers

Yahoo Finance, January 18, 2011

 

A Goldman Sachs analyst said Tuesday he remains bullish on the managed-care sector for several reasons & sees earnings growth topping 10% through 2019 as health care spending rises & more people gain insurance coverage.

 

Repeal And Replace -- But Replace With What?

Kaiser Health News, January 18, 2011

 

The Republicans insist they want not just to repeal the Affordable Care Act but also to replace it. But replace it with what, exactly? It's not an easy question to answer.

 

Exchanges Move Forward While Lawsuits Mount

Insurance News Net, January 17, 2011

 

Some states are moving forward on developing state-run health insurance exchanges as required under the 2010 federal Affordable Care Act, & a couple of the states are inviting producer participation.

 

State fines HMOs $4M

Health News Florida, January 7, 2011

 

Two HMOs have been hit with nearly $4 million in fines after a long-running dispute about whether they improperly denied or reduced speech-therapy services for children in Florida's Medicaid program.

 

Investors see health reform's potential

Politico, January 13, 2011

 

As Republicans push forward on repealing health reform, planning the law’s demise, a different conversation is happening among thousands of health care investors gathered in San Francisco for this week’s J.P Morgan Health Care Conference.

 

Small Business Tax Credits

Health Affairs, January 14, 2011

 

Small businesses frequently face steep premiums for health insurance coverage and, as a result, their workers are more likely to be uninsured than those who work for larger companies. Various provisions of the Affordable Care Act are intended to address the problem.

 

State Legislators Push To Penalize Officials For Implementing Health Overhaul

Kaiser Health News, January 14, 2011

 

Lawmakers in a handful of states have introduced legislation that would criminalize PPACA. No, that's not the acronym for a designer street drug or racketeering syndicate — it's the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the new federal health law, that they're talking about.

 

Health insurers warn against exchange requirements

The Hill, January 13, 2011

 

The health insurance lobby urged federal advisers against recommending specific "essential" items or services that must be included in health plans offered on new insurance exchanges starting up in 2014.

 

Healthcare safety nets kept intact with help from Washington

LA Times, January 12, 2011

 

Bolstered by billions of dollars in aid from Washington, states managed to hold their healthcare safety nets together last year despite the fallout from the recession, a new survey shows.

 

Aetna’s finance chief talks health reform

MarketWatch, January 11, 2011

 

With significant changes from the new health-reform law starting to take effect this year, diversification is a popular theme among health insurers presenting their 2011 business strategies to investors this week at the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference in San Francisco. Aetna proved no exception.

 

Complex Care For Obese Could Cut Into Doctor Incentives

Managed Care Information Center, January 11, 2011

 

P4P reimbursement of surgeons, intended to reward doctors and hospitals for good patient outcomes, may instead be creating financial incentives for discriminating against obese patients. This population is much more likely to suffer expensive complications after even the most routine surgeries, according to new Johns Hopkins research.

 

Insurers, health-care providers at odds on rules for 'ACOs'

The Washington Post, January 9, 2011

 

The new health law encourages doctors, hospitals and insurers to team up in treating patients, but these groups already are at odds as they urge the government to set rules protecting their financial interests.

 

Multiple chronic conditions target of new HHS strategy

Amednews, January 10, 2011

 

Acknowledging that the U.S. health care system as structured is geared largely toward treating just one disease or condition at a time, the DHHS recently announced the creation of a public-private effort to tackle the growing challenge presented by multiple chronic conditions.

 

Physician EMR use passes 50% as incentives outweigh resistance

Amednews, January 10, 2011

 

For the first time, a majority of office-based physicians are using an electronic medical records system, according to a survey by the CDC and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. The survey doesn't explain why EMR use in offices rose to 50.7% in 2010, more than double the adoption rate in 2005. However, peer pressure is apparently moving from fighting EMRs to embracing them.

 

New Survey on Employers' Reactions to Health Reform Post Mid-term Elections

PR Newswire, January 3, 2011

 

Midwest Business Group on Health (MBGH) has released the results of a recent national employer survey gauging the reactions and concerns related to health reform after the mid-term November elections. The findings indicate that employers believe the law will increase their benefit costs and changes are needed in the law to improve quality, reduce expenses and reward health system performance.

 

Health system reform expected to boost house calls

Amednews, January 3, 2011

 

For a time during his 17 yrs of running a house call-based practice, the pay was so bad for Tom Cornwell, MD, that his family lived off his wife's income. But physicians like Dr. Cornwell say they are finding themselves much more in demand.

 

Health care reform pays big dividends

Politico, January 5, 2011

 

Health care reform was a big job in 2009 & it paid very well for some executives: Nine of 12 CEOs of health care trade associations made $1 million or more. Lobbyists at the associations received compensation ranging from $250,000 to more than $1 million.

 

Health Care Again Tops the Agenda, This Time of GOP

WSJ, January 5, 2011

 

The new Congress prepared to begin business Wednesday much where lawmakers left off before the November election—battling over the merits of the Democrats' health-care overhaul.

 

Healthcare repeal bill coming before Obama's annual address

The Hill, January 1, 2011

 

The incoming chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee said Sunday that Republicans will bring up a healthcare repeal measure before President Obama even delivers his annual address to Congress this month.

 

Employer-sponsored health coverage protects fewer workers

Amednews, December 27, 2010

 

The percentage of Americans younger than 65 who receive health insurance through their employer has fallen below 60% not only because of high unemployment. It's also because many of those who remained on the job saw their coverage eliminated or reduced, or dropped it themselves because their plan became too expensive.

 

Some Policies Restrict Coverage By Limiting Visits To The Doctor

Kaiser Health News, December 21, 2010

 

When examining your health benefits for the new year, you'll probably notice that your plan has eliminated lifetime and most annual dollar limits on coverage. That was mandated by the federal health-care overhaul. But for some consumers, coverage may still be restricted: Limits on the number of doctor visits or prescriptions or other services continue to be permitted and can stymie patients' efforts to get necessary care.

 

Physician Employment & Beyond: The Current State of Physician Integration

Becker’s Hospital Review, December 21, 2010

 

Just a few years ago, 431-bed Northwest Community Hospital in Arlington Heights, Ill., was focused on nurturing independent physicians who could function at arm's length from the institution. The goal was to have hardy practitioners who could handle reduced reimbursements by setting up their own ancillary businesses, such as office-based testing, to supplement their income.

 

Experts Ponder 'Plan B' Options For The Individual Mandate

Kaiser Health News, December 16, 2010

 

With Republicans vowing to dismantle the health law and courts wrestling with its constitutionality, some health policy experts are pondering a possible "Plan B" in case the individual mandate – the requirement that everyone get health insurance starting in 2014 – is weakened or struck down.

 

Prescription processes may get more tedious in 2011

Fierce Practice Management, December 14, 2010

 

As patients find themselves next month unable to use their flexible spending accounts and other tax-exempt funds to purchase medications without a prescription, physicians may spend more of their time in 2011 writing prescriptions for common over-the-counter medications, American Medical News reports.

 

Medicare Advantage Plans Could Soften Payment Cuts With Rating Program

A.M. Best Company, Inc., December 20, 2010

 

Private Medicare Advantage health plans could soften major payment cuts from the federal government that start in 2012 under U.S. health care reform with a new star ratings program by the U.S. CMS.

 

State Insurance Officials Approve Rules For Descriptions Of Health Policies

Kaiser Health News, December 15, 2010

 

Choosing a health insurance policy should be easier if consumers use the simple chart and other information that state insurance commissioners approved Thursday.

 

A Health-Care Dream Team on a Hunt for the Best Treatments

Wall Street Journal, December 15, 2010

 

Here’s a premise we’ll bet you’ve heard before: If only the rest of the country could deliver the kind of high-quality, low-cost medical care that such organizations as the Mayo Clinic and Intermountain Healthcare provide, America’s health-care problems would be solved.

 

A Model For Integrating Independent Physicians Into Accountable Care Organizations

Health Affairs, December 2010

 

Advocate Physician partners, an organization of over 3,500 physicians, created a new kind of accountable care model by organizing physicians into partnerships with hospitals to improve care, cut costs and be held accountable for the results.

 

Courts may not get last word in health care fight

The Washington Post, December 16, 2010

 

Opponents of President Obama's health care overhaul law are a cheering a federal court ruling that one of its core provisions is unconstitutional. They may not realize that Obama has a fallback option that also could do the job.

 

Anthem, Regence denied rate hike requests

The Hartford Courant, December 3, 2010

 

The Connecticut Insurance Department has rejected a 20%  rate hike proposed by Anthem BCBS, calling the request "excessive," according to the Hartford Courant. The department's analysis upheld many of the assumptions made by Anthem to justify an increase, but not the claims trend.

 

Congress passes bills keeping physicians from Medicare pay cut, "red flags" rule

Amednews, December 13, 2010

 

Congress has voted to block a Medicare physician pay cut through 2011. In another closely watched physician issue, lawmakers exempted doctors from the so-called red flags rule on security of financial data. Dec. 9, the House passed a bill that prevents any Medicare physician payment cuts through 2011

 

Following the Money, Doctors Ration Care

New York Times, December 11, 2010

 

UNEQUAL access to health care is hardly a new phenomenon in the US, but the country is moving toward rationing on a scale that is unprecedented. Wealthy people will always be able to buy most of what they want. But for everyone else if we stay on the current course the lines are likely to get longer & longer.

 

Deal reached to fix Medicare doc pay

Politico, December 7, 2010

 

Senate leaders have reached a tentative, one-year deal on the Medicare “doc-fix,” sources close to the negotiations say. The deal pays for the must-pass patch to prevent a deep cut in Medicare doctors’ payments with changes in the tax subsidy program that some consumers will use after 2014 to buy health insurance on the new exchanges.

 

Aetna buys data-network firm Medicity for $500 mln

Reuters, Decenber 7, 2010

 

Aetna said it would pay about $500 million for privately held Medicity, which provides technology to exchange health information, in the latest sign that U.S. health insurers want to diversify.

 

MedPAC Warns of HMO-Like Backlash to ACOs

Beckers Hospital Review, December 6, 2010

 

In a letter to CMS, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission warned that patients might have the same negative reaction to accountable care organizations as it did to HMOs some 15 years ago, according to a report by the Hill.

 

HHS spells out final medical-loss ratio rules

Amednews, December 6, 2010

 

The HHS Dept. issued final regulations Nov. 22 on what health insurers must do to meet medical-loss ratio requirements as part of the new health system reform law. Starting in Jan 2011, if health plans don't spend enough of their premium dollars on medical care and quality improvement, they must provide a rebate to customers in 2012.

 

McSurance on Trial

Slate, December 1, 2010

 

Sen. Jay Rockefeller chaired a Dec. 1 commerce committee hearing, "Are Mini Med  Policies Really Health Insurance?" That question answers itself. With payout ceilings of $25,000, $10,000, $5,000,  even $2,000, a mini-med policy is like a fire-insurance policy that covers only the items on your front stoop.

 

Physicians say preauthorizations harm patient care

Fierce Practice Management, November 24, 2010

 

It's no secret that physicians are frequently frustrated by insurers' preauthorization requirements, but a new AMA survey of about 2,400 physicians quantifies their opinions on the subject.

 

Embracing Incentives for Efficient Health Care

WSJ, November 28, 2010

 

Spurred by incentives in the federal health-overhaul law, hospitals & doctors are beginning to create new entities that aim to provide more efficient health care. These efforts are already raising questions about whether they can truly save money, or if they might actually drive costs higher.

 

What new insurance provisions on preventive care mean for your practice

Amednews, November 29, 2010

 

The health system reform law requires an increasing number of insurance plans to cover 100% of widely accepted preventive health care without co-pays or coinsurance. Experts say this will complicate collecting the appropriate patient portion.

 

Low-Income Families Hit Harder by High Deductibles

Businessweek, November 23, 2010

 

Low-income American families with high-deductible health plans are more likely to delay or forgo medical care due to cost than high-income families with similar coverage, a new study finds.

 

Health care's dilemma: Competition or collaboration?

The Washington Post, November 23, 2010

 

These days, most health reformers can agree about two things. They believe, based on pretty good evidence, that growing concentration among insurers, hospitals, pharmacy benefit managers & drug companies helps explain why health-care costs are rising faster than the cost of everything else

 

CMS Introduces New Center for  Innovation

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, November 16, 2010

 

CMS today formally established the new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (Innovation Center). Created by the Affordable Care Act, the Innovation Center will examine new ways of delivering health care and paying health care providers that can save money for Medicare and Medicaid while improving the quality of care.

 

Web-Based Electronic Health Record Safety Registry Launches

WSJ, November 15, 2010

 

Electronic health records are on the way — thanks to big financial incentives included in the stimulus bill — but they can also cause unforeseen effects and errors.

 

Health Care Reform for Business Owners

Inc., November 11, 2010

 

Thank heavens the windows were sealed because our recent Inc. Business Owners Council "New Member Invitational" on the subject of healthcare reform's impact on business owners was positively depressing.

 

Debt Panel Floats Public Option for Health Care

WSJ, November 10, 2010

 

Creating a public health insurance option — perhaps the most contentious idea of last year’s health overhaul debate — is among the possible solutions for reducing federal spending outlined in today’s debt commission report.

 

Is UnitedHealth Interested in Acquiring Physician Practices?

Corporate Research Group, November 10, 2010

 

Two separate readers — on opposite sides of the nation — have now asked me if there’s any truth to rumors that UnitedHealth is interested in acquiring physician practices as a stepping stone into accountable care organizations.

 

Taming the ‘Wild West’ of Outpatient Surgery - Doctors’ Offices

WSJ, October 26, 2010

 

Minimally invasive surgical procedures and new anesthesia techniques at outpatient facilities are making it easier than ever before to have surgery - -but recovery can still take weeks or months, putting the onus on the patient

 

6 Ways Hospitals Can Legally Provide Financial Support to Physicians

Becker’s Hospital Review, November 2, 2010

 

As reimbursements continue to decline, physicians may look to hospitals for financial support beyond the compensation they receive for clinical services.

 

Elections over, organized medicine begins Medicare payment campaign

Amednews, November 8, 2010

 

The American Medical Association and others in organized medicine say they are pushing for a Medicare pay solution that would prevent any threatened cuts through 2011.

 

Nobody’s Using Their Health Insurance–But HMOs Aren’t Offering Refunds

Forbes, November 8, 2010

 

Earnings season has been a good one this year for health insurers. The recession means that patients are delaying surgeries, avoiding the doctor and filling fewer prescriptions.

 

Obama administration retools new health program

The Washington Post, November 5, 2010

 

The Obama administration said Nov 5 it will cut premiums & upgrade coverage in a new health plan for people with medical problems, because enrollment has been disappointingly low.

 

Will Uncertainty About Healthcare Reform Chill Innovation?

InformationWeek, November 4, 2010

 

With newly elected Republicans in Congress pledging to repeal President Obama's healthcare reform, you've got to wonder whether those threats will stymie healthcare providers and IT vendors.

 

Health Benefits Appear On Rise

WSJ, November 2, 2010

 

The number of small businesses offering health insurance to workers is projected to increase sharply this year, recent data show, a shift that researchers attribute to a tax credit in the health law. Many small businesses, however, remain opposed to the law. Some small businesses are benefiting from portions of the law, which includes a tax credit beginning this year that covers as much as 35% of a company's insurance premiums. According to a report by Bernstein Research in New York, the percentage of employers with between three and nine workers and which are offering insurance has increased to 59% this year, up from 46% last year. The report relies on data from a September survey by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.

 

Physicians face painful decision on Medicare

Washington Post, November 1, 2010

 

While most people are focused on the midterm elections Tuesday, the American Medical Association is gearing up for the lame-duck congressional session scheduled to start Nov. 15. Unless Congress intervenes, payments to doctors for treating Medicare patients  will be cut by 23% on Dec. 1 and another 6.5% on Jan. 1.

ICD-10 Spurs Overdue Healthcare Technology Change

AHIP HI-WIRE - October 28, 2010

 

Healthcare Payors face a strategic dilemma: remediate outdated legacy systems to handle ICD-10 coding or replace with next-generation technology that can handle not only ICD-10 codes, but fundamental business changes that are transforming the healthcare industry.

 

Mysteries of 'meaningful use' deter some physicians from adopting EHRs

ModernMedicine, Ronald Wheeland, M.D.

October 26, 2010

 

A lot of physicians are scrambling to convert their paper medical records into digital electronic ones. This is due to the fact that Congress recently passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

 

More Employers Seek Health-Quality Data

The Wichita Eagle via Insurance News Net

October 10, 2010

 

Information about quality is beginning to be considered by some employers as they make purchasing decisions about health care, particularly care provided in hospitals.

 

 

Doctors' Notes: A Must Read for Patients

RWJF, December 19, 2011

 

Patients are enthusiastic about embracing access to their medical notes, while doctors are cautious. That’s one of the key findings from a new study in the Annals of Internal Medicine reporting on OpenNotes.

 

Physician Perspectives About Health Care Reform and the Future of the Medical Profession

Deloitte, December 2011

 

A representive random sample of U.S. physicians surveyed to understand their attitudes toward health reform and how it may impact the future practice of medicine.

 

The Independent Payment Advisory Board

RWJF, December 15, 2011

 

A new policy brief from Health Affairs and the RWJF, authored by Politico’s Jennifer Haberkorn, explores the ACA’s Independent Payment Advisory Board.

 

Survey of Physicians Highlights Overlooked Connection Between Social Needs and Health

RWJF, December 8, 2011

 

Physicians Believe Addressing Patients' Social Needs Is As Important As Addressing Their Medical Conditions.

 

Using Data to Drive State Improvement in Enrollment and Retention Performance

RWJF, November 2011

 

A new report released by the RWJF provides states with recommendations on how to best use available data to drive enrollment and retention in public insurance programs like Medicaid and CHIP.

 

Electronic Health Record Systems and Intent to Apply for Meaningful Use Incentives Among Office-based Physician Practices: U.S. 2001–2011

CDC, November 2011

 

Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

 

Physicians Face Disconnects at Point-of-Care

Holters Kluwer, November 2011

 

Wolters Kluwer Health has launched a Point-of-Care survey, conducted by IPSOS, to uncover “disconnects” at the point of care focusing on challenges in the areas of the doctor-patient relationship.

 

Is Bigger Better When it Comes to Government Health Spending?

RWJF, November 7, 2011

 

52% of Americans, prefer a bigger government providing more health services, while just 37% support a smaller government providing fewer health services.

 

Medicaid And The Unisured

Kaiser Family Foundation, October 2011

 

Medicaid has evolved to become our nation’s primary payer for long-term services & supports,  financing nearly half (43%) of all spending on long-term care services.

 

Why Not the Best?

Common Wealth Fund, October, 2011

 

Results from the National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

 

The Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project (CPDP)

RWJF, September 2011

 

Ten Criteria for Meaningful and Usable Measures of Performance

 

The Role of Exchanges in Quality Improvement

RWJF, September 2011

 

A new report identifies options states could pursue to use the health insurance exchanges to help drive health care quality improvement and delivery system reform.

 

The Role of Exchanges in Quality Improvement

RWJF, September 2011

 

A report identifies options states could pursue to use the health insurance exchanges to help drive health care quality improvement and delivery system reform.

 

State-Level Health Insurance Coverage Estimates from the 2009 American Community Survey

RWJF, July 2011

 

This issue brief provides state-level estimates of health insurance coverage by age and income from the American Community Survey (ACS).

 

Physician Office Usage Of Electronic Health Records Software

SK&A, July 2011

 

The number of physician practices that adopted EHRs has increased from 38.7% in Oct 2010 to 40.4% in July of this year, according to a recent study.

 

Most- And Least-Expensive Healthcare Markets in US

Thomson Reuters, August 2011

 

Study Finds Spending Gap of $4,600 per Person. A recent study released has found vast differences from one city to the next in the amount spent on healthcare for Americans with employer-sponsored health plans.

 

Modest Acceleration in US Healthcare Costs

McGraw Hill, August 18, 2011

 

Data released by S&P Indices for the S&P Healthcare ECI indicate that the average per capita cost of healthcare services covered by commercial insurance and Medicare programs increased by 5.61% over the 12-months ending June 2011.

 

Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty

The New England Journal of Medicine, August 18, 2011

 

The New England Journal of Medicine has released this study that attempts to measure the economic and emotional impact of medical malpractice cases on doctors.

 

Will the Patient-Centered Medical Home Transform the Delivery of Health Care?

RWJF, August 2011

 

A new report funded by the RWJF reveals infrastructure and health IT alone won't be enough to be recognized and reimbursed as a medical home for long.

 

Analysis of HHS Proposed Rules on Reinsurance, Risk Corridors and Risk Adjustment

RWJF, August 2011

 

This brief by Wakely Consulting Group examines the proposed rules, which apply standards for reinsurance, risk corridors and risk adjustment.

 

Patient-Centered Medical Home Poised to Transform Health Care

RWJF, August 9, 2011

 

A policy paper that examines the promise of the medical home model of care concludes it has the potential to transform health care delivery, but that organizations promoting the model should tread carefully.

 

Physicians Of All Ages Frustrated With Delayed Retirement

Jackson & Coker, August 2, 2011

 

As recently reported by FierceHealthcare, the recent U.S. recession has forced many physicians to delay or even come out of retirement.

 

The U.S. Health System in Perspective: A Comparison of Twelve Industrialized Nation

Commonwealth Fund, July 2011

 

The US continues to outspend the rest of the world's 12 most advanced nations on healthcare by a wide margin, according to the latest Commonwealth Fund study. The latest data continues to be a wake-up call for hospital exeutives to try and rethink their cost equations.

 

National Health Spending Projections Through 2020: Economic Recovery And Reform Drive Faster Spending Growth

Health Affairs, July 2011

 

In 2010, US health spending is estimated to have grown at a historic low of 3.9 percent, due in part to the effects of the recently ended recession. In 2014, national health spending growth is expected to reach 8.3 percent when major coverage expansions from the Affordable Care Act of 2010 begin.

 

Changes in Skilled Nursing Facilities Billing in Fiscal Year 2011

HSS.gov, July 8, 2011

 

The HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has urged the CMS to take immediate action on the way skilled nursing facilities bill for concurrent and high-level therapies.

 

Seeking Social Solace: How Patients Use Social Media to Disclose Medical Diagnoses Online

Russell Herder, July 2011

 

When patients are diagnosed with a new acute or chronic illness, the Internet is often one of the first places they share the news when they get home from the doctor's office.

 

2011 Physician  Compensation Survey

The Medicus Firm, June 26, 2011

 

The average change in physician compensation from 2009 to 2010 was -0.14% across all 19 specialties surveyed, compared to an average change of +4.9% the previous year.

 

Tablets Set to Change Medical Practice

QuantiaMD, June 15, 2011

 

A study of more than 3,700 physicians sheds light on the new ways doctors are embracing mobile technology.

 

Down the Rabbit Hole of Recertification

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Summer 2011

 

While most physicians are dedicated to constantly improving their skills, increasingly costly bureaucratic demands for recertification may cause many to say “Enough!” just as baby boomers retire & physician shortage looms.

 

Understanding U.S. Health Care Spending

NIHCM  Foundation, July 2011

 

Number of Americans With Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Drops Significantly Over Last Decade

RWJF, June 21, 2011

 

Small employers will likely increase offers of insurance—and their premium costs will fall—under the Affordable Care Act.

 

Employers Face 8.5% Increase in Health-Care Costs in 2012

PwC, May 2011

 

Employers will likely face health-care cost increases of 8.5% in 2012, but they’ll mitigate that burden by pushing more costs onto employees and making other changes to benefits, a PricewaterhouseCoopers report finds.

 

Realizing Health Reform’s Potential: Will the ACA Make Health Insurance Affordable?

The Common Health Fund, April  2011

 

Using a budget-based approach to measuring affordability, this issue brief explores whether the subsidies available through the Affordable Care Act are enough to make health insurance affordable for low-income families.

 

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Care Public Perception Index: March 2011

RWJF, April 29, 2011

 

Americans’ confidence in their ability to afford future care & maintain health coverage fell slightly March 2011. The RWJF Health Care Public Perception Index decreased from 100.2 points in Feb to 99.6 points in March.

 

New Brief Highlights that Higher Health Care Costs Do Not Necessarily Equal Higher Quality

RWJF, April 21, 2011

 

Although the U.S. spends more per person on health care than any other nation, the quality of that care frequently falls far short of what it should.

 

Medical Malpractice - April 2011 Update

RWJF, April 2011

 

Although the malpractice crisis—the inability of health care providers to obtain affordable liability insurance—has abated in many states, medical liability costs & pressures remain a concern.

 

High Performance Accountable Care: Building on Success & Learning from Experience

The Commowealth Fund, April 14, 2011

 

A key provision of the Affordable Care Act is the establishment of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, which provides incentives for improved quality & efficiency to a new category of provider—the ACO.

 

Issue Briefs: Project Works to Develop Cost Measures, Aggregate Data on Physician Performance and Increase Equity

RWJF, March 15, 2011

 

Three issue briefs detail the work of the High-Value Health Care Project and deliver lessons about how the U.S. health care system can yield higher value and quality.

 

Consensus Report Emphasized ACOs, Medical Homes and the Triple Aim   

Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative, March 2011

 

To support better care while reducing or controlling costs, ACOs and medical homes will need to emphasize ways that the healthcare community can enhance access, promote better care coordination, use health information technology better, and apply coordinated payments.

 

Healthcare Spending & Preventive Care in High-Deductible & Consumer-Directed Health Plans

RWJ, March 2011

 

A study, funded by RWJF and the California HealthCare Foundation, investigates the effects of high-deductible, consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs) on health care spending and the use of preventive care.

 

Regulating the Medical Loss Ratio

RWJF, March 2011

 

A study, funded by the RWJF Changes in Health Care Financing and Organization  program looks at the potential impact of medical loss ratios (MLRs) on the individual health insurance market.

 

State Variation in Primary Care Physician Supply: Implications for Health Reform Medicaid Expansions    

RWJF, March 17, 2011

 

A new study finds that in much of the country, Medicaid enrollment expansion under health reform is likely to greatly outpace growth in the number of PCPs willing to treat these new patients.

 

Employers and Health Care Reform

RWJF, March 9, 2011

 

Starting in 2014, the Affordable Care Act will require mid- and large-sized companies to make payments to the federal government if they do not offer health insurance to their employees and dependents. This employer requirement is high-profile & one of the law’s more controversial elements.

 

Health, US, 2010," Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics  

CDC.gov, February 2011

 

Health, United States, 2010 is the 34th report on the health status of the Nation and is submitted by the Secretary of the DHHS to the President and the Congress of the US.

 

Resources Examine Recession-Driven Record Medicaid Enrollment & Assess Medicaid Spending Growth

Kaiser Family Foundation, February 23, 2011

 

Three papers on Medicaid & the Uninsured examine Medicaid enrollment and spending during the recent recession. The analyses show Medicaid enrollment rose above 50 million people nationally for the first time in 2010, reflecting the program’s counter-cyclical role of helping people who become uninsured when the economy falters, with many turning to Medicaid after losing jobs & employer-based health insurance.

The papers include:

Medicaid Spending Growth Over The Last Decade and the Great Recession, 2000 to 2009

Medicaid Spending Growth and the Great Recession, 2007-2009 (A Fact Sheet)

Medicaid Enrollment June 2010 Data Snapshot

 

Medicare Quality Measurement and Reporting Programs

HealthReformGPS, February 9, 2011

 

Health care quality represents a constantly recurring theme in U.S. health policy. What is it? How do we measure it? How do we encourage and reward it? How does the nation reconcile explosive growth in health care costs with evidence from leading researchers and experts such as Elliott Fisher, Elizabeth McGlynn, John Wennberg and colleagues, and Francois de Brantes and colleagues that collectively points to serious deficiencies in health care quality and the disconnect between high spending and health care quality?

 

The Hot Spotters - Can We Lower Medical Costs by Giving the Neediest Patients Better Care?

The New Yorker, January 24, 2011

 

Dr. Atul Gawande discusses medical hot spotting in his latest article in the New Yorker. "Hot spotting" - or identifying and targeting patients with complex conditions that are receiving inadequate care and racking up expensive medical bills – is the latest trend in healthcare delivery that focuses on improving quality and derailing runaway costs.

 

The 1099 Provision

RWJF, February 14, 2011

 

Both Democrats and Republicans largely agree on repealing the provision in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that requires businesses file Form 1099 with the Internal Revenue Service for all vendor purchases totaling $600 or more annually. This so-called "1099 provision" was designed to capture tax revenues that may be lost if businesses fail to report income, and was one of the ACA’s revenue-raising provisions.

 

Securing a Healthy Future: The Commonwealth Fund State Scorecard on Child Health System Performance, 2011

The Commonwealth Fund, February 2, 2011

 

The State Scorecard on Child Health System Performance, 2011, examines states’ performance on 20 key indicators of children’s health care access, affordability of care, prevention and treatment, the potential to lead healthy lives & health system equity.

 

RWJF Health Care Public Perception Index

RWJF January, 2011

 

Americans’ confidence in their ability to afford future care and maintain coverage fell in December. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Care Public Perception Index (RWJF Index) decreased from 98.1 points in November to 96.1 points in December.

 

Medical Liability Reform - Cutting Costs, Spurring Investment, Creating Jobs

AMA, January 20, 2011

 

The medical liability system is in desperate need of reform.  It is neither fair nor cost effective in compensating injured patients. It has become an increasingly irrational system driven by time consuming litigation & open-ended non-economic damage awards.

 

Regional Variation in Medicare  Service Use

Medpac, January 2011

 

The utilization of Medicare services varies dramatically in different parts of the country, according to a new report by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. "We find that regional variation is particularly high for post-acute sector services, such as home health," the report states.

 

Preventive Services Without Cost Sharing

Health Affairs, December 28, 2010

 

This brief covers details regarding 2011 rules for new group and individual health plans that must cover 45 different preventive services that are rated highest by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. (A chart in the brief lists the services covered.)

 

Achieving Accountable & Affordable Care

The Center for American Progress, December, 2010

 

Under the reform law, an ACO is a group of physicians & hospitals collaborating to provide efficient & quality care for a certain group of patients. The Center for American Progress report said ACOs should follow 3 major principles.

 

Why the Individual Mandate Matters -Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues

RWJF, December, 2010

 

With conflicting rulings about the constitutionality of the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act, we are left to wonder: what would the ACA look like if its individual mandate were stripped off? A report shows that the number of uninsured would be cut 50% if the mandate is left in place—20% without the mandate.

 

Workplace Clinics: A Sign of Growing Employer Interest in Wellness

HSC, December, 2010

 

Commonplace in the 1980s among the heavy industry/manufacturing and financial sectors, workplace clinics were geared primarily toward treating workplace injuries or minimizing employees’ time away from work.

 

Realizing Health Reform’s Potential: Adults Ages 50–64 and the Affordable Care Act of 2010

The Commonwealth Fund, December 14, 2010

 

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which will provide health insurance to nearly all U.S. citizens and improve the quality of health insurance, will particularly benefit adults ages 50 to 64, a group suffering from extended unemployment and a loss of employer health benefits.

 

Physician Practice EHR Price Tag

CDW Healthcare, December, 2010

 

With Meaningful Use incentives scheduled to start in 2011, physician practices are actively assessing the costs and benefits associated with implementing an Electronic Health Record (EHR) solution.

 

The 2007-09 Recession And Health Insurance Coverage  

Health Affairs, December, 2010

 

This Health Affairs paper examines both the changes in income and coverage over the entire decade, with a closer examination of the economic changes from 2007 to 2009.

 

As Healthcare Reform Takes Hold, 74% of Physicians Will Retire, Work Part-time, Or Seek Other Alternatives

The Physicians Foundation, October, 2010

 

Healthcare reform will usher in a new era of medicine in which physicians will largely cease to operate as full-time, independent, private practitioners accepting third party payments. They will work as employees, as part-timers, as administrators, in cash-only “concierge” practices, or they will walk away from medicine altogether.

 

Study finds large wage differences for specialists, primary care physicians

Healthcare Finance News, October 27, 2010

 

A national study of physician wages conducted by the UC Davis Health System has found that specialists are paid as much as 52% more than primary care doctors, even though primary care doctors see far more patients.

 

Health Insurance Exchanges: How Economic and Financial Modeling Can Support State Implementation

State Health Access Data Assistance Center, November, 2010

 

Functional insurance exchanges will require careful operational and financial planning by states in order to ensure they are efficient and able to compete in the insurance market.

 

Medical Loss Ratios

Health Affairs, November 17, 2010

 

A new Health Policy Brief from Health Affairs and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation examines the requirements outlined in the Affordable Care Act concerning "medical loss ratios" (the percentage of premiums that insurance companies must spend on health care services).

 

The State of EHR Adoption: On The Road to Improving Patient Safety

Healthcare Informatics Research

 

Despite being identified as an essential tool to support quality care initiatives, improve patient safety and reduce healthcare costs, electronic medical and health record (EMR/EHR) systems have been stuck in a slow growth cycle.

 

Insurers, brokers are hindering healthcare cost reductions

Healthcare Finance News, Nov 2, 2010

 

The Healthcare Performance Management Institute says recent research indicates insurers and benefits consultants are hindering employers' efforts to reduce healthcare costs.

 

NCQA seeks feedback on evaluating accountable care organizations

The National Committee for Quality Assurance is seeking input from the public on draft accountable care organization standards. Comments may be submitted until 5 p.m. Nov. 19 on the NCQA's website.

 

Integrating Comparative Effectiveness Research Into Clinical Practice

AHIP, October 2010

 

With the economic stimulus package bankrolling comparative effectiveness research (CER) to the tune of $1.1 billion, the health care industry is preparing to integrate CER. However, many important issues remain under consideration.

 

Operation of a health exchange within the PPACA

Millman Group, October 2010

 

This paper, the latest in a series of papers on exchanges, addresses the functions of an exchange and examines various operational considerations.

 

'Grandfathered' Plans: Keep it in the Family?

RWJF/Health Affairs, Oct 2010

 

A new policy brief from Health Affairs and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation examines what grandfathered plans mean, and explores just how much a grandfathered plan may change over time and still retain its grandfathered status—such as altering the list of preferred providers or changing the prescription drug formulary. The authors conclude that there are no clear indicators about whether sticking with a grandfathered plan is the best option—and therefore these decisions must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

 

 

 

 

In Health Care, Determining What’s Unnecessary

The Washington Post, January 19, 2012

 

It’s an oft-repeated health-care statistic, and one that’s easy to get frustrated about: As much as one-third of health-care costs are wasteful, spent on unnecessary treatments that do not improve Americans’ health.

 

Determining what medical spending is wasteful is the hard part. What procedures should doctors not provide, and insurance companies not pay for? Figuring out which treatments are wasteful is both a policy and politics challenge, one that can often invoke accusations of “rationing” or denied care.

 

Despite all those hurdles, a new campaign called Choosing Wisely aims to answer just that question. Run by the American Board of Internal Medicine, Choosing Wisely has brought nine major medical societies on board to identify five common procedures that are often wasteful and unnecessary. The groups will provide their answers at the end of January and make them public in April.

 

On Wednesday, I spoke with Christine Cassel, president and chief executive of the American Board of Internal Medicine, about the new project, why it’s happening and the big challenges in finding waste in health care. What follows is a transcript of our discussion, lightly edited for length and content.

 

Sarah Kliff: Tell me the back story on this. How did the Choosing Wisely initiative get started?

 

Christine Cassel: The back story started exactly 10 years ago, when we published a charter on physician professionalism. It was a kind of update to the traditional Hippocratic Oath, an ethics statement for the profession in the modern environment that was endorsed by 130 different medical associations. In that document, there were 10 commitments that we agreed were central to the profession, and one was stewardship of medical resources.

 

In the past two years, the financial crisis combined with the discussion of rising health-care costs have revived that discussion, and people are talking about it in every way. The ABIM Foundation decided to focus all its efforts three years ago in resource stewardship, and develop ways to foster more conversation among physicians on these issues. We also began partnering with Consumer Reports, which will be providing a lot of this information. The idea is to get more evidence-based information out to patients.

 

SK: Patients don’t want to undergo unnecessary medical treatment, and doctors probably don’t want to provide it. So why hasn’t this problem resolved itself without intervention?

 

CC: One of the clearest reasons is our fee-for-service payment system, where doctors get paid more for doing more. Very few doctors do things that they know are wasteful, but if there’s a gray zone they could say, why not, it may help and it doesn’t hurt the patient.

 

Patients also haven’t been as informed as they are now. Now, unfortunately there are a lot more of us having to pay out of pocket. It used to be, if you were lucky, you didn’t see the bills. Now, people are asking themselves if certain treatments are necessary.

 

SK: How much of unnecessary care has to do with defensive medicine, doctors looking to avoid a medical malpractice lawsuit?

 

CC: That comes up a lot in our discussions. Physicians hate the threat of malpractice. The data show it’s a very small part of the cost of health care, but in terms of a doctor’s attitude, if you’re in the emergency room and have any doubt, the thought is probably it’s better to order the test. I hope this will help offer doctors some backbone not to.

 

SK: From what I understand, the speciality societies will have to get their recommendations to you by the end of January. How is the work going for them? Is it difficult to settle on which treatments are unnecessary?

 

CC: The good news is we had a conference call last week and they are taking this very seriously. They have set up major committees of experts to review the evidence and come up with things that matter. We’ve said to them, “We don’t want you to have things that are hardly done anyway, things that aren’t going to make difference.” They’re looking for real interventions where new evidence has emerged, where something used to be done routinely but may not need to be.

 

SK: Is there disagreement between doctors over whether a certain treatment is necessary?

 

CC: There are some hard questions and might be disagreements among different experts within a given speciality. In cancer, for example, there may be people who have different experience, and who may question the literature. But that’s what you want scientists. It’s going to force them to all look at the same evidence and come up with their best answer.

 

SK: You all will publish the results of your work in April. These aren’t going to bind physicians’ practice in anyway, so what’s the hope for how they’ll change medicine?

 

CC: The way we’ll communicate this is through Consumer Reports, through their Web site and magazine. We hope that patients will start asking questions and also doctors will want to know more. They’ll come to their societies, see it in their journals. I sense some real enthusiasm, and these groups taking it seriously. They recognize the pressures of professionalism.

 

Another factor that is related to this is the new methods of paying for health care, which pushes doctors to be more efficient with resources. These are things like the Patient-Centered Medical Home and Accountable Care Organizations. If you look at the budget and sequestration, there are federal pressures, too. Consumers have a tighter budget, and so does the whole health-care system.

 

SK: Identifying unnecessary treatments can be politically challenging. I think we saw, during the health reform debate, a lot of accusations about doctors or governments “rationing” or denying health care. How do you handle those kinds of challenges?

 

CC: My hope here is we can get away from that rhetoric, which is really misleading to the public and is, I think, scare tactics. None of this is rationing. Rationing is withholding care that is needed. And we’re not talking about needed care here. We’re talking about prudent uses of resources to get what is best for each patient.

 

New Year, New Concerns: How to Set Medical Practice Goals For 2012

Amednews, December 5, 2011

 

What is your practice going to accomplish next year?

 

Experts say setting goals for the coming year that do not fall by the wayside like many New Year's resolutions is increasingly important to help medical practices stay focused and in business, what with all the changes being wrought by health system reform.

 

"We're in a very dynamic time in health care, but it's not a stable time," said Manuel Lowenhaupt, MD, a partner in Accenture's health provider practice in Boston. "Practices need to recognize that their ability to flex and change and focus is much more important than it has been in the past."

 

And December is not too late to set goals for 2012. "It's never too late," Dr. Lowenhaupt said.

 

People who work with medical practices say the first step in goal setting is to identify aspirations that are large and overarching. Experts advise that any list of goals include ones that are both realistic to achieve within the next year and ones that are more long-term. There is no specific number a practice should have, although too long a list can become unwieldy.

 

"You need to have goals to build a strategy and manage a successful business, but if you have more than 10 goals that you hope to implement, it can become unmanageable," said Jason Hwang, MD, executive director of health care with the Innosight Institute, a think tank in Mountain View, Calif., that focuses on innovation and business.

 

Goals should be in line with the needs and priorities of the practice.

 

"Each individual practice is going to have their own mission or vision as well as their own financial or operational goals, and they should be tied into where you want to bring your business," said David MacDonald, president and CEO of health care consultancy Aegle Advisors in Marion, Mass. "You need to know what the practice's challenges are."

 

For example, is the practice so busy that patients are frustrated with long wait times? Are phone calls from patients not returned in a timely manner, or not at all? Are new physicians or staffers needed to maintain a level of care and keep patients coming back, as appropriate? Are employees disengaged from their jobs? Even if the practice is financially successful, ignoring such issues may jeopardize its future, experts said.

 

"A practice may need better logistical planning," MacDonald said. "In this economy, patients are paying more for health insurance and more for care. They expect more value and to get the service they require on their terms."

 

Various aspects of health system reform, such as the move toward accountable care organizations and quality-based payment, mean that practices may want to ask: Are there any care gaps or issues with quality? Are there connections that can or should be built with other physicians?

 

"There are a lot of things changing right now," Dr. Lowenhaupt said. "The key is to make sure that the patient experience aligns with evolving needs."

 

Or is the practice already struggling financially? Does the practice need to find ways to bring more patients into the door or collect a higher percentage of co-pays and deductibles before the patient leaves the office? Does the practice have a high no-show rate? Can office space be used more efficiently?

 

When the larger goals are identified, the next step is to identify how to get there by breaking things down into smaller, measurable targets. For example, a practice struggling with wait times and patient satisfaction may want to look at improving how patients flow through the office. Where can the process get better? Which staffers should be given specific tasks to achieve this end? If practice financials need improving, are there ways to ensure that patients do not leave the office without at least discussing how to cover their share? How can this goal be broken down so each staffer knows how to achieve the goal?

 

"You need to link everybody in that chain to the success of the goals," MacDonald said.

 

After goals have been devised and broken down, practice management consultants say the next step is to communicate to staffers the overarching goals and what they mean to each employee. This can include information about how employees and the practice may be rewarded if targets are hit.

 

For example, practice goals for next year can be incorporated into performance reviews or various bonuses. Staff rewards for hitting respective targets can be financial but may be nonmonetary, such as additional time off or public recognition.

 

"Every time you achieve something you should be talking about it," MacDonald said. "People will feel valued, and it gives them that positive reinforcement around these common goals."

 

People who work with medical practices caution that any plan take into account that change takes time.

 

"A practice needs to ask: How do we want to move our people in the right direction?" MacDonald said. "None of this stuff happens overnight, but once you lay it out there, you will start to see movement. You can really move an organization forward."

 

Excellent Service to Patients Requires Vision, Planning

Modern Medicine, November 1, 2011

 

Service is especially important now, as physicians face declining reimbursements and increasing competition. Patients evaluate practices based on ease of making appointments, check-in process, timeliness.

 

National report — Superior service doesn't just happen. Experts say it requires having a proactive plan for an element of medical practice that many physicians unfortunately overlook.

 

As physicians, says Victor J. Marks, M.D., "Service is what we do. We don't make or grow anything. We serve other people." He is director, department of dermatology, and section chief of dermatologic surgery at Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pa.

 

He says it's crucial that dermatologists provide service that patients can recognize as exceptional. In a competitive marketplace, "People will come to us based on whether they believe that the service we provide is better than the competition," he says.

 

Although service is always important, says Sandra Ellison, it's especially important now, as physicians face declining reimbursements and increasing competition for their services, particularly in the cash-based aesthetic arena.

 

"When patients have the power to choose which practice they go to, they're more likely to choose a practice that meets not just their medical needs, but their overall needs," she says. Ms. Ellison is president, Ellison Consulting Group, and an adjunct faculty member at the Center for Creative Leadership's Colorado Springs, Colo., campus.

 

Marketing matters

 

Dr. Marks says that when it comes to marketing, "We tend to focus our efforts on our diagnostic, clinical and technical skills. The problem is, patients can't evaluate our clinical abilities very well. Most patients give us the benefit of the doubt." Instead, he says, they base their opinions of a physician mainly on their interactions with the physician and his or her practice.

 

"People remember how you made them feel, especially patients. They often find medical settings uncertain and frightening. The more high-touch and service-oriented you can be, the more you can alleviate their fears and give them a better experience in your practice," Ms. Ellison says.

 

When people visit a doctor, she says, "They are usually entering the situation with some anxiety and trepidation. They have had to take time away from work to be there. They come to your door worried about something, perhaps something that they fear will result in debilitation or death. They worry what it will cost, if it will hurt and when they can get back to normal. These simple fears can be easily overlooked by busy physicians and staff, but they shouldn't be."

 

Patient anxiety is often further increased by annoying things that a practice does, she says. Examples include subjecting patients to excessive wait times before they can see the physician, or staff members asking the same questions repeatedly.

 

"When staff are rude or gruff in the way they approach patients, anxiety increases further," Ms. Ellison says. "A highly anxious patient often doesn't hear what you said, and as a consequence, is less likely to follow the instructions you've given them. This obviously affects outcomes."

 

Dr. Marks says that when it comes to practice systems and processes, "Patients evaluate us on the ease of making appointments, the check-in process, the flow in our offices, the ease of checkout and the timeliness and accuracy of billing." Patients also evaluate the practice environment — how it looks, smells and feels and whether staff members conduct themselves with professionalism, he says.

 

In other words, he says, "Is there excessive levity, or is the decorum in the hallways as we would want our patients to perceive it? Are our waiting rooms neat and tidy," with appropriate music, magazines and other accoutrements? In the latter area, Ms. Ellison says that amenities ranging from aesthetic features such as waterfalls to warm cookies can surprise and delight patients, thereby differentiating one's practice from the competition.

 

Communication pitfalls

 

Patients also judge the way a practice communicates, both verbally and nonverbally, Dr. Marks says. "Are patients addressed appropriately? Are there smiles on our faces? Probably the most important component of communication is the behaviors we exhibit. We tend to rely on the behaviors that come naturally to us and our employees," though some of these behaviors might not be pleasing to patients.

 

Fortunately, he says, desirable behaviors can be discussed, scripted and practiced until they become natural. Examples include answering the phone in a cheerful, upbeat manner, or having nurses introduce themselves to patients a standard fashion, Dr. Marks says.

 

Physicians also must model the behaviors they expect of their employees. Conversely, "If you roll your eyes at a difficult or demanding patient, your employees will do the same," he says.

 

Personality first

 

In hiring staff, Dr. Marks says, "Hire for personality over experience." Experience comes with time and training, he says, but personality is very difficult to change if it does not fit the practice you're trying to create.

 

"If you want a bubbly, happy office, hire people like that. Also consider who you like being around. If you want someone who's vivacious and effervescent and that fits your personality type, that's great.

 

"Sometimes physicians don't sit down and create a vision or picture in their mind's eye of what they're trying to create," he says. "They just go into practice, start seeing patients and react to that inundation of patients," rather than first determining what they want their patients' experience at their offices to be.

 

Envisioning success

 

For physicians, Ms. Ellison says, "It's important to have a clear, compelling vision for your office, clinic or department. And 'I want to make a lot of money' is not something your staff can rally around." She says a more fruitful vision might involve becoming the most sought-after source of dermatology services in your market or offering the most cutting-edge therapies and compassionate care.

 

"The path to service excellence is not something you do overnight," she adds. "It's grounded in your values, beliefs and vision. And it's not enough for you as the practice owner or department chairman to say, 'Here's what we're going to do.' You must gain buy-in from your employees."

 

Typically, she says, this process includes a series of meetings that get people aligned around a common vision. At each step, "Find ways to include as many people as you can. Even consider places where you need to hear the voice of your patients in the process. Gather data about four key areas: processes, environment, culture and amenities. Within these areas, look for the things in your practice that really annoy people," Ms. Ellison says.

 

In one practice she has worked with, Ms. Ellison says, patients felt their sense of confidentiality betrayed by a paper sign-in sheet that left their names exposed for other patients to read. Now the practice uses a label sheet that allows staff members to peel off each patient's name as soon as he or she signs in.

 

"Most patients will not tell these things to a doctor's face — they'll leave your practice, but they won't tell you why," she says. "Form a team to work on building service excellence. One thing the team must decide is how to get the voice of the customer."

 

Providers Cheer ACO Final Rule: Reactions to The Revised Cut

Fierce Healthcare, October 21, 2011

 

After delivering severe criticisms when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed rules in the spring, professional medical groups--for the most part--now are applauding the final rule, an easier-to-swallow version of the accountable care organization (ACO) program.

 

With the notably relaxed changes, the final rule is being hailed by some healthcare organizations.

 

American Hospital Association:

"Today's rules represent the direction in which the hospital field is moving--toward better coordinated patient care across care settings," AHA President and CEO Rich Umbdenstock said in a statement yesterday. "We commend CMS for listening to the concerns of America's hospitals. The hospital field is actively working on ways to improve care delivery and the final accountable care organization rule provides hospitals a better path to do so."

 

American Medical Association:

"We are pleased that the final rule ... includes many of the important changes recommended by the AMA to allow all interested physicians to lead and participate in these new models of care," said Dr. Peter W. Carmel, the Association's president, in an American Medical News article. "The AMA has stressed throughout this rule-making process that, if well-implemented, the ACO model offers promise to improve care coordination and quality while reducing costs. This final rule requires a full, in-depth review to ensure it maximizes those potential benefits for Medicare patients and physicians."

 

Association of American Medical Colleges:

"The AAMC is pleased that the ACO final rule excludes indirect medical education payments from the methodology used to assess shared savings under the program. By not including these policy payments in the historical cost analysis, medical schools and teaching hospitals--institutions that often treat the sickest and most vulnerable patients--have a better opportunity to participate in the ACO initiative," President and CEO Dr. Darrell G. Kirch said in a statement yesterday.

 

AARP:

"The programs announced today can benefit people in Medicare by encouraging providers to work together to better coordinate patient care, which can lead to fewer hospital readmissions and lower Medicare costs. AARP believes today's announcement is a good first step and we welcome the chance to further review these programs," AARP Legislative Policy Director David Certner said in a statement yesterday.

 

Campaign for Better Care:

"We are very pleased that this final rule will require ACOs to adhere to strong patient-centered criteria, use beneficiary experience of care measures to evaluate performance, and ensure full transparency, notification and choice for beneficiaries," Campaign for Better Care Leader Debra L. Ness said in a statement yesterday. "This new rule is not perfect, but it provides a path away from the broken, dysfunctional health care system we have today toward a system that offers higher quality, better coordinated and more patient-centered care." She added, "In the end, we see this rule as a reasonable compromise. The Department was enormously responsive to the comments that were filed and in particular, to concerns raised by providers."

 

Decoding the God Complex

New York Times, September 27, 2011

 

Medical schools are starting to train doctors to be less intimidating to patients. And patients are starting to train themselves to be less intimidated by doctors.

 

We haven’t completely gotten away from the syndrome so perfectly described by Alec Baldwin’s arrogant surgeon in the movie “Malice”: “When someone goes into that chapel and they fall on their knees and they pray to God that their wife doesn’t miscarry or that their daughter doesn’t bleed to death or that their mother doesn’t suffer acute neural trauma from postoperative shock, who do you think they’re praying to? ... You ask me if I have a God complex. Let me tell you something: I am God.”

 

But there have been baby steps away from the Omniscient Doctor. The federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has begun a new campaign to encourage patients to ask more pertinent questions and to prod doctors to elicit more relevant answers.

 

“I used to think, ‘He’s a doctor. Who am I to ask a question?’ ” Bill Lee, a Baltimore man who has suffered 10 heart attacks, says in a video on the agency’s Web site urging people to speak up.

 

Patients have more options, a flood of Internet information and a bombardment of drug ads listing side effects — and that can be terrifying. It adds to the general anxiety level that health insurance costs are rising sharply and that President Obama’s health care law seems headed toward the Supreme Court.

 

The “experts” are always issuing guidelines, which are soon contradicted by another set of “experts.” It happened with the recommended age for regular mammograms, and it’s happening with guidelines on hormone replacement for postmenopausal women.

 

First, estrogen was going to be the fountain of youth. Then hormone replacement therapy was going to spell doom, causing heart disease, stroke and breast cancer. And now, as The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday, “some experts are reaching a more nuanced view of the risks and benefits and concluding that hormone therapy may still be a good option for healthy women in their 50s, depending on their symptoms, family history and worst fears.”

 

Each patient, a Michigan gynecologist told The Journal, is like a Rubik’s Cube, and must get an individual solution.

 

That is also the message of a new book, “Your Medical Mind: How to Decide What Is Right for You,” by Jerome Groopman, an oncologist, and his wife, Pamela Hartzband, an endocrinologist, both members of the Harvard faculty and staff physicians at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.

 

Few people have done as much to demystify medicine as Dr. Groopman, who has written four other books and lots of New Yorker essays aiming to help doctors understand that patients are often neglected allies with good intuition, and to help patients get confidence and control by understanding how doctors think.

 

Like a Middle East peace broker, he aims to lower the stress level and bring together two sides who perpetually misunderstand each other.

 

With his white beard, 6-foot-5 stature and friendly manner, the Queens native certainly looks trustworthy. Stephen Colbert once accused Groopman of “trying to look like God.”

 

And I can say from personal experience — since I’ve known him, he’s provided guidance that helped save the lives of three members of my family — that he is a fierce, sensitive and generous patient advocate. (And an aficionado of Irish literature.)

 

Dr. Hartzband and Dr. Groopman warn against excessive reliance on overreaching so-called experts and nebulous metrics and statistics.

 

“The answer often lies not with the experts but within you,” they write, adding that the Albert Einstein line is apt: “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.”

 

The authors stress that “the best” and “informed” can be subjective terms, and that your prognosis can often look very different if you “flip the frame” of reference.

 

They try to decode the Orwellian language that prevents physicians and patients from cooperating, and show how doctors can project their own preferences on patients.

 

They interview patients who are Doubters and Minimalists, who may agree with Voltaire’s view that “the art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease.” And they interview Believers and Maximalists, who go for radical treatments too quickly. They confess that they have a mixed marriage: Dr. Hartzband tends to be a Doubter (her mom’s mantra was “Doctors don’t know everything”) while Dr. Groopman tends to be a Believer (a status that got shaken when he jumped into a spinal fusion operation that had “disastrous consequences.”)

 

“The unsettling reality,” they write, “is that much of medicine still exists in a gray zone, where there is no black or white answer about when to treat or how to treat.”

 

But they are both optimists who warn against the “focusing illusion” — focusing on what will be lost after a colostomy, mastectomy, prostate surgery or other major procedures.

 

“The focusing illusion,” they write, “neglects our extraordinary capacity to adapt, to enjoy life with less than ‘perfect’ health.”

 

An Insurance Maze for U.S. Doctors

The New York Times, August 25, 2011

 

A former colleague from Canada who practiced medicine with me here in the States never hesitated to make one thing clear to me: He couldn’t wait to get back.

 

It wasn’t the cultural life that he missed, nor was it the ex-girlfriend I always suspected he pined for. It was the medicine.

 

“It’s different,” he would say wistfully, without elaborating. “Practicing medicine is just different over there.”

 

A study published this month in the journal Health Affairs made me think of my colleague again and offered one likely possibility for his return to Canada: There, he had more time to focus on his patients.

 

Researchers asked hundreds of physicians and administrators in private practices across the United States and Canada how much time they spent each day with insurers and other third-party payers, tracking down information for claims that were denied or incorrectly paid, resolving questions about insurance coverage for prescription drugs or diagnostic tests, and filing the different forms required by each and every insurance company.

 

Physicians in Canada, where health care is administered mainly by the government, did spend a good deal of time and money communicating with their payers. But American doctors in the study spent far more dealing with multiple health plans: more than $80,000 per year per physician, or roughly four times as much as their northern counterparts. And their offices spent as many as 21 hours per week with payers, nearly 10 times as much as the Canadian offices.

 

“The amount of time we spend on this is just crazy,” said Dr. Sara L. Star, a partner in a three-physician pediatrics practice in suburban Chicago. “But each insurance company has its own language, its own set of rules and specific contracts with certain laboratories, hospitals, physicians and pharmaceutical companies.”

 

And when those companies offer multiple “insurance products,” the convoluted coverage grid acquires yet another level of complexity. Each “product” comes with its own unique permutation and combination of authorization requirements, rules for claims and list of approved prescription drugs.

 

Large practices often choose to outsource the job to firms that specialize in wading through the labyrinthine rules and regulations. Some hire several nurses or administrators to work exclusively with insurers, with each specializing in the arcane rules of a single insurer. But most primary care providers in this country — clinicians who are part of practices with five or fewer physicians — cannot afford to pay for additional help. Instead, they must make their way through the thicket of insurers and rules by themselves.

 

The complicated task inevitably gets in the way of patient care.

 

A young patient complaining of extreme fatigue, for example, might benefit from a $40 blood test that could confirm infectious mononucleosis in 10 minutes. But a doctor cannot order the simple test without first checking with the insurance company to see if it is covered and if there are any constraints on where the patient’s blood can be drawn and the test run.

 

Tracking down answers often means phone calls with long periods on hold, digging up old patient information and even recruiting office workers to act as specimen couriers to other labs and hospitals in order to expedite results or save frail patients or harried family members the hassle of traveling to an “approved site” for a test or procedure. “If someone comes in with a sick infant who needs a test, we often eat the costs and draw the blood ourselves,” Dr. Star said. “We aren’t going to tell them to put that kid in a car seat, drive a mile to an approved lab, park, register, then wait in line.”

 

Even more confusing are frequent changes in health care plans, particularly regarding prescription drugs. Every week, payers send physicians’ offices notifications of changes in their list of approved medications, lists that run to hundreds of different drugs. The sheer volume of new information makes it impossible for doctors to keep up. “Physicians get into medical school because we can follow rules,” said Dr. Marian Bouchard, a family doctor who practices with two other physicians and a nurse practitioner in Bristol, Vt. “But none of us can or want to follow the minutiae of a hundred rules at once, especially when we are trying to be present for our patients.”

 

The authors of the study offer several recommendations to reduce the confusion and inefficiency of interactions between physician practices and payers. Not surprisingly, they propose simplifying the forms and procedures that add to costs without improving quality. “There are rules that really save money or improve patient care that health plans won’t want to change,” said Sean Nicholson, one of the study authors and an economist in the department of policy analysis and management at Cornell University. “But there are also a lot of things that don’t matter that they could and should standardize.”

 

The insurance industry, for example, could embrace a single set of universal standards to measure quality rather than the dozens that are currently used. They could adopt a uniform process of obtaining authorization for tests, procedures or consultations. And while widespread adoption of electronic medical records and changes in how doctors are reimbursed may eventually decrease some administrative burdens, the results of the study leave little doubt as to the costs now and in the foreseeable future for doctors and patients.

 

“We aren’t saying that we should go to a single-payer system,” Dr. Nicholson added. “But it’s important to know exactly what all the benefits of the current costs are.”

 

Revealing Their Medical Errors: Why Three Doctors Went Public

Amednews, August 15, 2011

 

To err is human. To tell the world about the cases when things went wrong requires courage.

 

In September 2010, Kimberly Hiatt made a medical error. The critical care nurse at Seattle Children's Hospital miscalculated and gave a fragile 8-month-old baby 1.4 grams of calcium chloride, 10 times the correct dose of 140 milligrams.

 

The mistake contributed to the death of the child and led to Hiatt's firing and an investigation by the state's nursing commission. In April 2011, devastated by the loss of her job and an infant patient, Hiatt committed suicide.

 

Hiatt, who had worked as a nurse for more than two decades, was another in a long line of "second victims" of medical error, the term used in medical literature to describe physicians and other health professionals who often feel guilty and depressed after adverse events. Many physicians and other health professionals hold themselves to a standard of perfection, and when things go wrong, they feel alone.

 

Physician health experts estimate that 250 doctors commit suicide annually -- a rate about double that of the general population. When doctors believe they have made a major medical error, they are three times likelier than other physicians to contemplate suicide, said a January Archives of Surgery study.

 

If the first instinct after an adverse event is to retreat from scrutiny into a spiral of shame and fear, sharing the ordeal publicly is probably the last thing to cross a physician's mind. But a small group of doctors has done just that. Here are three physicians who shared their stories with the world in an effort to tell their colleagues and their patients that to err is human.

"Biggest mistake"

 

It was not until he was dictating a report on the last of his six operations that hectic day that orthopedic surgeon David C. Ring, MD, PhD, realized his mistake. He had performed the wrong surgery on a patient.

 

A 65-year-old Spanish-speaking woman was scheduled for a trigger-finger release procedure, but Dr. Ring mistakenly performed a carpal-tunnel release. A change in the operating room's location meant a nurse who sat in on a preoperative assessment was not present to catch Dr. Ring's error. Another nurse mistook Dr. Ring's conversation in Spanish with the patient for a preoperative timeout. The marking on the site for the correct procedure -- the trigger-finger release -- vanished once the skin was cleaned in preparation for surgery.

An estimated 250 doctors commit suicide each year, double the rate of the general U.S. population.

 

Dr. Ring was distracted. Earlier in the day, he performed a carpal-tunnel release for another patient, who was upset about the injection of anesthetic for the procedure because it caused her a great deal of pain. Shortly before the wrong surgery, he visited this other, highly agitated patient in the recovery area and struggled to calm her down.

 

"I felt bad for her," says Dr. Ring, associate professor of orthopedic surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. "She was really stressed out from that painful shot. I was resolved in my mind that my next surgery would be my best carpal-tunnel release ever. And it probably was -- it was just on someone who was supposed to have a trigger release."

 

Dr. Ring alerted the patient to the error and offered to immediately perform the correct procedure, which he did. The unnecessary wound to the hand from the wrong procedure would take about a month to heal and be sensitive to the touch for several months, Dr. Ring says.

 

"It could have been a lot, lot, lot worse," he says. The patient got follow-up care from another physician, and the family received a prompt, undisclosed financial settlement from the hospital's insurer.

 

Dr. Ring could have let the matter quietly end there. Instead, he went public.

 

Shortly after the surgery, Dr. Ring and experts on wrong-site surgery held a conference at the hospital to analyze what went wrong and how preoperative protocols could have prevented the error. A transcript of the case conference was published Nov. 11, 2010, in The New England Journal of Medicine, and Dr. Ring's story was highlighted by ABC News.

 

"I knew that the biggest mistake of my life and the worst event in my life was also an opportunity," Dr. Ring says. "In my role as a teacher and mentor, if I make a mistake in diagnosis, a mistake in surgery or a mistake in judgment, it's always been a teaching opportunity. There's always been something to discuss. It's not something to sweep under the rug."

 

Despite the risk to his reputation of going public with his mistake, Dr. Ring believes it was worth it to spread the idea that safety checks are needed to help prevent mistakes and that even the most accomplished physicians can err.

 

"I knew that if I was willing to have that difficult discussion, it would help other people," he says. "It was the right thing to do."

"The outliers we all dread"

 

Bryan E. Bledsoe, DO, was working in a small community emergency department when "this countrified, slow-talking lady" walked in.

Photo

Dr. Bledsoe

 

"She said she had a subarachnoid hemorrhage," says Dr. Bledsoe, now a professor of emergency medicine at the University of Nevada School of Medicine. "I thought, 'How could she know such a thing?' "

 

Dr. Bledsoe discounted what the woman said, making assumptions about her intelligence and social class. She was wearing a soft neck collar, but had it on upside down and backward. The woman complained of neck pain, but not of headache, vomiting or other symptoms more typical of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

 

Today, Dr. Bledsoe says, he would not think twice about ordering a computed tomography scan, but then such imaging was costlier and less common. Dr. Bledsoe, then only a few years out of residency, took x-rays of the woman's neck. With the test results negative, he decided to send her home with some muscle relaxants.

 

The next morning, an ambulance brought in a female patient who required cardiopulmonary resuscitation but could not be revived. It was the same woman who had come the day before. Dr. Bledsoe walked into the room where the woman's children were gathered with their recently deceased mother.

 

"They were standing around holding her hand -- she was dead on the table," Dr. Bledsoe says. "I said, 'I'm sorry. I must have missed something.' The daughter said, 'That's OK. Mama said you were a good doctor. She liked you.' That just made it worse. ... They saw tears in my eyes in that trauma room."

 

Though no autopsy was performed, Dr. Bledsoe believes he missed the diagnosis. "From a prima facie standpoint, she was alive yesterday and now she's dead," he says. "That's not generally considered a good outcome. ... Whether I'm right or wrong doesn't matter, it's how I feel that does. That lady's dead, and I can't bring her back.

 

"I was just rushed," he adds. "I assumed it wasn't something too bad, and I was wrong. These are the outliers we all dread. Of every 100 patients, there's going to be one who hasn't read the book on how to present for a particular disease process. I learned that the hard way."

 

Wracked with guilt, Dr. Bledsoe had trouble getting the case off his mind. He attended the woman's "big Pentecostal funeral." The family wasn't upset with him. "They embraced me," he says.

 

He has kept the case in mind as a warning to avoid jumping to conclusions when diagnosing patients, and has used it as an example when teaching emergency medicine residents. When contacted by a reporter, he chose to go public with the story in a September 2010 article in Reader's Digest.

 

"I figured, 'What's the harm in talking about it if it helps somebody else?' " Dr. Bledsoe says. "I'm not proud of it, but any doctor who says they haven't made a mistake is a liar. Physicians are human. For anyone to expect absolute perfection in everything is a fool's errand."

Tearing down "wall of silence"

 

Jo Shapiro, MD, specializes in surgically repairing Zenker's diverticulum, an outpouching of the throat. The surgery involves cutting through the lining of the pouch but stopping just before getting to the outer lining. The procedure is done using a microscope that exposes a small part of the anatomy to the surgeon.

Photo

Dr. Shapiro

 

"It's a matter of millimeters," says Dr. Shapiro, chief of the division of otolaryngology at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.

 

A known complication of this procedure is that, about 1% of the time, the surgeon will pierce the lining of the throat. Despite her best effort, that is what Dr. Shapiro did to a patient in the late 1990s. Though warned of the potential surgical complication, the patient and his family perceived the adverse event as a medical error. The man survived but developed a chest and neck infection and later sued unsuccessfully. It is emotionally trying anytime the patient's outcome is poor, Dr. Shapiro says.

 

"Intellectually, you say that something might go wrong with the care you're giving. But when it actually does, at that moment you realize you've made the person worse rather than better," she says. "You feel terrible for the patient, and you feel like you've let them down. You feel that you should have done better. Somehow you call into question all of your competence."

 

Dr. Shapiro spoke about her experience for the first time publicly before 3,000 physicians, nurses and health care administrators at a patient safety conference in 2006. At the time, she says, pressure on physicians to disclose adverse events was mounting, but health care organizations were doing little to help them deal with the emotional hurdles that make disclosure a difficult thing for doctors.

 

"We have to understand that, despite our best efforts, things will not always go well," Dr. Shapiro says. "The public needs to understand that, and health care providers need to really integrate that into their way of thinking. ... I'm just one of many people to say, 'We're going to tear down the wall of silence, and let's just talk about it.' "

 

Before the big speech, Dr. Shapiro was uncertain about her colleagues' reaction, but afterward received "an amazing amount of warm and wonderful" responses from other health professionals. Additional doctors interviewed for this article also reported receiving many supportive comments from colleagues, and even letters from patients who said they wished they had such caring and compassionate physicians.

 

Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD, also publicly has told the story of a mistake he made early in his career that could have resulted in permanent brain damage to a patient but luckily did not.

 

Going public about the times when things go wrong "shows that just because you have an MD after your name doesn't mean you can't make a mistake," says Dr. Pronovost, a noted patient safety researcher who directs the Division of Adult Critical Care Medicine at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore.

 

"If it's OK that I make a mistake because I'm human, that also means there is an approach to make this better that doesn't just require my personal vigilance. There's a system and a science of safety here that can help."

 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Supporting physicians when things go wrong

 

Few physicians talk publicly about their medical errors, but a growing number are benefiting from programs dedicated to helping doctors deal with the emotional turmoil that often comes in the wake of adverse events.

 

Jo Shapiro, MD, helped start the Center for Professionalism & Peer Support at Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital in October 2008. There are 55 physicians and other health professionals at the hospital trained to offer emotional support to peers involved in cases of patient harm.

 

"When there's any kind of adverse event that we hear about, one of us will make an outreach call to the physician involved," Dr. Shapiro says. "We ask them simple questions like, 'How are you doing? How are you feeling? Is there anything I can do to help you?' "

 

A call from another doctor means a lot, she says. "They say, 'The fact that people care about this just made me feel so much better,' " Dr. Shapiro says. The encounter gives doctors a chance to talk in confidence with a peer about the guilt, fear and shame that often accompany adverse events.

 

"We point out how unrealistic it is that we're trained to think that we should never make a mistake," she says. "We also validate what they are feeling. We tell them that the suffering they're feeling means that they care. We wouldn't want people not to care. It is very hard when someone comes to harm."

 

Other health care organizations such as Children's Hospital Boston, Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, the University of Illinois Medical Center in Chicago and the University of Missouri Health System have peer support programs, says Linda K. Kenney, president and executive director of Medically Induced Trauma Support Services in Chestnut Hill, Mass.

 

Kenney, who was nearly killed by a medical error in November 1999, now advises hospitals on how to disclose adverse events and support the patients, families, physicians and other health professionals involved. Nearly 400 people have requested her organization's tool kit on setting up peer support systems.

 

"I feel like we've reached the tipping point," Kenney says. "Several years ago, people in health care were patting me on the head saying, 'You're doing a good thing, but we're really OK.' Now, they're saying, 'We really need to do something. We're now acknowledging that things go wrong in health care.' "

 

Dr. Shapiro also sees momentum. She has spoken to 10 groups about peer support programs. "The interest level is off the charts. This resonates so well with the idea that we've got to do something to help each other."

 

ANALYSIS: Imagine Primary Care Without The Need For Costly Health Insurance

Iwatch, August 4, 2011

 

Seattle's Qliance eliminated the middleman, and everyone seems happier

 

For health insurance executives, there is no scarier word than "disintermediation." It’s a fancy word that means eliminating the middleman, and those executives know that to many folks, they are the middlemen who all too often stand between patients and their doctors.

 

Now a small but growing number of doctors are figuring out that they and their patients can do quite well without the middleman. If this nascent trend catches on, insurance executives might soon discover that they have been disintermediated, at least as far as the delivery of primary care is concerned.

 

No other country in the developed world allows insurance companies to control its health care system like the United States does, and the fact that we do is one big reason why America spends so much more on health care than anyone else on the planet.

 

In a 2007 McKinsey & Co. report titled “Accounting for the Cost of Health Care in the United States,” the authors, who had studied numerous health care systems abroad, noted that 30 percent of U.S. health care costs are spent on administrative functions unknown in other countries.

 

Not only do U.S. insurance companies themselves devote up to a fifth or more of the premiums they collect from us on overhead, they also make it necessary for providers and employers to maintain large staffs doing nothing more than dealing with insurance companies all day.

 

Citing a 1999 study, McKinsey said the United States could spend $209 billion less every year by eliminating administrative expenses that add little if anything to quality of care. And that was in 1999 dollars. The savings would be much greater today.

 

Among the Americans most fed up with insurance industry bureaucracies are an endangered species of medical professionals: primary care physicians. Believing that there is no real reason why health insurers should be involved in their work at all, several have started a movement to liberate themselves.

 

One of the leaders of the movement is Garrison Bliss, a Seattle doctor who is one of the founders of an alliance of docs called the Direct Primary Care Coalition .

 

Direct primary care practices charge their patients a set amount each month, often as low as $49 for an individual. Because their patient populations are smaller than conventional practices, they are able to spend considerably more time with each patient. While most primary care doctors spend on average no more than 10 minutes with each patient, doctors in direct care practices say they spend 30 minutes to an hour with each patient.

 

Bliss’s practice, Qliance, charges patients between $49 and $89 per month based on age, regardless of health status. Qliance is able to offer those rates — even though it schedules appointments seven days a week — primarily because it has eliminated the costs and time associated with insurance billing. Qliance patients can also be in contact with Bliss and his colleagues by phone or email, which reduces the need for many office visits. There is no restriction on utilization of services.

 

Bliss told me he started Qliance because, “I had a fear that primary care itself was not going to make it.

 

“There were a lot of economic issues and practical issues and reimbursement issues that had crept into primary care,” he said. “Reimbursements (from insurers) were going down and costs were going up. As a result, primary care practices had gotten into the habit of seeing more and more patients, doing more and more lab work and x-rays and procedures, anything that would get reimbursed in our system.”

 

Primary care doctors, he said, found themselves on an exasperating professional treadmill. Many doctors began retiring early and fewer medical students were even considering primary care as an option.

 

Bliss noted that about half of every graduating class of medical students once went into primary care. Now, he says, it’s about 10 percent, and even less at some schools.

 

“When primary care is weaker all kinds of disasters happen,” Bliss said. “There are more visits to the ER, people delay getting the care they need, many others end up seeing specialists and being admitted to the hospital unnecessarily.”

 

Bliss says that about 90 percent of health care services provided today are referred to as primary care or preventive care. And he contends that those services can be delivered more cost effectively if insurers are removed from the equation.  

 

Bliss does not advocate the abolition of insurance companies or suggest that people who are currently insured give up their coverage. He does, however, think insurance coverage is more suitable to protecting people from catastrophic illness.

 

“Insurance as a business model is extremely efficient at taking care of a limited number of very serious health-related problems” he said. “Insurance companies know how to spread the risk for such care.” It was when they got into providing coverage for primary care that the situation — and the costs — got out of control.

 

Bliss says patient satisfaction has gone up and utilization of many medical services has gone down since he switched to the direct primary care model. Compared to more traditional practices in the Seattle area, he said, Qliance patients made 65 percent fewer visits to the ER, were hospitalized 43 percent fewer days and had 66 percent fewer appointments with specialists last year.

 

Lawmakers are beginning to take notice of the emergence of direct primary care practices and are passing laws at both the state and federal level to encourage their growth.

 

In fact, a provision of the federal health care reform law should give such practices a big boost in 2014. When the state health care exchanges are up and running that year, direct primary care practices can be listed as a qualified option and can be eligible for federal subsidies for their patients so long as they have a “wrap-around” relationship with an insurer to provide coverage for catastrophic care.

 

Bliss is confident that by getting insurers out of the primary care business, health care costs will start to come down and patient satisfaction and outcomes will go up.

 

News analyst  Wendell Potter , a former insurance company executive, is the author of  Deadly Spin: An Insurance Company Insider Speaks Out on How Corporate PR Is Killing Health Care and Deceiving Americans.

 

A Worker With No ID and Great Medical Need

New York Times, August 1, 2011

 

In San Francisco, where bicycle commuters often wear full-body spandex suits, my patient Carlos could easily be spotted: the Mexican man in mustard-colored work boots and painter’s overalls stained with gear grease, furiously pedaling an adolescent’s red Huffy.

 

He was the only patient I’ve ever had who rode a bike to his medical appointments, making his way from the docks under the Bay Bridge to our roving clinic about three miles across town. Our clinic for uninsured patients like Carlos was actually a converted cargo van that drove the back alleys of the city, stopping behind big-box stores and beneath bridges to repair cuts and scrapes among the city’s homeless population.

 

We saw Carlos arrive in the van’s rear-view mirror. He would pant while locking his bike to the bumper, then wipe sweat off his upper lip and compose himself, extending a firm handshake to our nurse. I saw him so often with his helmet on that it was not until our third visit that I realized he was nearly bald.

 

What I had noticed, though, was a growth the size of a golf ball emerging above his left clavicle that had begun to press on his airway, causing him to wheeze. “I come here as fast as I can,” he would say every time, apologizing for how long it took to ascend San Francisco’s hills.

 

Carlos propped himself up on the exam table in the back of the van as our nurse rushed back and forth between the steering wheel and the filing cabinets of medical paperwork chained to the walls. In a normal doctor’s office, each of Carlos’s visits would have been carefully documented in a folder labeled with his last name in block letters, slipped into a wall of manila patient records.

 

But here, we stapled the sheets together and slid them into an envelope at the back of a cabinet labeled “Undocumented.”

 

Unlike most of our other patients, Carlos didn’t have any identification. He gladly paid out of pocket for ointments and creams for incidental cuts and bruises. But what he really needed was a biopsy, a $200 procedure that, given the location of the mass in his neck, could not be done safely in the back of a van.

 

We could find no medical office willing to schedule an appointment for a man without identification. One private hospital sent us a typed note: “This unfortunate gentleman will not be eligible for services here.”

 

We told Carlos to go to the emergency room of the public hospital, San Francisco General. He was not yet sick enough to be formally admitted, though, so he sat on a gurney for six hours and was charged $1,085 for a bag of intravenous salt water he didn’t really need. He was passed a note instructing him to “follow up with your primary care provider.”

 

The hospital eventually gave him an appointment for a biopsy; it was scheduled in five months and three weeks. Carlos kept the yellow appointment slip in the front pocket of his overalls. He would bike with it; his sweat stained the paper until the edges wore thin.

 

“I will not miss this,” he said whenever we reminded him of the date. As a temporizing show of support before his biopsy, we would see him every Tuesday at 5:30 p.m. He would roll in, wheezing, but would smile after a brief breathing treatment or 15 minutes with a heating pad on his shoulder.

 

During those early weeks of September, the health care debates raged on television. We watched as President Obama told Congress that illegal immigrants would not get health care coverage. We heard someone yell, “You lie!”

 

On any given day, the bodies of illegal immigrants lie in San Francisco’s coroner’s office, found by police or firefighters in alleys or on sidewalks, unclaimed and unnamed.

 

Before they died, their medical costs may well have been passed on to taxpayers. But it’s also true that many were taxpayers themselves. From 2000 to 2005, illegal immigrant workers paid an estimated $6 billion to $7 billion in Social Security taxes and about $1.5 billion to Medicare, according to the Social Security Administration. And the president’s Council of Economic Advisers has estimated that illegal immigrants pay $80,000 more in taxes per person than they consume in government benefits over their lifetimes.

 

The question of whether to insure Carlos and others like him is really a decision about whether to pay now or later — that is, to pay for preventive medical care now, or to pay in the future for hospital and emergency services, or for the internment of unclaimed bodies.

 

Carlos stopped coming to his appointments. Our driver would wait an extra 30 minutes for him to reappear, brushing off demands from traffic cops to make way for the evening restaurant crowd. Weeks passed. Carlos’s friends from the docks approached the van, wondering if we had seen him.

 

Early one morning, a clerk at the public hospital handed me a message. Carlos’s red bike had turned up at a police auction. Sold, for $32.

 

I fear the growth in his throat may have been cancer, that it may have killed him. The coroner’s office cannot tell us, but it would not be that surprising, really. At the age of 50, Carlos already had surpassed by an entire year the average life expectancy of a migrant laborer in the United States.

 

Dr. Sanjay Basu is a resident in internal medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. This essay was written as part of the university’s Partnership for Physician Advocacy Skills program.

 

Dr. Sanjay Basu is a resident in internal medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. This essay was written as part of the university’s Partnership for Physician Advocacy Skills program.

 

Staying in Private Practice Offers its Own Rewards

Amednews, July 18, 2011

 

The number of small, privately owned practices continues to shrink as economic pressures and long hours take their toll on the owner-physician.

 

Sixty-five percent of established physicians and 49% of physicians hired out of residency or fellowship in a recent 12-month period were placed in hospital-owned practices, according to a Medical Group Management Assn. physician placement report issued in June 2010.

 

But private practice doesn't need to go the way of the dinosaur, experts say. There are many reasons -- both financial and personal -- why physicians should not sell their practices.

 

One reason is having more autonomy. If you have your own practice, you are the boss and you run your own ship, said family physician Sanford J. Brown, MD, who has had a solo practice in Fort Bragg, Calif., for more than 30 years.

 

You set your own work hours, implement your own philosophy of care, spend as much time as you want with a patient and are not strangled by policy like you could be when working for some larger medical groups, said Nina Grant, vice president, managing agency director, with Practice Builders, an Irvine, Calif.-based marketing agency for private physician practices.

 

"You can design your own office the way you want it," said family physician Roland A. Goertz, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians. "If you can't be happy in that environment, I'm not sure what environment you could be happy in."

 

Maintaining a strong sense of personality is another reason to keep your practice.

 

"This is what people went into medicine for. Plus, doctors tend to be Renaissance people -- they can do a lot very well," said Dr. Goertz, whose practice is in Waco, Texas. He said many doctors are fascinated by the business side of the practice as well as the medicine aspect and have the ability and skills to succeed in both.

 

In addition, a practice can match a physician's values. Dr. Goertz lives in a church-aligned area where some doctors instill their spiritualism in their practices. "These physicians will more easily attract patients with similar beliefs. Patients feel very comfortable with them," he said.

 

You can create a legacy. When a doctor builds a practice, he or she develops trust between themselves and patients that continues to grow and becomes bigger than just the doctor, Grant said. It also includes paraprofessionals and other staff in the practice.

 

Other reasons why a physician should not sell his or her practice:

 

   * You despise politics: Grant said large conglomerate-owned or hospital-owned practices are big businesses that often have the same hierarchies and politics that can be found in the business world.

   * You have a loyal staff: You're paying your staff's salary so they're loyal to you when you have your own office, Dr. Brown said. Irene Doti, a spokeswoman for Practice Builders, said doctors like to keep their own staffs and some doctors have a difficult time relating to hospital staffs. Plus, Doti said some physicians hire family members, including spouses, to help run their private practices. "The reality is, if the doctor works for someone else, the family member probably won't be able to come, too," she said.

   * You have guaranteed income: Once you sell your practice, you have no guarantee of an ongoing income, Grant said. Dr. Brown said the only real job security in today's medical marketplace is the patients. If one mismatched patient leaves your practice, there still are plenty of others. However, if there is a mismatch between a doctor and his or her employer, it could leave the doctor without a job.

   * Your practice is filling a need: Dr. Goertz said there are certain areas in the country that will need independent small practices because their location doesn't attract a large number of physicians or large groups.

   * You don't have to work around the clock: Dr. Brown said most areas have hospitalists, who free solo practice physicians from making those rounds. "That really freed up my time in the last 10 years," he said. Dr. Goertz said physicians can retain their independent practices, but share after-hours calls with other independent practices.

   * Your practice can make a good income: "The biggest fear of some doctors is they won't be able to make it financially. I believe that is an irrational fear," Dr. Brown said. He said small physician practices like his can survive, provided doctors know the nuts and bolts of business. For instance, he said practices tend to be too heavy on the payroll side. "My rule of thumb is one employee per doctor," said Dr. Brown, who offers tutorials at his office to show doctors how they can successfully operate on their own. You can cut costs by not buying expensive décor and sharing overhead with other practices, Dr. Goertz said.

 

Grant said small practices can grow their income by bringing in additional cash revenue through ancillary products like weight management, hormone balance, allergy management, nutrition supplements and an on-site pharmacy. "Should someone's weight loss be managed by franchise owners or by doctors?" Grant asked. She added, however, that not all these ancillaries are allowed in all states. Doctors can't do pharmaceuticals in New York, for instance, she said.

 

   * It makes you happy: Last, but not least, is the personal satisfaction factor. Experts say many established physicians and new residents went into medicine to be in their own practice, and that is what makes them happy. A heavy college debt load and other economic factors cause them to look for a set income and other perks of being an employee. But Dr. Goertz advised, "Doctors shouldn't look at just the monetary gain they could get from selling their practice. They need to look inside themselves and ask will they be happy."

 

ANALYSIS: Insurers's Bait and Switch

Iwatch, June 30, 2011

 

Firms lure consumers into 'high deductible' plans with lower premiums. But guess what happens later?

 

More and more Americans are falling victim to one of the most insidious bait-and-switch schemes in U.S. history. As they do, health insurance executives and company shareholders are getting richer and richer.

 

This industry-wide plot explains how health insurers have been able to reap record profits during the recent recession as the ranks of the uninsured and underinsured continue to swell.

 

It also explains why the insurance industry and its allies are pulling out all the stops to kill a measure in the California legislature that could protect state residents from losing their homes and being forced into bankruptcy if they get seriously sick or injured.

 

On June 2, the California Assembly passed AB 52, a bill that would give state regulators the authority to reject excessive health insurance rate increases. Similar legislation has been introduced in other state legislatures, but nowhere are the stakes higher than in California—not only because AB 52 would allow the insurance commissioner to turn down requests for unjustifiably high rate hikes, but also because it would enable the commissioner to reject increases in deductibles as well.

 

Over the past several years, insurers have been implementing a strategic plan to “migrate” (their term) all of their policyholders out of traditional indemnity and managed care plans into so-called “consumer-driven” plans, which feature high deductibles. They have been luring people into these plans by setting premiums for high-deductible plans lower than HMOs and PPOs, at least initially.

 

At first glance, these plans appear to be a good deal to a lot of people.  Not only are the premiums relatively more affordable, but also the deductibles usually appear to be manageable—again, at least at the outset.

 

Insurers are aggressively marketing high-deductible plans, and one of the marketing ploys used by some of the biggest for-profit insurers is the “do-as-we-do” sales pitch. CIGNA and UnitedHealth started a trend in the industry a few years ago of going “full replacement,” meaning they forced all of their employees out of their HMOs and PPOs and into high-deductible plans.  They want their employer customers to do the same.

 

I was still serving as head of corporate communications at CIGNA when the company went full replacement. If we wanted to continue receiving subsidized coverage, we had no choice but to leave our HMOs and PPOs and enroll in a high-deductible plan.  Many employees, especially those in jobs that paid far less than the executives who made the decision to go full replacement, protested to the human resources department, but to no avail.

 

One of the rationales for going full replacement is that if employers don’t do that, workers who are older or who have chronic conditions requiring expensive care will stay in their low-deductible managed care plans rather than to switch voluntarily to a high-deductible plan—at least as long as they have that choice.

 

As young and healthy people happily desert managed care plans for high-deductible options to take advantage of lower premiums, the folks who remain in the HMOs and PPOs will see their premiums skyrocket, eventually making those plans unaffordable for both employers and their workers.

 

Former California Insurance Commissioner and now Congressman John Garamendi saw this coming several years ago and did his best to halt the growth of high-deductible plans, but he had no real power to do so. He told reporters in 2005, while still serving as insurance commissioner, that high-deductible plans would eventually result in a “death spiral” for HMOs and PPOs.  This would happen, he predicted, as insurers and employers initially cherry-picked the youngest, healthiest and richest customers while forcing managed care plans to charge more to cover the sickest patients.

 

Garamendi, regrettably, was prescient, although probably even he would be amazed at how fast the forced exodus from HMOs and PPOs would be and how soon the day would come when plans with affordable copayments would be a thing of the past.

 

The industry’s long-term strategy is to move all Americans into high-deductible plans, and they’re well on their way to achieving that goal. America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s PR and lobbying group, bragged earlier this month that high deductible plans coupled with a health savings account (HSA) grew 14  percent last year alone.

 

Many of the people who made that statistic possible undoubtedly had experiences similar to my son, Alex, who was initially enrolled in a Blue Cross PPO. To take advantage of lower premiums, he switched in 2009 to a “consumer-directed” plan with a $500 annual deductible. When that policy came up for renewal at the end of the year, Blue Cross notified him and thousands of other policyholders that their monthly premiums would increase by 65 percent unless they switched to its “Personal Choice Value HSA.”  Alex couldn’t afford to pay 65 percent more in premiums, so he switched to the HSA, only to find out later that he would be facing a tenfold increase in the annual deductible, from $500 in his old plan—which, by the way was being discontinued—to $5,000 in the “Value” HSA. On top of that, Blue Cross had also eliminated some of the benefits he had been using in his old plan.

 

I noted in a previous column that Kaiser Permanente, California’s biggest insurer, was part of an industry-led effort to kill AB 52 in the state senate.  Kaiser, which pioneered managed care plans in the 1930s, joined the high-deductible bandwagon a few years ago to stay competitive. A substantial percentage of its policyholders are now enrolled in such plans. And like many other insurers, Kaiser is now demanding that many of the policyholders who were enticed into those plans with the promise of lower premiums fork over much more money this year. People throughout California who enrolled in Kaiser’s high-deductible plans in years past are facing rate increases of up to 24.8 percent this year, according to the company’s filings with the California Department of Insurance.

 

And once insurers have people locked into these plans, they are free in most states to raise the deductibles to astronomical heights, as Anthem Blue Cross has done in Maine and Indiana.

 

Earlier this year, many people enrolled in Anthem’s plans in Maine, especially it’s high-deductible plans, told then-insurance superintendent Mila Kofman that they already were barely able to make ends meet because of what Anthem was forcing them to pay.

 

Campground owner Mike Stella told Kofman that all of his salary and part of his wife’s goes to health insurance. “Another rate increase is probably going to put us over the top,” the Portland Press Herald quoted him as saying.

 

Stella said he and his wife pay nearly $1,000 a month in insurance premiums, and they must spend $17,000 a year—more than his annual salary—on premiums and medical care before their Anthem policy starts to cover their costs.

 

Another small business owner, John Costin of Kennebunk, said Anthem had notified him that the monthly premium for his $30,000-deductible family policy—yes, $30,000—would be going up from $580 a month to $624 this year.

 

“We ration our health care,” he said. “We do whatever we need to for the kids (but) my wife and I delay trips to the doctor. We don’t fill prescriptions.”

 

Matters could be even worse for the Stellas and Costins if they lived in Indiana, where Anthem’s for-profit parent company, WellPoint, is based. In Indiana, annual family deductibles for Anthem’s CoreShare Plan go as high as $50,000.  Just stop for a moment for that to sink in. There are not many American families that could spend $50,000 a year out of their own pockets for care and not face bankruptcy. More than half of American families don’t even earn $50,000 a year.

 

So now you see why insurance companies are spending millions of their policyholders premium dollars lobbying federal lawmakers to weaken last year’s health care reform bill to allow them to continue marketing these outrageous plans at the same time they’re lobbying state lawmakers to kill legislation that would empower regulators to reject excessive increases in rates and deductibles.

 

By being able to shift more and more of the costs of care from them to American families, they will continue to rack up record profits.  Good luck finding a single insurance company executive or shareholder who will express any concern—or even any interest—in the lives of millions of people ruined by such greed.

 

Quality, Not Quantity

The Economist, June 16, 2011

 

Private firms are taking baby steps to curb soaring health costs.

 

ABOVE a valley in Pennsylvania sits an old hospital that gives an optimistic hint about the future of American health care. Geisinger Health Systems was founded in 1915 but is as adaptable and creative as a start-up. It has invented new ways to offer services: it provides heart surgery, for example, at a fixed price and with a warranty. (If there are complications within 90 days, you pay nothing to fix them.)

 

Geisinger is changing the way it delivers primary care, co-ordinating teams of doctors and nurses to keep more people healthy for less money. Barack Obama sometimes praises the organisation in speeches. His health reform includes a programme to promote a model much like it. Alas, Geisinger’s chief executive, Glenn Steele, is one of many hospital bosses who think the new programme will not work.

 

America spends far more on health care than other countries, such as Britain (see article). The waste is staggering (see chart). The main problem is loopy incentives. Under “fee-for-service” arrangements, the more tests, scans and pokes with gloved hands a hospital or clinic provides, the more it is paid. Mr Obama’s health reform included only a few small nudges to change this.

 

Topmost among them is a plan for Medicare to reward “accountable care organisations” (ACOs) for keeping people healthy, rather than lavishing treatment on them. The plan seems sensible enough. But it has provoked uproar in every corner of the health industry. This month the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the body that oversees government health schemes for the old and the poor, was barraged with irate letters about it.

 

An entrenched system is hard to change. Hospitals currently have little incentive to keep patients healthy. On the contrary, fitter patients would mean lower volumes and smaller margins, says Michael Nugent of Navigant Consulting, an expert on ACOs. Nevertheless, the current system is clearly unsustainable.

 

Wonks have buzzed about ACOs for years. In 2005 CMS began a pilot with ten health systems, including Geisinger, to reward them for improving the quality of care while lowering costs. America is dotted with examples of reform. Utah’s Intermountain Healthcare is a hospital system with its own health plan. Clever use of data has helped to streamline care: a new protocol for delivering babies has reduced the number of unplanned caesarean sections and saved about $50m a year.

 

Insurers are experimenting with reform as well. Aetna, Humana and Wellpoint are testing new payment models. In Massachusetts, Blue Cross Blue Shield has created an “alternative quality contract” that gives hospitals a fixed budget for a patient, with additional rewards for improving the quality of care. In the programme’s first year hospitals cut the number of unnecessary emergency-room visits by 22%.

 

“The train is moving in the right direction,” says Mark McClellan, a former head of CMS who has championed ACOs. Real progress, however, requires change in the public sector. Medicare, the public health programme for the old, provides a whopping 35% of American hospitals’ revenue.

 

CMS’s proposed rule for ACOs would allow doctors, hospitals and other health providers to form networks to co-ordinate Medicare patients’ care. CMS would reward ACOs that save money, relative to a predetermined benchmark, while meeting certain standards of quality.

 

Alas, the regulations are a mess. “The ACO policy is an example of why the government is not always a great change agent,” sighs Chip Kahn, president of the Federation of American Hospitals. The insurance lobby frets that the rules will prompt hospitals to merge, reducing competition and driving up prices. The American Hospital Association says that the rewards for saving money are too low and the risks too high. The rules include 65 quality measures, more than twice the number in CMS’s earlier, smaller pilot. “I was very disappointed with their over-specificity,” says Geisinger’s Dr Steele. Advocates for ACOs, such as Dr McClellan, hope that the final rules will be different.

 

CMS is likely to make at least some changes to the programme. “I’m delighted to have the feedback,” says Donald Berwick, CMS’s boss. Last month Dr Berwick unveiled a few new enticements for ACOs, such as more flexible rules for experienced hospitals such as Intermountain. But it is unlikely that the ACO programme will be in place by January, as originally planned.

 

Dr Berwick points to other efforts to spur reform, including a pilot scheme to improve primary care and new penalties for hospitals where too many patients acquire new diseases or are readmitted because their treatment failed. The trick will be aligning these programmes with one another—and with innovations in the private sector. Health-care reform is like brain surgery, only harder.

 

California Insurer Says It Will Cap Earnings

New York Times, June 7, 2011

 

Blue Shield of California, a large nonprofit health insurer that has come under sharp criticism in recent months for its double-digit rate increases, said on Tuesday that it planned to cap its earning and refund the bulk of any excess income to its policyholders.

 

The insurer said it would limit its profit to no more than 2 percent of its revenue and said it already planned to return $180 million, the profit the company says it made above its 2010 target.

 

“With our 2 percent pledge, we hope to make coverage a bit more affordable for our members,” Bruce Bodaken, Blue Shield’s chairman and chief executive, said in a speech at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco. “But more important, we want to demonstrate that health care affordability, which is the key to universal coverage, is Blue Shield’s top priority.”

 

In a telephone interview, Mr. Bodaken said: “It’s one further step in a long series of steps in which we believe that we and others all need to step up and reduce the cost of health care.”

 

While it is unclear whether other insurers will make similar pledges, the federal health care law is aimed at making sure insurers are not able to set their premiums too much above their costs. Some experts expect other insurers to take similar actions as the law goes into effect.

 

“This would be the logical next step,” said Timothy S. Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University, who said some insurers have already started considering similar refunds. Last September, for example, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina said it planned to refund $156 million to policyholders.

 

Blue Shield of California said it would refund $167 million to policyholders, typically giving them a 30 percent credit toward one month’s premiums. A family of four, for example, may receive $250 toward the cost of a policy. Hospitals and doctors that participate in programs aimed at better coordinating care for patients will receive $10 million, and the insurer’s foundation will receive $3 million.

 

As a nonprofit, the insurer does not generate returns for investors but uses any money it earns to further its mission.

 

An early proponent of many of the changes in the federal health care law, Blue Shield has been the target of public outcry. Like many nonprofit insurers, Blue Shield has been criticized for seeking large premium increases and for maintaining overly generous reserves. Federal and state regulators are increasingly scrutinizing the rate requests of all insurers because of the federal health care law, and medical costs have been lower than many companies had anticipated, leading to substantial profits.

 

Mr. Bodaken said the decision to limit profits was made well before state insurance regulators raised concerns about its rate increases. Earlier this year, Blue Shield bowed to pressure from regulators and consumer groups and dropped a request for higher rates. “It really has nothing to do with our rate increases,” he said.

 

California lawmakers are considering legislation that would give state regulators the authority to approve insurers’ rate requests before they go into effect. Federal and state officials emphasized that Blue Shield’s actions did not diminish the need for strong regulatory oversight.

 

Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said in a statement: “While such voluntary efforts are great for Blue Shield’s policyholders in California, today’s announcement also reinforces the importance of the Affordable Care Act and rigorous state review of insurance rates.”

 

California’s state insurance commissioner, Dave Jones, who has pushed for state legislation that would allow him to block excessive rate increases, said Blue Shield’s action demonstrated the need for the law. “The announcement is an admission by an insurer, in this case a nonprofit insurer, that they are making excessive profits,” he said.

 

The insurer’s profits about doubled from 2009 to 2010 and he said its $3.5 billion in reserves were higher than regulations require.

 

Consumer advocates also emphasized that Blue Shield’s pledge did not change the need for regulators to make sure insurers were not charging people too much. “Certainly, there are some consumers who will be getting rebates who will welcome the news,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of Health Access California, a state advocacy group. Still, he said, “consumers should not be overcharged on the front end.”

 

Given the recent outcry over its high rate requests and the generous pay package of its chief executive, which amounted to $4.6 million last year, Blue Shield may be trying to improve its image, Mr. Wright said.

 

To address the high cost of health care, Mr. Bodaken said that insurers like Blue Shield must work with hospitals, doctors and patients to address some of the underlying cost pressures. But he said the insurer’s goal was to demonstrate that it was not seeking higher profits when it asked for higher rates.

 

“It makes it very clear that we are not about profits,” he said. “We are about getting people health care they need and deserve.”

 

Insurers Told to Justify Rate Increases Over 10 Percent

New York Times, May 19, 2011

 

WASHINGTON — Alarmed at soaring premiums and profits in the health insurance industry, the Obama administration demanded on Thursday that insurers justify proposed rate increases of more than 10 percent, starting in September.

 

Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, issued a final rule establishing procedures for federal and state insurance experts to scrutinize premiums. Insurers, she said, will have to justify rate increases in an environment in which they are doing well financially, with profits exceeding the expectations of many Wall Street analysts.

 

“Health insurance companies have recently reported some of their highest profits in years and are holding record reserves,” Ms. Sebelius said. “Insurers are seeing lower medical costs as people put off care and treatment in a recovering economy, but many insurance companies continue to raise their rates. Often, these increases come without any explanation or justification.”

 

Federal health officials proposed the 10 percent threshold in December. The insurance industry criticized it as an arbitrary test that could brand a majority of rate increases as presumptively unreasonable. But the administration rejected the criticism and insisted on the 10 percent standard in the final rule, issued Thursday.

 

Starting in September 2012, the federal government will set a separate threshold for each state, reflecting trends in insurance and health care costs.

 

In some states like New Hampshire, groups of more than 20 workers have experienced premium increases of around 20 percent this year, while smaller groups have seen increases of 40 percent or more. At the same time, insurance agents say, coverage is shrinking as deductibles have increased and insurers limit the choice of hospitals.

 

To ensure that “consumers get value for their dollars,” the new health care law required annual reviews of “unreasonable increases in premiums.”

 

Under the new rule, federal and state officials will review rates in the individual and small-group insurance markets. In effect, the administration said, large employers can take care of themselves, as they are more sophisticated purchasers and have more leverage in negotiating with insurers.

 

Federal officials acknowledged that they did not have the authority to block rates that were found to be unjustified. But they said many states had such authority, and the federal government is providing $250 million to states to strengthen their capacity. A small number of states, opposed to the federal health care law, have turned down the money.

 

The new rule says a rate increase is unreasonable if it is excessive, unjustified or “unfairly discriminatory.” An increase is deemed excessive if it is “unreasonably high in relation to the benefits provided.”

 

Consumer advocates generally welcomed the rule. “The days of insurance companies running roughshod over consumers and jacking up rates whenever they want are over,” said Ethan S. Rome, executive director of Health Care for America Now, a coalition that includes labor unions and civil rights groups.

 

Insurers said the rule did nothing to address the underlying costs of health care, which they described as the main factor driving up premiums.

 

“If we believe health care costs are crushing the economy, we ought to have a debate about how to bring costs under control,” said Karen M. Ignagni, president of America’s Health Insurance Plans, a trade group. “Focusing on premiums diverts attention from that debate.”

 

In many cases, Ms. Ignagni said, rate increases of more than 10 percent may be justified by rising health costs and the tendency of younger, healthier people to drop coverage, forcing up costs for other policyholders.

 

States will have the primary responsibility for reviewing rate increases. “But if a state does not have the authority or the resources to conduct a review, our department will step in,” said Ms. Sebelius, a former state insurance commissioner in Kansas.

 

Under the rule, as part of an effective rate review program, states must have “a mechanism for receiving public comments” on proposed rate increases.

 

Elizabeth P. Sammis, the acting insurance commissioner in Maryland, said this would be a big change. In many cases, she said, consumers learn of premium increases when they receive notices in the mail, and then they call the commissioner’s office to ask, “Why are rates going up?”

 

Tactics For Tight Times: How to Keep Your Practice Afloat

Amednews, May 16, 2011

 

When a physician practice's cash flow slows, there are many strategies for coping until the stream begins running again.

 

In 2008, the cash flow of the medical practice of Daniel Lensink, MD, an ophthalmic plastic surgeon in Redding, Calif., slowed to a trickle. A large insurer significantly cut reimbursement rates for covered reconstructive procedures. The recession meant that fewer patients were having noncovered cosmetic procedures. He had plenty of Medicare patients to fill up his schedule, but as expenses went up, Medicare pay rates stayed flat.

 

"When I entered medicine, there was a promise that if I took care of everybody who came my way, I could make a living," said Dr. Lensink, who has a solo practice with three full-time employees. "I didn't realize I could be busy and go broke at the same time."

 

His practice has returned to financial health, but, like many others, seasonal variations, economic fluctuations, regulatory changes, issues with private payers, severe weather and office burglaries all can create a cash crunch. There are several ways a practice can ride out these storms and survive, although effective solutions vary. Choosing the wrong option can worsen the situation.

 

"Physicians should think of themselves as small-business owners, or they are going to go under," said Claudia Gruss, MD, a gastroenterologist and a partner at Arbor Medical Group, which has three offices in southwestern Connecticut.

 

Dr. Lensink got through the rough patch by tapping into a long-established but previously unused home equity line of credit.

 

"I had the home line of credit for a rainy day, and I was afraid to ask [for a business loan] when the banks were in such turmoil. I just didn't think they would lend money to a business in the red, and I had that home-equity line of credit sitting there," he said.

 

Experts recommend that practices hold three to six months of cash in reserve to cover any shortfalls. This is common advice for nearly any business or individual managing personal finances, but many physicians say money is so tight that this may be unfeasible.

 

"My practice has a lot of expenses, and it's not possible at this point," said Warren Brandle, MD, a family physician in solo practice in Gold River, Calif. His practice has an unsecured line of credit that has been tapped into three times in 13 years to help pay taxes.

 

Borrowing from yourself

 

Unable to build or maintain a practice reserve, many physicians access other options. The most common step is to tap into personal reserves or defer salary. For instance, Dr. Lensink didn't pay himself in 2009, although he did cover the payroll for his staffers. Dr. Gruss frequently defers her compensation in the first few months of the year, when cash is tight.

 

"Payroll comes No. 1," Dr. Gruss said. "We have to make payroll, and we have to pay the bills."

 

Deferring salary is really a form of lending to the practice, but linking personal and professional funds in this way is risky. Most practices are in some type of corporate structure to protect personal assets, but the protection can be lost if personal and professional funds are merged.

 

"Once the money is put into the practice entity, it becomes available for creditors," said Bob Berg, an attorney with EpsteinBeckerGreen in Atlanta who works with medical practices. "If a physician commingles their personal stuff with their business stuff and they stop following corporate procedures, that raises a whole different risk. It's called piercing the corporate veil. Some could allege that a physician did not follow corporate formalities, and this could put the physician's personal assets at risk."

 

Aside from dipping into personal funds, there are other resources for short-term borrowing.

 

The credit crunch has loosened somewhat, and physicians are attractive to banks and other sources of credit. Medical practices can contact a bank for a secured or unsecured line of credit, preferably before problems occur.

 

"It's worth talking to a bank now," said Manoj Pawar, MD, vice president of clinical operations and physician leadership development at Catholic Health Initiatives in Englewood, Colo. "When there is a problem with cash flow, they are not going to be as open to talk to you."

 

Experts recommend that practices have access to a credit line that can cover at least three to six months of operating expenses. "You want to have access to six and hope you only have to use three," said Michael Fleischman, a principal at GatesMoore, a health care consulting and accounting firm in Atlanta.

 

Secured lines tend to have lower interest rates and usually are connected either to a medical practice's assets or accounts receivables.

 

If a practice owns a medical office building, this is not usually a source of additional lending. Most medical practices that own their offices hold them in a separate corporation, and borrowing against the building and then having the corporation lend to the practice could get incredibly complicated.

Other solutions

 

Borrowing, however, may not be the only answer. If short-term cash-flow problems commonly occur in the beginning of the year, a practice can leave some money in the practice from the final months of the previous year to pay for next year's bills. Doing this depends on the practice's corporate structure.

 

"Where doctors get in trouble is when they are taking out every cent on a monthly basis," said David Wold, CEO of Health Information Services in Park Ridge, Ill. "It creates a lot of stress for the practice."

 

Experts recommend that practices conduct an audit to determine where cash is going out and whether it is coming in appropriately. Audits can address cash shortfalls when they occur but also may be a way of preventing those shortfalls.

 

"The first goal is really to make sure [the shortfall] doesn't happen," said Marc Lion, president of the National CPA Health Care Advisors Assn.

 

"And if it does happen, take a look at your billing, collection and denial-management procedures."

 

This can be carried out within the practice or by an outside consultant or accountant. "It all depends on the skill set of the folks that are there to be able to tell you about the shape of your practice," said Kevin Weinstein, vice president of marketing at ZirMed, a revenue cycle management company in Louisville, Ky.

 

If an outside entity is brought in, the price of an audit or revenue analysis would vary widely. It can be as much as a few thousand dollars per physician, although experts said the payback can be significant.

 

People who conduct audits say expenses are rarely the root of the problem. The way money comes in is usually the issue. "We always try to look at ways to work with practices to lower expenses, but the more common problem is billing," Fleischman said.

 

For instance, if a practice is having problems with cash flow at the beginning of the year, is it possible to collect more at the time of service? When a patient has met a deductible, can insurance claims be submitted more quickly? Are they usually submitted correctly?

 

"Revenue cycle management is so critical, especially when the co-pay and the deductible are 20% to 30% of the total," Dr. Pawar said.

Looking at all concerns

 

Audits also may identify other issues. Office staff might not be following up on denied claims. Claims may not be coded properly.

 

Is the front desk verifying insurance and collecting appropriate co-pays? The problem could rest with payers. Are they paying the practice the contracted rate? Are some services being bundled inappropriately? Is reimbursement being made to the practice in a timely fashion? Comparing the practice to benchmark data from the Medical Group Management Assn. and other organizations may be a way of detecting problems.

 

"You want to understand what you are actually collecting and what you are not collecting," Weinstein said.

 

For example, a few years ago, Eric Ramos, MD, a solo family physician in Modesto, Calif., was outsourcing his medical billing and noticed that his accounts receivables were growing but that his balance sheet was not. So he brought the billing back in-house to keep it under tighter control.

 

"If you don't manage billing, if you don't oversee things in your practice, you are going to go bankrupt," Dr. Ramos said. "It's very difficult for a physician to be a practitioner and a business person at the same time, but you have to make sure that the business end is working well, is productive and is well-managed."

 

He has borrowed money from his family to keep his practice going, but these loans have been repaid.

 

Such an analysis may reveal staffing problems that explain why various billing procedures are not being completed. Having too many people run the practice can get expensive. Having too few means that some tasks that bring money into the practice, such as submitting clean claims and following up on denials, are not getting done.

 

"Sometimes you need to spend more money to bring money in," Fleischman said.

 

As for Dr. Lensink, he is slowly paying off the home-equity line of credit that helped his practice survive. He opened a second office in Oregon, where insurance pay rates tend to be higher than his home state of California. He is now able to cover his salary, and his practice is back in the black.

 

Accountable Care Organizations in Health Reform Decoded

PBS NewsHour, May 3, 2011

 

Anybody who's got more than one medical condition knows the drill. You go to the cardiologist with a heart problem. You go to the orthopedic surgeon if your back hurts. You find an oncologist if you need chemotherapy.

 

They all get paid by an insurance company or the government (if you're on Medicare or Medicaid) or by you. But it's rare when all three doctors talk to each other and they almost never compare notes. You see each one of them in a kind of vacuum. And you, the patient, are left to figure out what each piece of your medical puzzle means to the other.

 

Meanwhile, the chances are good that all three doctors have ordered expensive tests that may duplicate each other.

 

It could be that the back problem has something to do with your heart problem or the cancer is causing one of the other two conditions to get worse. But the only way you'll ever find out is if you take all of your doctors out to dinner, sit them down at the table and lock the restaurant door.

 

Fragmentation and unnecessary testing are two of the hallmarks of medical care in the United States. They're also a major factor in what's driving the cost of health care through the roof. The Kaiser Family Foundation has just released its annual report on health care spending in the United States and found that $7,538 a year is now spent on each American. That's at least $2,535 more or 51 percent higher than Norway, the next largest per capita spender.

 

The rate of growth in health care spending is also going up faster than any other industrialized nation. If this trend keeps up it won't be many years before health care accounts for more than a quarter of the nation's gross domestic product.

 

Enter a new idea: The Accountable Care Organization (ACO), a key provision in the new federal healthcare law.

 

One of it's promoters is Dr. Eliott Fisher who for 30 years has headed the Dartmouth Atlas which painstakingly has documented the discrepancies in American health care, and although questions have been raised in some quarters about the research, most health policy professionals rely on the work.

 

Dartmouth found that a person who lives in one county could have health care costs of more than $15,000 a year, while his neighbor one county over with the same condition costs $5,000 a year. And the guy who has the $15,000 tab is no better off health wise than the neighbor who cost the system $5,000.

 

So Fisher suggests that doctors, hospitals and other providers get together and coordinate care for their patients. The idea is that these ACOs would improve medical care to patients and save money.

 

Theoretically, these health care providers would get together and decide what the average cost per year is to treat people who live in that part of the country, and stick to that amount. At the end of the year, providers who can prove their patients got better care and didn't spend all of the pre-set amount of money would get to pocket the savings.

 

Dartmouth found that a person who lives in one county could have health care costs of more than $15,000 a year, while his neighbor one county over with the same condition costs $5,000 a year.

 

That would mean you would no longer have to go one place for your heart, another for you back and still another to get chemotherapy. You would get one stop shopping all within this group of doctors. And guess what? The doctors would all TALK to each other about your various medical conditions.

 

Some so called integrated health systems have been practicing this kind of medicine for years. The Cleveland and Mayo Clinics come to mind, along with the Geisinger Health System in western Pennsylvania. But they are hospital systems where the doctors are on salary, not paid for each service they provide like most of the rest of the country. That's called fee for service.

 

Under the new ACO concept doctors would still be paid on a fee for service basis. But Fisher and other supporters of this idea believe better coordinated care would spell less expense because there would not be so many duplicative tests performed. And another point, these ACOs would all have electronic medical records so the computers could talk to each other.

 

Rules from the federal government on how to do these Accountable Health Organizations recently were made public after months of anticipation in health policy circles.

 

Basically, they say there should be at least 5,000 patients in each ACO. Groups of doctors would form networks where patient information was shared. There would be doctors, health care providers and Medicare recipients on each ACOs board of directors. And the population of each ACO would consist entirely of Medicare patients at the outset.

 

When the rules were announced, Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius said Accountable Care Organizations will "improve the quality of care patients receive and help lower costs."

 

Another major figure in the movement to ACOs is Dr. Mark McClellan who heads the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution. He also knows his way around the federal government, having served as both Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

 

Dr. McClellan told the PBS NewsHour online that ACOs will "enable care providers to get paid more when they do what they really want to do for patients--provide better care at a lower cost."

 

"It's not a silver bullet," he said, but "done right it can be an important new resource for health care providers."

 

Dr. Jay Goldsmith, who's an associate professor of Health Science at the University of Virginia is not so sure. He is not a fan of ACOs. He thinks the new networks will be nothing more than "a cost containment compact between ad hoc care providers and Medicare," and he says "this is going to be something that is done to patients, not WITH them."

 

After reading 102 pages of the new regulations which cover 472 pages, Dr. Goldsmith said: "I have this huge headache. I'm going to get up at 5:30 tomorrow morning, drink three cups of coffee and see how much father I make it before I get another headache."

 

Goldsmith doesn't see that much difference between Accountable Care Organizations and Managed Care plans run by Health Maintenance Organizations in the 1980's, which were a flop because they were a "value system" which made doctors make choice to compromise care.

 

Some members of the American Medical Association are also skeptical of ACOs. Dr. Jeremy Lazarus, speaker of the AMA's House of Delegates, told American Medical News ACOs will only work is doctors want to participate. "For this to happen," he said, "significant barriers must be addressed, including the large capital requirements to fund an ACO and to make required changes to an individual physician's practice."

 

Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian CATO Institute was more blunt. He said he gives the concept of ACOs "zero percent" chance of making significant savings and he doubts doctors will want to join because they "will get paid less."

 

So the verdict is out. But it doesn't take rocket science to understand the U.S. must do something about the amount of money it's spending on everyone's health care. Experts on both sides of this ACO argument agree on that -- so starting soon the Accountable Care Organization will get its day in court.

 

Patients Are Not Consumers

The New York Times, April 21, 2011

 

Earlier this week, The Times reported on Congressional backlash against the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a key part of efforts to rein in health care costs. This backlash was predictable; it is also profoundly irresponsible, as I’ll explain in a minute.

 

But something else struck me as I looked at Republican arguments against the board, which hinge on the notion that what we really need to do, as the House budget proposal put it, is to “make government health care programs more responsive to consumer choice.”

 

Here’s my question: How did it become normal, or for that matter even acceptable, to refer to medical patients as “consumers”? The relationship between patient and doctor used to be considered something special, almost sacred. Now politicians and supposed reformers talk about the act of receiving care as if it were no different from a commercial transaction, like buying a car — and their only complaint is that it isn’t commercial enough.

 

What has gone wrong with us?

 

About that advisory board: We have to do something about health care costs, which means that we have to find a way to start saying no. In particular, given continuing medical innovation, we can’t maintain a system in which Medicare essentially pays for anything a doctor recommends. And that’s especially true when that blank-check approach is combined with a system that gives doctors and hospitals — who aren’t saints — a strong financial incentive to engage in excessive care.

 

Hence the advisory board, whose creation was mandated by last year’s health reform. The board, composed of health-care experts, would be given a target rate of growth in Medicare spending. To keep spending at or below this target, the board would submit “fast-track” recommendations for cost control that would go into effect automatically unless overruled by Congress.

 

Before you start yelling about “rationing” and “death panels,” bear in mind that we’re not talking about limits on what health care you’re allowed to buy with your own (or your insurance company’s) money. We’re talking only about what will be paid for with taxpayers’ money. And the last time I looked at it, the Declaration of Independence didn’t declare that we had the right to life, liberty, and the all-expenses-paid pursuit of happiness.

 

And the point is that choices must be made; one way or another, government spending on health care must be limited.

 

Now, what House Republicans propose is that the government simply push the problem of rising health care costs on to seniors; that is, that we replace Medicare with vouchers that can be applied to private insurance, and that we count on seniors and insurance companies to work it out somehow. This, they claim, would be superior to expert review because it would open health care to the wonders of “consumer choice.”

 

What’s wrong with this idea (aside from the grossly inadequate value of the proposed vouchers)? One answer is that it wouldn’t work. “Consumer-based” medicine has been a bust everywhere it has been tried. To take the most directly relevant example, Medicare Advantage, which was originally called Medicare + Choice, was supposed to save money; it ended up costing substantially more than traditional Medicare. America has the most “consumer-driven” health care system in the advanced world. It also has by far the highest costs yet provides a quality of care no better than far cheaper systems in other countries.

 

But the fact that Republicans are demanding that we literally stake our health, even our lives, on an already failed approach is only part of what’s wrong here. As I said earlier, there’s something terribly wrong with the whole notion of patients as “consumers” and health care as simply a financial transaction.

 

Medical care, after all, is an area in which crucial decisions — life and death decisions — must be made. Yet making such decisions intelligently requires a vast amount of specialized knowledge. Furthermore, those decisions often must be made under conditions in which the patient is incapacitated, under severe stress, or needs action immediately, with no time for discussion, let alone comparison shopping.

 

That’s why we have medical ethics. That’s why doctors have traditionally both been viewed as something special and been expected to behave according to higher standards than the average professional. There’s a reason we have TV series about heroic doctors, while we don’t have TV series about heroic middle managers.

 

The idea that all this can be reduced to money — that doctors are just “providers” selling services to health care “consumers” — is, well, sickening. And the prevalence of this kind of language is a sign that something has gone very wrong not just with this discussion, but with our society’s values.

 

FAQ On ACOs: Accountable Care Organizations, Explained

Kaiser Health News, March 31, 2011

 

Accountable care organizations take up only seven pages of the massive new health law yet have become one of the most talked about provisions. This latest model for delivering services offers doctors and hospitals financial incentives to provide good quality care to Medicare beneficiaries while keeping down costs. A cottage industry of consultants has sprung up to help even ordinary hospitals become the first ACOs on the block.

 

Yet the concept has been short on details. ACOs have been compared to the elusive unicorn: everyone seems to know what it looks like, but no one has actually seen one. But the health care industry has already embarked on a frenzied quest to create them as quickly as possible. Today, after many delays and false starts, the Obama administration proposed guidelines on how ACOs will work.

 

Here is a brief guide to what we know about ACOs.

 

What is an accountable care organization?

 

An ACO is a network of doctors and hospitals that shares responsibility for providing care to patients. In the new law, an ACO would agree to manage all of the health care needs of a minimum of 5,000 Medicare beneficiaries for at least three years.

 

Think of it as buying a television, says Harold Miller, president and CEO of the Network for Regional Healthcare Improvement and executive director of the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform in Pittsburgh. A TV manufacturer like Sony may contract with many suppliers to build sets. Like Sony does for TVs, Miller says, an ACO would bring together the different component parts of care for the patient – primary care, specialists, hospitals, home health care, etc. – and ensure that all of the "parts work well together."

 

The problem today, Miller says, is that patients are getting each part of their health care separately. "People want to buy individual circuit boards, not a whole TV,” he says. “If we can show them that the TV works better, maybe they'll buy it," rather than assembling a patchwork of services themselves. "But ACOs will need to prove that the overall health care product they’re creating does work better and costs less in order to encourage patients and payers to buy it."

 

When will ACOs begin operating?

 

The ACO initiative is scheduled to launch in January 2012, but the race to form ACOs has already begun. Hospitals, physician practices and insurers across the country, from New Hampshire to Arizona, are announcing their plans to form ACOs, not only for Medicare beneficiaries but for patients with private insurance as well. Some groups have already created what they call ACOs.

 

Why did Congress include ACOs in the law?

 

As lawmakers search for ways to reduce the national deficit, Medicare is a prime target. With baby boomers entering retirement age, the costs of the program for elderly and disabled Americans are expected to soar.

 

ACOs would make providers jointly accountable for the health of their patients, giving them strong incentives to cooperate and save money by avoiding unnecessary tests and procedures. For ACOs to work they’d have to seamlessly share information. Those that save money while also meeting quality targets would keep a portion of the savings. But some providers could also be at risk of losing money.

 

HHS estimates that ACOs could save Medicare up to $960 million in the first three years. That’s far less than one percent of Medicare spending during that period. If the program is successful, it can be expanded by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

 

How would ACOs be paid?

 

In Medicare’s traditional fee-for-service payment system, doctors and hospitals generally are paid more when they give patients more tests and do more procedures. That drives up costs, experts say. ACOs wouldn’t do away with fee for service but would create savings incentives by offering bonuses when providers keep costs down and meet specific quality benchmarks, focusing on prevention and carefully managing patients with chronic diseases. In other words, providers would get paid more for keeping their patients healthy and out of the hospital.

 

If an ACO is not able to save money, it would be stuck with the costs of investments made to improve care, such as adding new nurse care managers, but would still get to keep the standard Medicare fees. The law also gives regulators the ability to devise other payment methods, which would likely ask ACOs to bear more risk. For example, an ACO could be paid a flat fee for each patient it cares for.

 

How would an ACO be different for patients?

 

Primary care doctors who are part of an ACO would be required to tell their patients. But although physicians will likely want to refer patients to hospitals and specialists within the ACO network, patients would still be free to see doctors of their choice outside the network without paying more. ACOs also will be under pressure to provide high quality care because if they don’t meet standards, they won’t get to share in any savings – and could lose their contracts.

 

Who's in charge — hospitals, doctors or insurers?

 

Hospitals, doctors and insurers are all vying to run ACOs. Kelly Devers, a senior fellow at the nonprofit Urban Institute, explains that the question was left purposely vague in order to be flexible. "We know there are a range of provider organizations" that could manage an ACO, "but we don't know which one is superior."

 

Some regions of the country, including parts of California, already have large multispecialty physician groups that may become an ACO on their own, likely by networking with neighboring hospitals. "A lot of health care organizations are going to dust off the existing structures they had in place" in the past, Devers says.

 

In other regions, large hospital systems are scrambling to buy up physician practices with the goal of becoming ACOs that directly employ the majority of their providers. Because hospitals usually have access to capital, they may have an easier time than doctors in financing the initial investment required by an ACO.

 

Some of the largest health insurers in the country, including Humana, United Healthcare and Cigna, already have announced plans to form their own ACOs. Insurers say they can play an important role in ACOs because they track and collect data on patients, which is critical for coordinating care and reporting on the results.

 

If I don't like HMOs, why should I consider an ACO?

 

ACOs may sound a lot like health maintenance organizations. "Some people say ACOs are HMOs in drag," says Devers. But there are some critical differences – notably, an ACO patient is not required to stay in the network.

 

Steve Lieberman, a visiting scholar at the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution and the president of Lieberman Consulting Inc., explains that ACOs aim to replicate "the performance of an HMO" in holding down the cost of care while avoiding "the structural features that give the HMO control over [patient] referral patterns," which limited patient options and created a consumer backlash in the 1990s.

 

What can go wrong?

 

Lieberman cautions that ACOs are not a panacea. "ACO has become the three-letter health acronym of the year, if not the decade," he says. The health industry tends to operate with "kind of a herd behavior," rushing to implement an idea "without working through the detailed business questions of how they'll work."

 

Many health care economists fear that the race to form ACOs could have a significant downside: hospital mergers and provider consolidation. As hospitals position themselves to become integrated systems, many are joining forces and purchasing physician practices, leaving fewer independent hospitals and doctors. Greater market share gives these health systems more leverage in negotiations with insurers, which can drive up health costs.

 

But Lieberman says while ACOs could accelerate consolidations, it’s already "such a powerful and pervasive trend that it's a little like worrying about the calories I get when I eat the maraschino cherry on top of my hot fudge sundae. It's a serious public policy issue with or without ACOs."

 

Are there any possible legal concerns?

 

Doctors, hospitals and others in the health care industry have raised concerns that ACOs could run afoul of antitrust and anti-fraud laws, which try to limit market power that drives up prices and stifles competition. One concern is that ACOs, particularly those in rural markets, could grow so large that they would employ the majority of providers in a region.

 

To help providers avoid legal problems, the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division promises to provide an expedited antitrust review process for these new doctor-hospital partnership.

 

Is Medicaid Real Insurance?

Kaiser Health News, March 25, 2011

 

As governors across the land struggle with fiscal pressures and pepper the federal government with requests to scale back Medicaid – many people are losing sight of the fact that health care reform (what some call ObamaCare) requires a huge expansion of Medicaid.

 

In fact, in just three years the nation is expected to start insuring about 32 million uninsured people. About half will enroll in Medicaid directly. If the Massachusetts experience is repeated, most of the remainder will be in heavily subsidized private plans that pay providers little more than Medicaid does.

 

That raises an important question: How good is Medicaid? Will the people who enroll in it or in private plans that function like Medicaid get more care, or better care, than they would have gotten without health reform? The answer to that question is not obvious. In fact it's probably fair to say that we are about to spend close to $1 trillion over the next 10 years insuring the uninsured and we really don't know what we expect to accomplish by spending all that money.

 

Here's a stab at an answer. The 32 million newly insured may not get more health care. They may even get less care – because of difficulties getting a doctor. And even if they do get more, odds are that low-income families as a group will get less care than if there had never been a health reform law in the first place. The reason: the same measure that insures 32 million new people also will force middle- and upper-middle-income families to have more generous coverage than they now have. As these more generously insured people attempt to acquire more medical services they will almost certainly outbid people paying Medicaid rates for doctor services and hospital beds. To make matters worse, the health reform law (following the Massachusetts precedent) did nothing to increase the supply side of the market to meet the increased demand.

 

Both anecdotal and scholarly reports from Massachusetts are consistent with this prediction. The wait to see a family doctor in Boston is now longer than in any other U.S. city. More people are going to emergency rooms for their care in the state than before its health reform became law. A Boston cab driver went through a list of twenty doctors (a list the state's Medicaid program gave her!) before she found a doctor who would see her. A preliminary report on the state as a whole found that nearly a quarter of adults who were in fair or poor health reported being unable to see a doctor because of cost during the implementation of the reforms. Further, state residents earning less than $25,000 per year were much less likely than higher earners to receive screening for cardiovascular disease and cancer.

 

That brings us back to the initial question: Is Medicaid real insurance? Or is there little practical difference between being on Medicaid and being uninsured? It would appear at the margin that there's not much difference.

 

Currently there are roughly 10 million people in the U.S. who are eligible for Medicaid and CHIP but have not bothered to enroll. That implies that for about one in every six eligibles, Medicaid insurance is not worth the effort it would take them to fill out the enrollment papers!

 

Consider the case of Dallas emergency rooms. At Parkland Memorial Hospital both uninsured and Medicaid patients enter the same emergency room door and see the same doctors. The hospital rooms are the same, the beds are the same and the care is the same. As a result, patients have no reason to fill out the lengthy forms and answer the intrusive questions that Medicaid enrollment so often requires. At Children's Medical Center, next door to Parkland, a similar exercise takes place. Medicaid, CHIP and uninsured children all enter the same emergency room door; they all see the same doctors and receive the same care.

 

Interestingly, at both institutions, paid staffers make a heroic effort to enroll people in public programs -- working patient by patient, family by family right there in the emergency room. Yet they apparently fail more than half the time! After patients are admitted, staffers go from room to room, continuing with this bureaucratic exercise. But even among those in hospital beds, the failure-to-enroll rate is significant.

 

Clearly, Medicaid enrollment is important to hospital administrators. It determines how they get paid. Enrollment may also be important to different sets of taxpayers. It means federal taxpayers pay more and Dallas County taxpayers pay less. But aside from the administrative, accounting and financial issues, is there any social reason we should care?

 

Economics teaches that people reveal these preferences through their actions. If people act as though they are indifferent between being uninsured and being on Medicaid, we may infer -- based on this behavior -- they are equally well off in both states of the world from their own point of view.

 

Against this conclusion, there are two counter arguments worth considering. First, some claim that transactions costs (administrative difficulties) are the real reason why so many eligibles don't enroll. At Parkland and Children's Hospital those costs are close to zero, however. Second, there is the argument from paternalism: that people will be better off if we push them into Medicaid, whether they prefer it or not.  But even on that score, the evidence is weak. A very comprehensive RAND study found that the type of insurance people have -- or whether they are insured at all -- does not affect the quality of care they receive. With respect to cancer care, it is unclear that Medicaid matters very much. Health blogger Avik Roy has written about other studies that find that Medicaid patients do no better and sometimes worse than the uninsured. Additional evidence is supplied by Scott Gottlieb . If you're trying to get a primary care appointment, it appears your chances are better if you say you are uninsured.

 

Health economist Austin Frakt takes issue with these studies, claiming that Medicaid and non-Medicaid populations are fundamentally different, even after adjustment for race, income and other socio-economic factors. That claim seems improbable, however, in light of the heavy ping-pong migration of people in and out of Medicaid eligibility. Frakt points to some studies  finding that Medicaid makes a positive difference over being uninsured. But the results would probably have been just as good or better if we spent the money giving free care to vulnerable populations. Moreover, even with their Medicaid cards, enrollees turn to emergency rooms for their care twice as often as the privately insured and the uninsured.

 

Bottom line: after we get through 10 years of spending our $1 trillion under ObamaCare, there is no convincing reason to believe that the bottom half of the income distribution will have more care, better care, or better access to care than they have today.

 

5 ways meaningful use will change your practice (HIMSS meeting)

Amednews, March 21,2011

 

Practicing medicine will present new challenges and opportunities after new rules are implemented -- for you and for your patients.

Complying with meaningful use rules can earn bonus money for your practice from Medicaid or Medicare -- but it also can shake up the way your office operates and the way you interact with patients.

 

As hospitals and practices prepare for attestation of having met the requirements, many convened at the 2011 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society annual conference in February in Orlando, Fla., to learn what they can expect after going electronic.

 

Meeting meaningful use will involve more than receiving incentive pay up to $44,000 from Medicare or nearly $64,000 from Medicaid for using an EMR. It means a lot of work -- and adjustment by you and your staff.

 

Those changes are expected to trickle down even to those who have no plans to seek the incentives, said Natalie Berger, PhD, chair of the HIMSS Ambulatory Information Systems Committee. So physicians need to prepare. "Right now it's only Medicaid and Medicare providers ... getting those reimbursements. But eventually [private] payers are going to follow those guidelines. And then I think patients are going to demand it. It's no longer going to be OK to go to a doctor's office that doesn't have your records or doesn't know you are allergic to those medications."

 

Some of the changes EMRs bring will be for the better, some for the worse, depending on how the change is managed. Much of the 2011 HIMSS conference focused on those changes, and how physician practices and hospitals could prepare for them. Many discussions revolved around five basic themes: patient engagement; reporting; collaboration; efficiencies; and security and privacy.

Patients will be more involved in their care

 

With more information in their hands because of meaningful use, and more data available to physicians at the time of a visit, patients are going to be more involved in health care decisions, experts said at HIMSS. One way meaningful use rules address this is by granting patients access to medical records, including diagnostic results, problem lists and medication lists.

 

Many practices and hospitals already provide this access through patient portals, many of which combine data with patient education tools. Some of these organizations offered a glimpse of what other practices can expect when the physician-patient relationship is changed by technology.

 

Michael Solomon, PhD, is practice lead of eCare Management at the Coral Springs, Fla.-based health information technology consulting firm Point-of-Care Partners. He and researchers from the Carolinas Healthcare System conducted a 12-week controlled randomized study of 220 patients using the portal offered to patients of Carolinas Physician Network, a large medical group operated by CHS. They analyzed the effectiveness of the portal to engage patients and affect patient outcomes.

 

"If we expect the patient to play a critical role in a patient-centered approach to care, then we need to measure the effect of care intervention on a patient's level of engagement -- that is, how activated they are in their own health care," Solomon said. The group found that the more patients used the portal, the more engaged they were in their health care.

 

For Miramont Family Medicine, a family medicine practice in Fort Collins, Colo., adopting an EMR meant that patient visits were more meaningful because of the information available and collected at the time of visit. John Bender, MD, a family physician at Miramont, said "value-added time" -- time patients actually spend with doctors as opposed to sitting in waiting rooms -- improved from 64% to 67% after implementation.

 

"Now that doesn't sound large," he said, "But a 3 [percentage point] improvement across all 10,000 patients we were seeing at the time -- that's huge."

 

Dr. Bender said this was especially significant, given that the average appointment time increased from 41 to 51 minutes after going electronic. Doctors are documenting several metrics they weren't documenting before, and patients "are getting a lot more time per visit with the physician."

 

Doctors will find it easier to see how they're doing

 

Stephen Wagner, PhD, vice president of Carolinas Healthcare System, division of medical education and research, said patients can be engaged, but measures are needed to see how that engagement has affected their outcomes.

 

"We're very good in health care at finding things that make lots of intuitive sense, and then we find out sometimes too late or way down the road that they really aren't working the way we thought they would," he said. "We need better intermediate markers."

 

EMRs are expected to make these intermediate markers easier to measure what is and isn't working. Before Miramont installed an EMR, Dr. Bender said, only 42% of diabetic patients had an A1c documented within the past year. Since implementation, the practice improved its metrics reporting to 91%.

 

"We all think we're doing a good job but had no way of knowing that. We had to find out where we are," he said. "We finally knew how many diabetic patients we had."

 

"Doctors are Type A. You give them a report card and ... then they start working really hard and they will fix [the problems]. And they will do it on their own without being told," he said.

 

Physicians will collaborate more with other doctors

 

When physicians are making decisions about a patient's care, "it's not about the data, it's about the knowledge that you create," said Hal Wolf, senior vice president and chief operating officer of the Permanente Federation, which represents Kaiser Permanente's eight Permanente Medical Groups.

 

Wolf said elderly, chronically ill patients see, on average, 14 physicians. Those doctors collectively write an average of 50 prescriptions a year during the course of 37 clinical visits.

 

The interoperability spelled out under meaningful use means that measures of progress physicians have access to also are available to other members of the patient's care team. This interoperability, and the subsequent collaboration of care team members, will help ensure that integrated patient-centered models of care being created because of meaningful use are successful.

 

EMRs "create a fully integrated approach to an entire effort to take care of a patient," he said. "When you have the information, as you all know, you have turned the magical corner, because every caregiver is looking at one up-to-date record in basic real time as needed. That is a tremendous step forward."

 

Dept. of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in her keynote address to HIMSS attendees that, on a national level, having this integration will make it easier for doctors to compare treatments quickly and cheaply to see what works. "Those same records connected together can help spread the knowledge at the speed of light throughout our health care system. In the Obama administration, we look at health IT not just as an opportunity to grow our economy but also as a powerful tool to help improve the health of our nation."

 

Despite all the promises of improved efficiencies and quality of care, experts are quick to warn that practices need to identify inefficiencies before even looking at an EMR. They must know how an EMR system will help solve those inefficiencies. Otherwise, they could be made worse by going electronic.

 

You must build a foundation before you implement and have a clear plan for execution, said Paul Kleeberg, MD, clinical director of REACH, the federally funded regional extension center serving Minnesota and North Dakota. The execution plan needs to address work flow and process problems that, if not addressed, will plague EMR adoption.

 

"Turning on the [EMR] will be like shining the flashlight in the corner. You get to see all the cockroaches," Dr. Kleeberg said.

 

"That which was bad before gets worse," said Tina Buop, chief information officer of Muir Medical Group in Walnut Creek, Calif. When a practice goes electronic, there will be a "beacon light" shining on poor work practices.

 

She used the example of physicians taking patient files home at the end of the day. "It's now a beacon light, because everyone will now know they didn't finish charting that day."

 

Buop said the importance of training and work flow tracking during implementation cannot be overstated, because work flow changes when a new technology is introduced.

 

After implementation, physicians might discover new data that come to doctors electronically. But a lot of the work of charting that data can be delegated to medical assistants or nurses. Otherwise, physicians may find that the workday has gotten longer, she said.

 

Physicians will need a firmer grip on data security

 

One area that is a relatively minor provision in the stage 1 meaningful use requirements, but needs to be a major focus of any adoption plan, is patient privacy and security, Buop said.

 

The stage 1 requirements include only one line on security and privacy, she said. "And it's a shame, because privacy and security, honestly, can be one of the biggest nemeses of the success of stage 2 and stage 3" meaningful use criteria.

 

Under stage 1, a gap risk assessment needs to be conducted that will identify security and privacy vulnerabilities. Stages 2 and 3 have not yet been finalized but will focus on an increased use of data, which could create more vulnerabilities.

 

The confidentiality, integrity and availability of data is part of the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act, which is separate from meaningful use, Buop said.

 

"If you are a solo practitioner with your own EMR and are trying to qualify for meaningful use, you are responsible for the information for privacy and security," she added. That means you need processes in writing that ensure confidentiality, integrity and availability of data.

 

Pittsford, N.Y., pediatrician Alice Loveys, MD, is the chief medical information officer for the Monroe County Medical Society Health Information Technology Service Bureau, which assists physicians in technology issues. She strongly suggests that practices have a HIPAA security manual in place at the start of implementation. The manual is something a practice develops and writes itself that details how it ensures the security of patient information.

 

She said developing the manual is no small feat, and something that the RECs cannot do for a practice, because each one is unique to that practice. But the REC can help direct doctors to other resources that can help.

 

So, You Want to Become a Medical Home

Here's how to Get Started

Physicians Practice, March 15, 2011

 

You are probably hearing a lot about patient centered medical homes (PCMH) these days. Perhaps an insurance company that you participate with has sent you information about a medical home incentive or you've learned that your state Medicaid program pays additional fees to practices that have PCMH accreditation. Whatever your level of interest, considerable investment in time, resources, and money is required for practices to make the transition to becoming accredited as medical homes. To help you assess your readiness and make the transition, here are a few guidelines to get you started:

 

Assess your practice

 

1. Take a look at your practice's current policies and procedures to determine if your practice operations currently meet with the basic tenets of a PCMH. Looking at the NCQA survey standards for PCMH is a good place to start.

 

2. Determine if adjustments need to be made to foster the creation of a patient-centric culture throughout your organization. Sometimes, making adjustments to the culture of your practice can be the biggest hurdle.

 

3. Identify gaps in processes and policies and move forward with developing a plan of action that will allow your practice to meet all standards for recognition as a PCMH. Some of the items that may need to be addressed include:

 

• Staffing needs and education

• Technology — current needs and efficient usage

• Patient outreach, tracking, and follow-up

• Evidence based medicine and decision support

• Care coordination, resource integration, and care management

• Scheduling and access

 

4. While a practice does not have to obtain NCQA recognition as a medical home (or other certifying bodies), doing so greatly increases the credibility of your practice's model and provides leverage for payment discussions at the payer level.

 

Create a plan of action

 

1. Once you've identified the gaps, determine how best to fill them. You'll need to create a solid and implementable plan of action. This will require you to draft protocols and train staff on how to work within them; implement scheduling changes; improve resource utilization through reallocation and job enhancements; and improve patient education.

 

2. After you’ve begun implementing these changes, monitor your progress regularly to see how you are doing. Re-assess your practice against the standards you are using and make sure that you are able to meet a majority of them, so you have the best chance of achieving the highest level of certification.

 

Apply for certification

 

Submitting an application for accreditation can be a daunting process. In addition to providing protocols and policies, there is a lot of supporting documentation that needs to be submitted, along with the application fee. You may also need to gather three months worth of data to prove that criteria for accreditation are being met. But don't be discouraged, the benefits to your practice will more than make up the inconvenience.

 

Educate your patients

 

Lastly, educate your patients on the medical home model and their responsibility for participating in their own care. You can advertise your practice's PCMH accreditation in your reception area and exam rooms, and also post this information on the practice website. You should explain what a patient centered medical home is and how it benefits your patients. Two ways to accomplish this are: 1) publishing a short article in your practice newsletter and 2) creating a pamphlet on the PCMH to be distributed to your patients. Also, don't forget to give your patients a "being responsible for your own care" brochure to get them actively involved in playing their part too.

 

When done right, transforming your practice to a medical home model can reap big dividends in improved patient care, more effective practice operations, and a better bottom line.

 

Susanne Madden, MBA, is founder and CEO of The Verden Group, a consulting and business intelligence firm that specializes in practice management, physician education, and healthcare policy. She can be reached at madden@theverdengroup.com or by visiting www.theverdengroup.com.

 

P4P Programs Help Improve Care – Most Of The Time, Study Finds

Health Resource Online, March 7, 2011

 

Everyone enjoys a pay raise for a job well done – physicians are no exception – but in some instances, financial incentives for healthcare performance may actually backfire.

 

That’s the conclusion of a UCLA study, showing that patient-care performance ratings for 25 medical groups across California improved significantly following the launch of a statewide patient-care performance in 2004. Incentives focusing on doctor productivity were a different matter.

 

Hector P. Rodriguez, assistant professor in UCLA’s School of Public Health and his colleagues found evidence that certain kinds of financial incentives for the purpose of improving patient care, in combination with public reporting of medical group performance ratings, have a positive effect on patient care experiences. They also found that some types of incentives may have a negative overall impact on how patients experienced their care.

 

Rodriguez looked at how medical group performance ratings changed over time and found that ratings in specific measures, representing three broad categories – physician communication, care coordination and office-staff interactions – improved substantially during the period after the start of the Integrated Healthcare Association’s (IHA) patient-care performance program.

 

Incentives for addressing the quality of patient-clinician interaction and the overall experience of patient care tended to result in improved performance in those areas, especially when the additional funds were used broadly by medical groups to positively reinforce a patient-centered work culture.

 

The greatest improvements were seen within those groups that placed less emphasis on physician productivity and greater emphasis on clinical quality and patient experience. Within groups where financial incentives were paid directly to physicians, Rodriguez found that placing too much emphasis on physician productivity actually had a negative impact on the experiences patients had when visiting their primary care physician.

 

Medical groups were free to use the additional funds in various ways, with some groups paying incentives directly to physicians and others using the incentives more broadly, focusing on organizational priorities. The groups also participated in a public reporting program in which ratings in two of the three broad categories were released annually to the public in the form of a "healthcare report card" comparing the performance of the medical groups and insurers to one another.

 

Rodriguez’s research team based its findings on information collected from 124,021 patients of 1,444 primary care physicians at 25 California medical groups between 2003 and 2006. It conducted interviews with group medical directors to determine how financial incentives were used. All 25 groups, which represent six insurers, were awarded financial incentives for achievements in the broad categories of clinical care processes, patient care experiences and office-based information systems, in accordance with IHA’s program.

 

Monopolies Threaten Health Care Cost Controls

The Fiscal Times, February 3, 2011

 

Beyond the legal challenges, a major new hurdle is emerging for the health care reform law. Recent studies show that the major players in the health care marketplace – insurers, hospitals and physician practices – are consolidating, which increases the likelihood they will collude on prices charged to employers and to consumers and defeat cost control measures in the law.

 

Government officials are already grappling with the issue as they move to implement one of the signature cost control elements of reform – the formation of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). Conceived as a delivery system alternative to health maintenance organizations, ACOs are supposed to achieve greater coordination of care by linking together physician practices and hospitals, and will be financially rewarded if they improve quality while lowering costs.

 

The rules for ACOs, which are being written now, won’t go into effect until next year and will only apply to the Medicare market. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is likely to endorse several different payment models, the law calls for sharing savings when the Medicare payments for beneficiaries covered by the ACO fall below recent regional trends.

 

Top officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are already worried some of the new entities will become a vehicle for recouping Medicare losses. Raising rates in the private market would ultimately undermine any short-term savings achieved by Medicare, since increases in a region’s top line health care tab would eventually force Medicare to raise its own rates.

 

“There will be parties out there who want to repackage what they do and call it an ACO,” CMS administrator Donald Berwick told a forum at the Brookings Institution earlier this week. “We have to maintain the integrity of markets and not let concentrated entities emerge.”

 

That’s exactly what happened in California over the last decade after hospitals merged and physicians joined large independent practices to counter the price-dictating bargaining power of insurance industry HMOs. The number of hospital beds shrank, hospital prices doubled and overall health care costs rose 10.6 percent between 1999 and 2005, which was even higher than the unacceptably high national health care inflation, according to a recent study of the California market.

 

A national study conducted for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that after the merger wave between 1990 and 2003, 90 percent of large metropolitan area hospitals wielded excessive market power as defined by the Federal Trade Commission. The study suggested the mergers raised prices by anywhere from 5 to 40 percent (depending on how close the merged facilities were to each other) and probably led to lower quality.

 

The fear now is that “ACOs could make an existing problem marginally worse,” said Robert Berenson, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, who conducted the California survey. “The issue is market power.”

 

It isn’t just mergers and consolidation that give provider groups greater market power. Sometimes insurers need to include prestigious institutions within their networks – like Cedars Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, which caters to Hollywood stars and is the focal point for their high-profile charitable endeavors. No insurer can afford not to have Cedars Sinai in its network, even though it charges the highest fees in the state and has Medicare utilization rates more than twice the national average, according to the Dartmouth Atlas of Health.

 

Some large hospital chains use their dominant status in a few of their markets to drive up rates everywhere in the chain. Sutter Health, for instance, which has more than two dozen medical centers and hospitals in separate northern California cities, requires insurers to sign “all or none” contracts, according to Berenson.

 

Blue Shield of California, a major insurer in the state, wanted CMS to set the ground rules for ACOs. “In order to qualify for safe harbor treatment under antitrust laws,” Paul Markovich, chief operating officer of Blue Shield, wrote, the agency must insist that “an ACO . . . that is part of a multi-provider network or system . . . will not require payers to negotiate with the network or system on an all-or-nothing basis that would require the payer to include network or system facilities or physicians that are not part of the ACO.”

 

Meanwhile, the insurance industry continues to come under fire from consumer groups and the medical profession for its monopolistic practices. While the insurance exchanges, which were ruled unconstitutional by a Florida federal court earlier this week, were designed to address the lack of competition in the individual and small group market, they will have minimal impact on large groups which deal mainly with major insurers like UnitedHealth, Wellpoint, Cigna and Aetna.

 

The American Medical Association’s bi-annual survey of the nation’s health insurance marketplace, released Tuesday, found 60 percent of the nation’s metro areas where two insurers had a combined share of 70 percent or more of the market. That’s up from 53 percent two years ago.

 

“High concentration levels in health insurance markets are largely the result of consolidation, which likely has led to the exercise of market power and, in turn, harm to consumers and providers of care,” the report said. “Past and future consolidation of health insurers should raise serious antitrust concerns.”

 

America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade group, commissioned a study the last time the AMA issued its report that faulted its methods. “Research examining competition in health care markets increasingly points to provider consolidation as a significant factor contributing to rising health care costs,” said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade group.

 

Most experts who study the dysfunctional health care marketplace say both sides are correct when it comes to accusations about excessive market power. “I would say both provider and insurer concentration are problematic to high quality, efficient and sustainable health care system,” said Len Nichols, director of the Center for Health Policy Research and Ethics at George Mason University. “In different markets, insurers, hospitals or physician groups wield disproportionate market power. Where one has it, the others and consumers suffer.”

 

The net effect of these dueling monopolies, he said, is that providers can easily demand higher prices. Insurers, because they face minimal competition, simply pass those costs along. The tab for both is paid by employers, families and government agencies.

 

The Federal Trade Commission, which didn’t file any cases against hospital mergers between 1999 and 2007 and has only filed three since, promises to step up its monitoring of the health care sector. But it generally looks favorably on the emergence of ACOs, at least as conceived under the reform law. “We need to make sure that they drive down health care costs,” FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz said recently, “but vertical integration can sometimes be good.”

 

“We’ll have a better chance of holding down costs through rate regulation than by using antitrust,” argued Berenson of the Urban Institute. “Where there is a dominant insurer or two, there is no competitive pressure to take on provider market power. It is easier to get along.”

 

Physician Compensation Models: Big Changes Ahead

NEJM, January 2011

 

The emergence of health reform and a burgeoning arena of physician and hospital payment reforms are spawning a new crop of buzzwords and ways of paying physicians for their services. Most industry watchers agree that the fee-for-service (FFS) system is on its way out because it primarily rewards volume with only minor attention given to high-quality care or acceptable patient outcomes.

 

Although FFS’s replacement hasn’t been developed, the movement toward a new payment model has begun. The way physicians are compensated will evolve as pay-for-performance programs mature and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and commercial payers proceed with medical home pilots, ACOs, global or bundled payments, and episode-of-care reimbursement. Practices and hospitals that participate in such pilots will likely revise compensation to reflect the changes in reimbursement and revenue flow that occur when organizations assume the task of allocating funds to physicians.

 

On the plus side, changes associated with health reform are expected to translate into improved physician reimbursement for previously poorly compensated or uncompensated services, improved quality, and better care coordination. However, some physician organizations are understandably concerned that payment reforms, as well as compensation structures based on them, could have problematic consequences.

 

In the American Medical Association’s (AMA’s) recent report, “Pathways for Physician Success Under Healthcare Payment and Delivery Reforms,” author Harold Miller, executive director of the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, cites one example. If separate services are bundled into an episode or combined for the purposes of a single payment, physicians’ payment may then depend on the number or cost of services other providers deliver. Likewise, physicians could be docked for poor quality care delivered by another physician.

 

Although it’s unlikely that the emerging payment models will directly affect physicians’ paychecks in the next year, that change is surely coming, predicts Benjamin Isgur, director of PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Health Research Institute. As reimbursement changes and ACOs and other models move into the marketplace, physicians should expect compensation model adjustments. “There is a lot more tinkering with these incentive mechanisms now,” Mr. Isgur reported. “Over the next two to four years, step two will be that as reimbursement changes, how employed physicians are compensated will change as well. But how do you develop the right mix between salary, and quality and patient experience incentives? That’s very top of mind right now for hospital executives.”

 

Internist and infectious disease specialist Ardis Hoven, MD, chair of the AMA board of trustees and a frequent speaker on health and payment reform, urges physicians to educate themselves about current payment systems and stay abreast of and participate in reform developments.

 

“Participation in ongoing quality improvement initiatives that help physicians collect data is an important first step as our system begins to explore transitioning away from a strictly fee-for-service model,” Dr. Hoven said. “The AMA will continue to provide physicians with information and educational resources on evolving payment and delivery models that aim to optimize quality patient care.” She cited the AMA’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement, which develops evidence-based clinical quality measures for use at the point of care. Many of those measures have been adopted in public and private health programs such as Medicare’s Physician Quality Reporting Initiative.

 

As the brave but uncertain world of health reform unfolds, what can physicians heading into initial practice opportunities or making a move to new ones expect in compensation models? Changes occurring now are mostly subtle, but there’s greater focus on quality incentives than in the past, suggested Jeffrey Milburn, a consultant with the Medical Group Management Association who focuses on physician compensation and financial management.

 

“The models we’re seeing appear to stress quality, production, and utilization incentives in the larger practices and integrated systems,” he observed. “Usually, these incentives amount to 5 to 10 percent of the base compensation, and some are set up as reward or risk only.”

 

What that means, Mr. Milburn explained, is that employing entities might use compensation “withholds” until physicians meet the objectives. That’s a model he doesn’t agree with because it’s inherently negative, but it is one that’s taking hold in some large organizations. On the other end of the spectrum, progressive organizations are focusing on the positives. “Some employers are using bonus-only models, with upside reward only and no downside risk.” In those arrangements, a hospital system may fund the bonus by giving physicians 90 percent of the potential sum until they meet certain objectives, at which point they receive all of the bonus compensation.

 

The trend toward employing physicians and devising multifaceted bonus structures has gained even more impetus in the past two years, as hospitals move toward tighter alignment with or even full ownership of physician practices. Although that model gained steam in the early 1990s, it all but disappeared a decade later when it proved a deterrent to productivity.

 

Incentive plans, regardless of how they’re structured, are becoming more prevalent in part because of the movement toward employment and away from private-practice partnership-track models, noted Peter Cebulka III, director of recruiting development and training for Merritt Hawkins and Associates (MHA) in Atlanta, Georgia. “Compensation models are a very hot topic now because of this growing trend toward employing physicians. Since 2006, we’ve seen a 43 percent drop in income guarantees,” Mr. Cebulka reported, referring to the compensation model frequently used to bring new physicians into established medical groups (see sidebar).

 

MHA data also shows a decline in salary-only compensation and loan forgiveness and a sharp rise in salary-plus-bonus models. Interestingly, even mid-career physicians making a move are opting for salaried employment with bonus options, Mr. Cebulka noted. “Experienced doctors who’ve run their own practice for years are seeking employment just as frequently as residents and fellows, but for different reasons,” he observed. “The residents and fellows are seeking salary plus bonus because they don’t feel capable of running a business in today’s complex medical-economic environment. The experienced physicians are capable of running a business, they just don’t want to anymore.”

 

These trends are revealed in findings from a May 2010 focus group of residents and fellows conducted by the national physician recruiting firm Cejka Search in St. Louis, Missouri. Nearly 82 percent of the 150 physician participants rated production incentives as either important or very important, and 78 percent preferred that model over either salary only or income guarantees. Only 6.5 percent preferred income guarantees, while 15 percent were drawn to salary-only positions.

 

“Generally, salary only is a turnoff. In conversations with hundreds of physicians every week, our consultants report that candidates are not interested in a straight salary, but a base-plus-production option. With many in debt, they want the opportunity to earn more than just a flat salary,” reported Lori Schutte, MBA, president of Cejka Search. “However, if productivity models are viewed as an attempt to manipulate physicians into working more, yet possibly paying them less, they will opt for a more secure, less risky model, thus salary only becomes more attractive.”

 

The era of physicians being able to choose from a reasonable variety of compensation models will likely end, Mr. Milburn predicts, if structures such as ACOs and episodes of care become predominant care-delivery models and payment based on outcomes, not services, takes hold. Physicians may also have to get used to assuming some of the financial risk their employing entities have traditionally absorbed.

 

“Newer doctors coming in will still receive the base compensation rate that they negotiate, I think, at least for the first few years. However, whoever hires and pays them ultimately will want to switch to a compensation model that reflects how they’re reimbursed,” Mr. Milburn said. “We won’t see this tomorrow, but it will evolve over the next few years and then employers will jump on this model.”

 

Insurer Medical Costs Falling - 1st Time in 10 Years

CNN Money, February 16, 2011

 

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- For the first time in 10 years, the U.S. health insurance industry is expected to report a decline in medical expenses, according to a new report by Weiss Ratings.

 

Weiss, an independent provider of insurance company ratings, based its findings on a study of 852 health insurers.

 

The study showed that medical costs fell 1.6% in the first nine months of 2010.

 

For all of 2010, Weiss estimates that insurers' medical expenses,will fall 3% less 'reinsurance costs' bought by health insurers to limit risk.

 

"This is a critical change from the steady and rapid increases of prior years," said Gavin Magor, senior insurance analyst for Weiss.

 

"If it continues in 2011, it should help boost health insurer profits while also pressuring them to curb premium increases and give consumers some much-needed relief."

 

Insurers have been increasing premiums between 6% and 8% every year, blaming the increases on the annual double-digit increases in cost of medical care.

 

Some insurers, such as Blue Shield of California, have recently threatened their customers with even more premium hikes of as much as 59%.

 

That makes the Weiss report even more startling.

0:00 /3:40The $50,000 bionic leg

 

Said Magnor, "It is a significant finding and it's hard to pinpoint the reasons for this change in trend at this point."

 

Even though total enrollment in health insurance declined slightly in 2010, Magnor said that downtick was not large enough to push medical costs lower.

 

However, Michael McRaith, director of Illinois department of insurance, says that while medical costs are actually rising, insurers may have taken steps to counteract the increases.

 

"It may be that as health care costs become increasingly expensive, insurers are more aggressively excluding people from coverage, denying payment of claims or more aggressively pricing coverage so that fewer people can afford to pay premiums," McRaith said.

 

"Any one of those reasons could explain why insurers are paying less or flat amounts on medical expenses at the same time that some publicly-traded insurers are reporting massive profits to shareholders," he said.

 

The report showed that among the companies that reported a decline in medical costs, Aetna's (AET, Fortune 500) medical expenses fell by 14.1% in the first nine months of 2010 versus the same period a year earlier.

 

Keystone Health Plan West's medical costs also fell by 11.1% in that period.

 

However, that decline wasn't felt across the board. Group Health's medical costs rose more than 16% while Blue Cross of Idaho saw a 12.9% increase in medical expenses in that period.

 

Weiss' study was based on mandatory data on medical expenses that health insurers provide to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

 

America's Health Insurance Plan, the trade group of health insurers, was not immediately available to comment on the report.

 

'Doc Fix' Proposal Seeks to Build Support for Administration's Healthcare Agenda

The Hill, February 14, 2011

 

The White House on Monday unveiled a budget proposal that prevents cuts in Medicare payments to doctors while leaving other healthcare providers largely unscathed.

 

The budget's two-year "doc fix" is seen as vital for building physician support for the healthcare reform law. One of the doctors' top priorities is the permanent repeal of Medicare's Sustainable Growth Rate, which mandates payment cuts that lawmakers regularly scramble to postpone.

 

"The administration's in a political battle with Republicans who are basically telling docs, if you support our goal of repealing (healthcare reform), we'll use the money (from the law's subsidies) for a doc fix," said healthcare analyst Alexander Vachon, a former Republican Senate aide. "The minimum bid here was a two-year doc fix."

 

Republicans have made a permanent repeal of the SGR part of House committees' mandate as they prepare replacement legislation for the healthcare reform law.

 

A two-year fix would give Congress through 2013 to find a permanent solution. Without it, physicians face a 28 percent cut in their reimbursements at the end of the year.

 

The American Medical Association initial response Monday was favorable.

 

"The President’s budget includes a renewed commitment to permanently fix the broken Medicare physician payment system, which the AMA strongly supports," AMA President Cecil Wilson said in a statement. "It also contains funding to delay the devastating cuts scheduled to occur January 1, 2012 for another two years, which is important for providing stability in the Medicare system while a permanent solution is enacted."

 

While placating the AMA, the administration is proposing $62 billion in offsets that largely avoid other providers such as hospitals and home health agencies. Instead, the budget proposal offers up White House and Democratic priorities that have so far failed to gain traction in Congress.

 

For example, the budget proposes saving $2.3 billion by getting generic versions of biologic drugs to market faster. The White House wants the brand-name drug makers to have only seven years of market exclusivity, but the healthcare reform law settled for 12 years following years of debate.

 

The nation's biotech industry association said the move contradicted President Obama's State of the Union address call to invest in research and technology.

 

"Under this proposal, most biotech firms would be unable to recoup their investments in new medicines which ordinarily top $1 billon and involve 15 years of research and development," the Biotechnology Industry Organization said in a statement.

 

The budget would also save $8.8 billion by restricting generic manufacturers' ability to drop patent challenges in exchange for cash payments from drug makers, another proposal that has so far failed to clear Congress.

 

The pharmaceutical industry would turn out to be the biggest loser in the president's health budget. Pharmaceutical companies agreed to $80 billion in cuts to help pass the healthcare reform law, and less than a year after it was enacted, the Obama administration is asking for more.

 

"We think that the beneficiaries of Medicare and Medicaid and the taxpayers of this country deserve to have the best possible outcomes with the most effective and cost-effective medications, and this is a move in that direction," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told reporters Monday afternoon.

 

President Obama's Medicare chief deflected a question about which offset proposals he expected to receive the most opposition in Congress.

 

"I don't know yet," said Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Don Berwick. "I think there have been some very wise choices made about where the pay-fors are going to come from."

 

How the Affordable Care Act Empowers States

The Washington Post, February 10, 2011

 

As governor of Kansas, I saw up close the urgent need for health-care reform. I heard it when factory owners told me their biggest concern was not manufacturing costs but rising insurance premiums, and when families said they felt like hostages to insurance companies that could deny or cancel coverage with little accountability. I saw it in our state budget, where rising health-care costs prevented investments in our future.

 

The Affordable Care Act puts states in the driver's seat because they often understand their health needs better than anyone else - and that is why it is so frustrating to hear opponents of reform falsely attack the law as "nationalized health care."

 

The truth is that states aren't just participating in implementation of the law; they're leading it.

 

Consider the state-based health insurance marketplaces that will be created under the law in 2014. These marketplaces, called exchanges, will allow individuals and small-business owners to pool their purchasing power to negotiate lower rates. They'll also serve as a one-stop shop where insurers must compete to deliver the best deal. Starting in 2014, members of Congress will have to purchase health coverage through these marketplaces as well.

ad_icon

 

Although the law gives states the option to design and run their own exchanges, some critics have claimed this could burden states if they're not given adequate resources and flexibility.

 

I agree. But what these critics miss is that the law already gives states most of the resources and flexibility they're asking for.

 

States have discretion, for example, to offer a wide variety of plans through their exchanges, including those that feature health savings accounts. Utah and Massachusetts already operate exchanges but take very different approaches: Utah allows all insurers to participate; Massachusetts has stricter standards. Under the law, both approaches could work.

 

States also have the flexibility to decide what benefits plans must offer. They can choose to require basic protections, based on the typical benefits people get through their jobs, or set higher standards.

 

And states' costs of designing their exchanges will be fully funded by the federal government through 2015, with additional funds available to help determine which residents are eligible.

 

Some critics have said there has not been enough analysis of how exchanges would affect employer-based insurance. But the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has closely studied this and estimated that only 24 million Americans will be insured through these marketplaces in 2019, compared with 162 million covered through the workplace.

 

The law gives states new flexibility in Medicaid, too. Beginning in 2014, states will be able to offer more affordable Medicaid benefits that resemble typical employer plans. Because costs of long-term care are driving the growth in Medicaid budgets, there are new options and federal support to help states bring down these expenses, such as through cost-effective care models like health homes.

 

The law does make Medicaid available to more working families. But the federal government will cover 96 percent of this expansion, and nonpartisan experts suggest that states will save money overall through reductions in the "hidden cost" they pay for uncompensated care provided to the uninsured.

 

The Affordable Care Act gives states incredible freedom to tailor reforms to their needs. The one thing the law does not permit is going back to the broken health insurance system we had a year ago.

 

Since the law was passed last March, our department has worked with states to keep premiums down, hold insurers accountable and give Americans more freedom in their health-care choices. Americans have gained the protection of a Patient's Bill of Rights that outlaws many of the insurance industry's worst practices. After years of decline, the number of small businesses offering health coverage is ticking up, partly because of tax credits available under the law. And the CBO has said that the law will reduce the deficit by $230 billion over the next 10 years.

 

I look forward to working with governors to build on these achievements. States are the laboratories of our democracy, and I will continue to welcome their ideas about how to improve the law or implement it more effectively. What we cannot do is allow this progress to be blocked or reversed by overheated rhetoric about a "government takeover of health care" - a claim that has now been so thoroughly debunked that it was named PolitiFact's 2010 "lie of the year."

 

The writer is secretary of health and human services.

Rethinking the Decision to be a Participating Provider

Physicians News, February 7, 2011

 

As many physicians have concluded, out-of-network insurance benefits pay better than the prevailing in-network rates.  Some practices have opted out, terminating their participation status with major insurance carriers.  The practices that have remained in-network, sitting on the sidelines watching this unfold, are realizing that they may be placed at a disadvantage for remaining a network participant.

 

The benefits of participation may be eroding.  Participation does not reward providers with reimbursement rates that reflect the physician’s level of service and clinical skills.  To the contrary, out-of network reimbursement seems to provide physicians with compensation that is more commensurate with the value they provide.  A physician’s participating provider status does not guarantee prompt payment or streamlined claims submissions.  The legislatures of many states have promulgated prompt payment statutes that benefit all providers, regardless of participation status.[1] Many physician specialties are a referral-driven business.  While some patients use the insurance company’s provider directory to select a physician, many patients base their decision to receive treatment at a particular physician specialty based on the recommendation of their primary care physician.  Orthopedic surgeons, dermatologists and neurologists are but a few of the physician specialties that receive their patients by the referral of another physician.  Other patients use the yellow pages to select a physician.  Participation status, by itself, generally does not drive the patient’s choice of physician specialty.[2] So, why participate?

 

The Benefits Participation do not Accrue to the Provider

 

A provider’s participation with an insurance carrier contractually locks in the insurer’s cost for medical services.  The participating provider contract specifies a fee schedule which places limits on the physician’s reimbursement for services rendered.  From the insurer’s perspective, a provider’s participation is a great mechanism for controlling costs and predicting expenses.  The insurer has economies of scale, and is able to use its market presence to ratchet down reimbursement rates.  The patient also benefits from a provider’s participation, through the depressed contractual reimbursement allowances.  Additionally, the patient can also estimate treatment costs through the existence of a fixed fee schedule.  Physicians generally have little to no leverage in negotiating with insurance carriers over fees.  (Exceptions to this generalization sometimes exist depending on the size of the physician group or the type and availability of the particular type of physician specialty.)   Consequently, from a reimbursement perspective, the benefits of a physician’s participating provider status belong to the insurance carrier and patient.

 

In contrast, the physician may benefit by electing to pursue a non-participating provider status.  Many insurance carriers reimburse out-of-network providers on a usual, customary and reasonable (“UCR”) basis.  A usual, customary and reasonable basis almost always exceeds the in-network reimbursement structure.  The caveat to this non-participation strategy is that patients utilizing a non-participating provider face higher deductibles, copayments and co-insurances.  The insurance carrier, too, is also exposed to higher service costs.  To combat this, the insurance carrier typically designs out-of-network benefits with a higher out-of-pocket patient cost structure as a disincentive for its members to stray outside of its established participating provider network.  Insurers also may include an “anti-assignment” provision in their contract with the members.  Anti-assignment clauses invalidate a patient’s assignment of benefits without the consent of the insurance carrier.  With an anti-assignment clause, the insurance carrier sends the policy benefit payments to the plan subscriber, not to the physician.  Unfortunately, when payments are sent to the patient, the physician sometimes has a difficult time recouping them.  Courts generally enforce these clauses against the out-of-network medical provider, rationalizing that these clauses “are valuable tools in persuading health [care] providers to keep their costs down.”[3]

 

The Hurdles Facing Non-Participating Providers

 

The non-participating physician must grapple with the reality that services at his/her practice will cost the patient more than service at a participating provider.  Assuming that all office visits are equal, the reality becomes that the patient must spend more money to receive treatment at the non-participating physician.  For most consumers, there is little decision making necessary when faced with an option to purchase a product “A” at store #1 for $60, or the option to purchase the same product “A” at store #2 for $100.  To thwart the insurer’s financial disincentives for the patient’s use of a non-participating provider, the private practice could provide inducements to patient.  It would appear that providers have a duty to inform the patient whether the clinic is participating or non-participating.  Less clear is whether the provider has any ethical duty to inform the patient that out-of-network services will result in greater out-of-pocket expense to the patient.

 

Exceptional service and value are inducements that the physician may offer to substantiate the higher cost to the patient.  Value is extremely relative in today’s medical marketplace.  As copayments and deductibles have risen in recent years, so too have the patient’s expectations.  Higher out of pocket costs have generally led consumers to demand more.  Value may be demonstrated in many ways, ranging from board certifications, acclaim, and bedside manner.   The non-participating provider should be able to substantiate the difference in price to the value-conscious patient.  The adage, “you get what you pay for” should be apparent.  Exceptional service can be exhibited in a number of ways, and is not limited to clinical excellence.  Hours of operation and the clinic’s appearance are just a couple of the ways in which a practice may differentiate itself to warrant the out-of-network cost differential.

 

A more controversial strategy to induce patients to use a non-participating provider is a “level the playing field” approach.  This “leveling of the playing field” approach equalizes the patient’s cost of using an out-of-network provider (non-participating) with that of an in-network provider (participating).   From the patient’s perspective, the cost of receiving care at an in-network practice is no different than receiving care at an out-of-network practice.  This is accomplished through the out-of-network practice’s honoring of the patient’s in-network benefits with respect to the patient’s out-of-pocket costs.  However, the practice will still charge the insurance carrier the usual, customary and reasonable amounts.  To illustrate, if the patient has a $500 deductible for an in-network provider and a $1500 deductible for an out-of-network provider, the non-participating provider charges the patient the amount of the in-network deductible ($500) and waives the balance of the out-of-network deductible.  [Note: the author is not advocating this strategy, but is commenting on a strategy that is employed by some providers.]

 

Some Potential Legal Risks of a Non-Participation Strategy

 

Some states have made it illegal to waive patient’s deductibles and copayments for commercial health insurance plans.[4] In addition, the physician using such a strategy may face potential statutory risks to his/her ability to practice medicine.[5] Federal legislation may also be applicable.[6] Even if there are no state statutes that make the waiver of copayments and deductibles illegal, the physician may be subject to civil claims made by the insurance carrier if copayments and deductible are routinely waived to induce patients.  Prior to pursuing an out-of-network strategy which involves the waiver of copayments and deductibles, the private practice should consult with an attorney.  An attorney will be able to provide guidance to inform the practice of any statutes or case law in the jurisdiction.  Case law will determine if there has been any precedent set by prior lawsuits dealing with the same or similar subject matter.  That is, if an insurance company has prevailed against a provider in the practice’s jurisdiction for engaging in such practices, there may be some likelihood that another suit could be met with similar results.  Of course, each case is fact and circumstance specific, which drives the outcome.  It is unlikely that an insurance carrier would prevail in a suit for breach of contract.  As a non-participating provider, there is no contract to breach.  However, fraud and contractual interference are other civil claims which could be raised.  Consider these cases:

 

In New Jersey, an ambulatory surgery center terminated its participation with Horizon Blue Cross.[7] Thereafter, the surgery center continued to provide services to Horizon subscribers, but on an out-of-network basis.  Forms within the clinic stated “This facility will accept usual and customary payment as full assignment. We will honor your members in-network deductible and waive the co-insurance.”  Subsequently, Horizon sued the provider for fraudulent submission of claims forms in violation of the New Jersey Insurance Fraud Prevention Act.[8] The insurer also sued for negligent misrepresentation and tortious interference with the insurer’s in-network provider contracts.[9] For procedural reasons, the case was sent back to state court, and the disposition of the case is unknown at the time of this article.  Nevertheless, the provider was exposed to legal expenses in defending the suit.

 

In another New Jersey case, Aetna filed a complaint against a chiropractor alleging insurance fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and tortious interference with Aetna’s subscriber contracts.[10] Aetna alleged that the chiropractor waived the patients’ co-insurance and failed to disclose that waiver to Aetna.  Specifically, Aetna pointed to the 1500 claim form, which contains the fields “amount paid” (Box 29) and “balance due” (Box 30).  Because the chiropractor left these fields blank, Aetna alleged that the chiropractor made false claims and misrepresentations.  Aetna claimed that they relied on the chiropractor’s misrepresentations and paid additional money to which the chiropractor was not entitled.  In their complaint, Aetna sought damages because the chiropractor circumvented the health plan’s out-of-network provisions.  “[These] provisions were designed to deter patients from using non-participating providers and from receiving unnecessary or excessive treatment, and [the chiropractor’s] waiver of these payments caused patients to over-utilize his services.”[11] The chiropractor attempted to have Aetna’s claim dismissed.  Aetna prevailed and was able to proceed against the chiropractor on the claim of tortious interference with a business relationship.

 

Conclusion

 

There are legal and ethical considerations in play when a physician practice engages in an out-of-network strategy.  Among the ethical considerations is the responsibility to inform the patient that the clinic is out-of-network/non-participating.  Perhaps more complicated, is whether the provider has a duty to inform the patient that the services are less expensive for the patient using an in-network provider.  Every state has its own statutes and insurance regulations.  The state in which the physician practices may have a statute that prohibits copayment and deductible waivers.  Case law may also establish precedent in your jurisdiction regarding this practice.  The provider should consult an attorney for a full examination of the legal ramifications of engaging in such a strategy.

 

Few Players in Health Insurance Markets

MarketWatch, February 1, 2011

 

Health insurers are consolidating their market power throughout the nation as nearly two-thirds of U.S. cities are dominated by two carriers and nearly half of all metro areas are controlled by one, a study released Tuesday finds.

 

In its annual examination of the potential for monopolies among health insurers, the American Medical Association contends that in 60% of the nation’s 359 largest metro areas, the two largest health insurers had a combined market share of 70% or more.

 

The study also finds that in 48% of cities, one insurer had a market share of 50% or more. AMA’s examination also finds that virtually all — 99% — of health insurance markets in the U.S. are “highly concentrated” according to Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission guidelines.

 

“The market power of health insurers places physicians and patients at a significant disadvantage,” Dr. Cecil B. Wilson, the AMA’s president, said in a press release. “When insurers dominate a market, people pay higher health insurance premiums than they should, and physicians are pressured to accept unfair contract terms and corporate policies, which undermines the physician role as patient advocate.”

 

The study, however, has often become a bone of contention for America’s Health Insurance Plans, the trade group that represents managed-care plans and health carriers.

 

Speaking just before the study was available, AHIP President Karen Ignagni said that a variety of health coverage is more widely available than AMA studies in the past have contended. She adds the examinations “cherry pick” data to paint a monopolistic picture but often doesn’t include figures from self-insured employers, which can comprise more than half the market.

 

“In the past, the data have been seriously flawed,” Ignagni said.

 

The AMA counters, however, that the lion’s share of the self-insured are included under the portion of the preferred-provider study. Only HMO members who are self-insured are not included, the AMA says.

 

AHIP officials also point out that one state highlighted for its heavily concentrated market, Alabama, has some of the lowest insurance rates in the nation.

 

The AMA study shows that 93% of the state’s combined preferred-provider and health maintenance organization market is controlled by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama.

The New Doctor in the House: Consolidation

 

Patients -- and investors -- should benefit as big drug makers buy out small ones with better pipelines.

 

Other states where a single insurer controls at least half the market include Alaska, Arkansas, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts and Michigan.

 

There’s also Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and Virginia.

 

The study didn’t examine four states, including North Dakota, which at last check was found to have its Blue Cross Blue Shield in control of more than 90% of the market.

 

But the paper did find that in 24 states, the two largest insurers had combined share of 70% or more. Growing more consolidated were markets in Florida, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Tennessee.

 

The AMA points out that figures from 2008 show that the health insurance market is getting more consolidated on every front.

 

In its 2008 examination, the AMA found that the two top insurers held a combined share of 70% or more in 53% of the markets. It also says the earlier study showed a single insurer with a majority market share in 44% of the cities and that the two largest insurers held a combined 70% share in 18 states.

 

Physician Cost Profiling Reviewed: Bad Information: Inexpensive Doctors May Not Save Money

Managed Care Information Center, January 25, 2011

 

Insurance plans encouraging patients to receive care from physicians who keep medical costs lower are based on unreliable information, according to a new RAND Corp. study. Notably, estimates of doctor performance may not achieve the intended savings.

 

The first major assessment of physician cost profiling found that about one-fourth of the 13,788 physicians studied would be misclassified under the system of cost ranking commonly used by insurance plans, according to the RAND findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

 

Health purchasers have focused cost-saving efforts on physicians because they write the orders that can drive increased healthcare spending. Health plans are limiting the number of physicians who receive in-network contracts, offering patients lower co-payments to see preferred doctors and paying bonuses to doctors who keep spending down.

 

"Our findings raise questions about the utility of cost profiling tools for high-stakes activities such as tiered health plans and the likelihood that wide use of these strategies will reduce healthcare spending," said John L. Adams, the study’s lead author and a senior statistician at RAND. "Consumers, physicians and those who pay for health care are all at risk of being misled by the results from these tools."

 

RAND analyzed insurance claims information for 2004 and 2005 from four Massachusetts health plans that covered about 80 percent of the non-elderly with private insurance. It used commercially available software to examine the costs of treating episodes of common illnesses such as diabetes and heart attack, assigning each episode of care to a physician and creating a cost profile for each physician based on all similar episodes of care.

 

Studying 28 physician specialties in detail, researchers found that only about 40 percent of physicians had cost profile scores that were at least 70 percent reliable – a common threshold for reliability –and fewer than 10 percent of physicians had cost profiles that were at least 90 percent reliable.

 

Reliability of Physician Cost Studies

 

Among physicians in a hypothetical two-tiered insurance plan, nearly 40 percent of internists and nearly two-thirds of vascular surgeons labeled as lower cost were not lower cost, according to the RAND study. Physicians in surgical specialties, in particular, appear to have low reliability cost profile scores, while dermatologists’ cost profile scores were the most reliable.

 

Funding for the study was provided by the U.S. Department of Labor.

 

Using statistical tools, researchers evaluated the reliability of physician cost scores by considering factors such as the number and types of patients physicians treated. The results show that the reliability of cost-profiling scores was unacceptably low for physicians in most of the specialty groups.

 

Researchers also examined how reliability scores might change across several different scenarios, suchas requiring at least 30 episodes of treatment to create a profile and different methods for assigning episodes to physicians. While some scenarios modestly increased reliability, the results still fell short, according to the study.

 

"These ranking systems may be useful for some purposes, but they are not reliable enough at this point to make decisions about encouraging patients to see certain providers or excluding some doctors from insurance networks," Adams said.

 

He said the current systems may be useful for efforts such as warning physicians that their treatment methods appear to cost more than those used by their peers and urging them to reexamine their practice styles.

 

While cost profiling shows promise as a strategy to reduce health costs, it cannot be successful until more robust tools are developed to use claims data and other information to create reliable cost profiles for physicians.

Questions Mount As Health Law Rolls Out

NPR, January 19, 2011

 

Confused about the new health law? You’re not alone. Over the past couple of weeks, All Things Considered asked listeners to e-mail questions. On Wednesday's show, I tackled some on the air. Here they are, with a few bonus questions and answers that weren't broadcast.

 

One question, by far the most common query, accounted for nearly half the e-mails we received. And for a hint, consider that the name of the Republican bill, H.R 2, is "Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act."

 

Q: How accurate is the Republican mantra that the new law kills jobs?

 

A: According to the Republicans, the job toll is about 650,000. But that statistic — which the GOP says comes from the Congressional Budget Office — has been pretty thoroughly debunked, among others by the group factcheck.org.

 

It turns out that what the CBO actually said about job loss is that the law would allow people to stop working because they could get health insurance — not prompt employers to cut jobs or fire people.

 

Now there are estimates that some low-wage jobs would be lost. But the CBO also said the impact would be very small — and that's something most other analysts agree with.

 

Dane Schumacher, of Huntsville, Ark., is full-time farmer who says he lives off the proceeds from farming and earns less than $15,000 a year. He's concerned about what the law may make him do.

 

Q: Will I be required to purchase health insurance? If so, how in the world does the government expect me to afford to do so?

 

A: In a word, no. People who earn less than 133 percent of the poverty line (about $14,400 in 2010; soon to be updated for 2011) will get Medicaid coverage, which costs them nothing. That's a big change. Before the law, qualifying for Medicaid meant you had to be poor and belong to another specific group, such as single mothers or the blind. Now you’ll just have to have a low income.

 

But there are other exceptions to the insurance requirement. You also won’t have to buy insurance if your income is too low to owe federal taxes (which is about $10,000 this year for an individual; about $18,000 for a couple) or if the lowest-cost plan costs more than 8 percent of your income.

 

Steve Rosenbaum asks from San Rafael, Calif., about what will happen to privately administered Medicare plans.

 

Q: What will be the situation when the new health care law ends Medicare Senior Advantage? Will the law require my HMO to continue my coverage/membership and provide a Medicare supplemental program at a reasonable cost?

 

A: First, the law doesn't end Medicare Advantage. That's a myth. It does reduce substantial subsidies the Republican Congress added to the program as part of the 2003 Medicare prescription drug law. Those were supposed to get more seniors to leave the traditional Medicare program and join privately managed care and other types of health plans.

 

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission found in 2009 those plans were getting 14 percent more per beneficiary than it actually cost to provide Medicare's basic benefits.

 

Now it's true that the last time Congress cut subsidies to private Medicare plans, back in 1997, many of them left the market, and beneficiaries were upset. But this time the cuts are going to be much more gradual and are much less dramatic, and most analysts predict that the vast majority of beneficiaries will still have access to an affordable plan.

 

Dave Manley of Boston wonders why the law is taking so long to kick in.

 

Q: Why does most of the current law not go into effect for several years? If the purpose of the bill is to expand and improve health care in the U.S. and reduce its cost, why the multiyear rollout?

 

A: Two reasons. One, as Republicans are fond of reminding everyone, is that it does help with budgeting to push some of the costs outside the 10-year window the Congressional Budget Office uses to analyze budgets. Republicans did the same thing when they passed the Medicare prescription drug bill in 2003.

 

But the there's a more nuts-and-bolts reason, too. And that is that the health system is like a huge ocean liner that takes a long time to move in a different direction. There's a lot of planning and details to be worked out and changes that need to be made at every level of government and by employers and workers alike. So it really legitimately does take a couple of years to get things up and running. That was true for the Medicare law, too, by the way, which passed in 2003 but didn’t start until 2006.

 

Now could they have made most of this health law operational Jan. 1, 2013, rather than 2014? Probably. Could they have made it start Jan. 1, 2012? Probably not.

 

Theresa Stahlman-West of Los Angeles asked about the potential penalties for companies that don't comply with the new law.

 

Q: A friend of mine works for a law firm in New York City. The owners of the law firm said that when the new health care law takes effect, they will just refuse to provide health insurance for their employees and accept the government's fine for not providing it. They said this will be cheaper than actually providing the required health insurance. If this is true, wouldn't all companies do this? What is there in the law to prevent companies from blatantly refusing to provide health insurance for their employees? How will these employees of the law firm obtain health insurance if their company refuses to provide it?"

 

A: First, of all, let's get straight what's required and what isn't. There's no employer mandate in the law. For employers with fewer than 50 workers, there's no requirement — period. For those with fewer than 25 workers, there’s actually a tax credit to help them pay for coverage for their workers. But for those with more than 50 employees, there is a potential penalty. That would kick in if they don't offer coverage and have workers who go into these new health insurance exchanges they have incomes low enough to qualify for government subsidies. Those penalties are $2,000 per worker. And some companies may well do that.

 

But if they do, those workers will be able to get coverage in the new exchanges, so they won't be left high and dry. Plus, most businesses will still offer coverage as a way to recruit and retain workers, according to several surveys done of business executives. And, in Massachusetts, which already has a mandate for individuals, employer coverage has actually gone up since it was implemented, not down.

 

Here's one from Marita Eddy of Silver Spring, Md.

 

Q: What are the new rules regarding Flexible Spending Accounts and Medical Savings Accounts?

 

A: For those of you who are unfamiliar with these, they are various types of savings accounts from which you can pay medical bills that aren’t covered by your health insurance. The main new rule this year is that as of Jan. 1, you can no longer be reimbursed for over-the-counter medications in either your FSA or your Health Savings Account (Medical Savings Accounts have actually been phased out) unless you get a doctor to write you a prescription for them.

 

Starting in 2013, there's another change, at least for the Flexible Spending Accounts — you’ll be limited to putting away just $2,500 a year tax-free. Previously employers set the limit for how much you could shelter.

 

Both changes are not for policy reasons, but to help pay for the rest of the health law.

 

Mark Sandifer from Seattle asked about the profits of insurance companies in various parts of the world.

 

Q: I've read that the return on investment for health insurance companies averages around 16 percent. How does that compare with other countries?

 

Private insurance — particularly for-profit private insurance — isn't all that common in other countries other than as a supplement or complement to public health insurance. For example, in Switzerland, which has a system similar to the one that’s envisioned in the new health law, where everyone will have to purchase private insurance, all the companies are required by law to be not-for-profit in the sale of the basic benefit package. In the Netherlands, which has a similar system, although it also has public plans, there are for-profit health plans, but they generally have profit margins of about 5 percent.

 

GOP push for repeal could deny Rep. Giffords coverage

Fierce Health Finance, January 19, 2011

 

If, understandably, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.) decided after her recovery to leave Congress for the less-visible private sector (before she ran for office, she was the third generation to run the family tire business) and decided to start her own venture, repeal would make it virtually impossible for her to obtain health insurance. No carrier would insure someone with the pre-existing condition of a traumatic brain injury. The Patient Protection Act eliminated such discriminatory practices.

 

If the House was actually run like a small business with 435 employees, its human resources manager would get a rude shock: the premiums it paid for healthcare coverage would skyrocket due to the cost of Giffords' treatment (in reality, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program is community rated, but many private sector plans are not). The business might have to start cost-shifting to its employees to make up the difference, or drop coverage altogether. The tax subsidies offered by the Patient Protection Act makes such unpleasant choices far more palatable to navigate.

 

The Patient Protection Act isn't perfect, but it will expand coverage to 30 million Americans who currently have no insurance at all, whose physical devastation would be joined with financial ruin should some random madman shoot them in the head. And I could go on and on about how reform would actually assist the House's most gravely wounded member. But why should I?

 

The GOP's continued press to repeal reform after the Tucson bloodbath and its outrageously named resolution ("Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act") was a Joseph Welch moment, the time for someone in a position of power and respect to ask, "At long last, have you left no sense of decency?" But so far no one has.

 

Such a question is going to be left to the voters in 2012, who hopefully will kill some jobs on their own: those held by the politicians who don't see a hole in their colleague's head as a wound to be healed at all costs, but an unpleasant distraction to be sidestepped as surely as a puddle on the sidewalk.

 

11 Hot Healthcare Buzzwords for 2011

HealthLeaders Media , January 6, 2011

 

With rapid changes in healthcare comes a new vocabulary with terms and phrases every provider should know.

 

Culled from journal articles, conferences, blogs and other media, some of these phrases might not be all that new. But it's our bet that even if you've heard some of them before, you're going to hear a lot more references to them in 2011.

 

1. EHR-EMR-HIT Interoperability. These acronyms are among the most important to know and understand. The concept is that EHR (electronic health records), EMR (electronic medical records), and HIT (health information technology) use technology to connect providers' and patients' data and communication online. EMR and EHR are sometimes used interchangeably but they are distinct.

 

EHR is a complete, long-term computerized electronic record of a patient's care culled from any and all provider settings while the EMR is the electronic replacement of a paper chart and the record of a patient's history and care generated by one particular provider.

 

An EHR, also connects multiple providers, such as hospitals and clinicians, laboratories, and prescription and/or pharmacy histories, test results, and care notes for a particular patient.

 

Also see Meaningful Use, the phrase whose definition is specified in federal regulations governing dispersal of stimulus refunds and credits to providers who achieve it with their electronic record systems.

 

2. Creative Destruction. The oxymoronic phrase that's derived from economic theory refers to the healthcare idea that in order to create a new healthcare system, we will have to tear down the old one, as referenced in a Nov. 11 article about accountable care organizations in the New England Journal of Medicine by Robert Kocher, MD, and Nikhil R. Sahni of the McKinsey Center for U.S. Health System Reform and the Engleberg Center for Health Care Reform.

 

Kocher and Sahni say that under the healthcare reform legislation "the next few years will be a period of what economists call “creative destruction”: our fragmented, fee-for-service health care delivery system will be transformed into a higher-quality, higher-productivity system with strong incentives for efficient, coordinated care.”

 

3. HAIs --- Getting to Zero. This phrase also is not new to the lingo, but it is destined to become a hallway mantra in 2011, as healthcare-associated infections are about to be factored into how much hospitals receive in their reimbursement. Hospital-acquired infections are a leading cause of death, added cost, increased morbidity and length of stay. And they are often quite preventable.

 

4. Teachback. Because patients are sick, sleep-deprived, stressed, tired, distracted and confused, they don't understand much about what they're being told during their healthcare experience. That's why providers are increasingly being re-trained to take a lot more time to make sure patients and/or their authorized significant others and caregivers understand what they need to know to continue their recovery.

 

In many hospital and clinical settings, patients are being asked to repeat back what has been said to them to make sure they understand it, or "teach it back" to the provider. Patients are being given written instructions and asked to read those back too. A nod of the head is not okay.

 

5. Pink Fatigue or Pinkification. The plethora of pink – in commercialized products, quasi-athletic events, advertising, pink product placement – may result in overkill and a trivialization of the search for better treatment or a cure for breast cancer.

 

Some bloggers have rightfully asked whether pink buckets of Kentucky Fried Chicken really send the right message. Pinkathon publicity campaigns also may tend to minimize the sometimes equally significant risks of obesity and heart disease these same patients.

 

6. Sat Scores. We're not talking about tests that measure scholastic aptitude. Increasingly heard in hospital hallways, clinic and physician waiting rooms, and even emergency departments---is whether the patient will give a positive answer when he or she is asked if the healthcare experience was satisfying. Providers soon will receive federal payments based on whether their satisfaction 'sat' scores were better than their competitors'.

 

Look for modifications to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey that ask even more detailed questions about length of wait times, and whether patients feel their care was well explained. Also anticipate better utilization of volunteers (think Walmart greeters) to ask if waiting patients would like something to read or drink, and improved access to entertainment or the web (movies, TV and internet access) to ease patients' anxiety while they are in a healthcare setting.

 

7. Alignment. This word means many things to many people, but in this context we're talking about standardization of equipment, procedures and supply purchases, programs, and policies.

 

Alignment can be considered a fighting word, because hospital systems with multiple facilities and autonomous programs that cater to individual physician or administrator preferences may balk at the imposition of limits. But systems that are steering full steam toward these goals believe that they will be the ones to succeed.

 

8. Respectful Crisis Management. Sometimes, providers make very big mistakes. But how healthcare systems respond to these unfortunate events can determine whether the next mistake is prevented, or whether it embitters staff, family, the public and the community in a toxic cloud of mistrust and blame.

 

This term actually represents a growing area of scientific research to find the best management strategies that provide productive responses to a critical healthcare error. Responses that unify the team to acknowledge and mitigate harm and prevent a similar mistake from occurring are the ones to adopt. No one benefits if those who made the mistake are so afraid, they won't dare explain what factors contributed to their making it.

 

9. Checklists, Checklists. Look for increasing agreement that these strategies – step-by-step protocols for catheter insertion or time-outs and counts in surgical procedures to prevent adverse events and infections. While there is some objection from providers who say that checklists' success are primarily attributable to a "Hawthorne" effect, (which holds that people perform better when they know they are being watched), don't expect those naysayers to block this trend.

 

10. Medical Apps. Whether it's on an iPhone, iPad or other mobile device, look for healthcare to be informed and prescribed, delivered, and monitored by doctors and patients using mobile apps. It might sound trivial to joke that "The App will see you now," but increasingly patients will use these devices to check and transmit their glucose levels, and physicians will use them to detect and treat abnormalities.

 

11. Medical Loss Ratio.

Affordable Care Act, insurance companies are now required to spend no more than 15% to 20% on administrative expenses such as executive salaries, overhead, and marketing, and the rest must be spent on patient care and/or quality improvement. Moreover, they must be transparent about how they spend their money. The act covers plans that insure nearly 75 million insured Americans.

 

Effort To Reward Medicare Advantage Plans Draws Criticism

Kaiser Health News, January 10, 2011

 

Lake Wobegon has come to Medicare – and a key advisory panel doesn't like it.

 

The panel, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPac), in a Jan. 6 letter does not mention the fictional Lake Wobegon, where all the children are above average. But it hints that not every Medicare Advantage insurer deserves to be above average.

 

The letter, to Dr. Donald Berwick, who heads the agency overseeing Medicare, criticizes a move to extend quality bonus payments meant for top-performing health insurers to those with lower scores. In fact, the new bonus program will reward even those plans highlighted on Medicare's own website as being poor performers over three consecutive years, according to the letter signed by MedPac Chairman Glenn Hackbarth.

 

The effort by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will likely result in "far greater program costs" than the reward system called for by Congress in the health law and reduces insurers' incentive to achieve high performance, the letter concludes.

 

Medicare Advantage plans are those offered by private insurers as an alternative to traditional Medicare. About 11 million people – or 24 percent of all Medicare beneficiaries – are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans nationwide.

 

The comments are included in a letter concerning a separate change in Medicare and come in response to a move made by CMS officials late last year to adjust the standard that Medicare Advantage insurers must meet in order to qualify for a bonus payment. The change – made by CMS officials using their authority to create demonstration projects – "increases program spending at a time when Medicare already faces serious problems with cost control and long-term financing," says the letter.

 

The health care law cut $136 billion over 10 years from the Medicare Advantage program, following years of concern that the private sector plans cost the government more than traditional Medicare.

 

But the law also called for bonuses starting next year for insurers who score at least four out of five "stars" on a set of quality measurements.

 

However, under the three-year demonstration that includes all insurers nationwide, Medicare will extend those bonus payments to plans that score at least three stars.

 

Based on Medicare's 2010 star ratings, the change means 62 percent of all Medicare Advantage insurers -- representing 84 percent of enrollees -- will qualify for the quality bonuses, compared with only 14 percent of plans under the health law provisions.

 

Medicare officials have said that extending the quality bonuses to more plans -- along with another change that speeds up some of the payments – is meant to spur managed-care plans to move more quickly to improve quality. The total cost over the three years is $1.3 billion, Medicare officials said in November.

 

CMS spokesman Peter Ashkenaz said the agency could not comment on the MedPac concerns because they came as part of public comments gathered on a separate proposal. The agency will respond to comments, including those from MedPac, in the final regulations, he says. It isn't clear if those responses will include discussion of MedPac’s criticism of the bonus program, however, because it is a demonstration project that does not require a final regulation.

 

The star rating system was established a few years ago to help Medicare officials monitor plans and to guide consumers in choosing coverage, although some advocates say the measurements don't go far enough. Insurers are rated based on dozens of measures, including the percentage of members who get certain vaccinations, how well they monitor diabetics and the percentage of complaints filed by members.

 

Still, the way the demonstration program is designed would allow nine plans that have been rated as poor performers over three consecutive years to quality for the quality bonuses, the MedPac letter says.

 

In making the move, the agency is employing an "overly broad" use of its authority to create demonstration programs, which are generally smaller pilot projects testing innovations in how health care is delivered, the letter says.

 

"Demonstrations should not be used as a mechanism to increase payments," says the MedPac letter, which concludes by urging CMS to reconsider its decision.

 

Health Debate Delayed, Toned Down

Politico, January 9, 2011

 

Lawmakers on Sunday said they still expect to have a spirited but delayed and toned-down debate to repeal the health care reform law after Saturday’s shooting in Arizona.

 

Within hours of the massacre, Majority Leader Eric Cantor postponed the House’s entire legislative agenda for the week, including the vote on repealing the law, which was planned for Wednesday. His office said he’ll make further announcements on the schedule today.

 

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Republican conference chairman, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that the rhetoric needs to be turned down.

 

“We ought to cool it, tone it down, treat each other with great respect, respect each other’s ideas, and even on difficult issues like immigration or taxes or the health care law, do our best not to inflame passions.”

 

Republicans said Sunday that repealing health reform is still a priority, but not the focus in Congress next week.

 

“In light of yesterday’s tragedy, our focus has changed, the focus of Congress, as well as the focus of millions of Americans all across this country,” Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), said on “Fox News Sunday.” “And we need to make sure that we are responding appropriately to that tragedy before we get involved in the legislative business of Congress.”

 

Both opponents and supporters of health reform had scheduled numerous events next week to make their case to lawmakers and the American public about health reform. Organizing for America and leaders of the Energy and Commerce Committee have both cancelled events next week where they were set to attack the Republican repeal effort.

 

The year-long debate over the health reform law heightened political rhetoric and incited some violence. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’s district office was one of several congressional offices vandalized last year.

 

Republicans on Sunday reiterated their campaign promise to repeal the law.

 

“We believe that that the bill needs to be repealed and replaced with a much better approach to ensuring that we have quality and affordable health care in this country. And that continues to be a high priority for the House Republicans and the new majority,” McMorris Rodgers said. “We’re just going to wait and make sure that we’re responding appropriately to the current situation.”

 

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), ranking member of the Budget Committee, said he hopes respect will reign in the next phase of the health reform debate.

 

“I think that we’re obviously going to have a spirited debate. There are strong feelings on both sides,” Van Hollen said on ABC’s “This Week.” “But I hope that, in that process, people will reflect on the tone of the debate and be respectful of differences in opinion going forward.”

 

“The question is, how can you have that debate without somehow crossing a line in a way that can lead to super- charged rhetoric that could have unintended consequences?” he said.

 

Even if the rhetoric does cool, the reality of health reform isn’t likely to change. Alexander said he expected “almost all or all” Senate Republicans to fully support repealing the law.

 

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the majority whip, appeared with Alexander on Candy Crowley’s CNN broadcast. Durbin said Senate Democrats will block repeal efforts. “At this point, I can tell you, having spoken to the Democratic Caucus, there [is] solid support within that caucus for maintaining the president’s health care bill,” Durbin said on “State of the Union.”

 

But Durbin said Democrats are open to making improvements to the law, such as repealing the 1099 tax reporting requirements.

 

“The only perfect law I know of was carried on stone tablets down a mountain by Senator Moses. All the other efforts that have been made… have been subject to review and should be, and I’m open to that conversation. But I don’t believe repeal has any legs in the Senate at this point.”

 

Insurance premium hikes to face heightened federal scrutiny

Amadnews, January 3, 2011

 

HHS won't have the power to block "unreasonable" increases, but it plans to work with states to ensure they have the resources to stop them.

 

Washington -- The Obama administration has proposed that some individual and small-group insurers seeking to increase plan premiums by 10% or more starting in 2011 must disclose publicly the justification for doing so and possibly face intervention from state insurance regulators.

 

Under a proposed rule issued Dec. 21, the Dept. of Health and Human Services will not have enforcement authority to prevent insurance premium increases even if they are deemed "unreasonable" after a federal or state review. However, the department plans to work with state insurance agencies to ensure that they have the resources to highlight excessive premium hikes and nullify them when allowed by state law.

 

"The proposed rate review policy will empower consumers, promote competition, encourage insurers to do more to control health care costs and discourage insurers from charging premiums which are unjustified," said Jay Angoff, director of the HHS Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.

 

At the very least, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said, the requirement for public disclosure by insurers could prompt them to alter their plans when the proposed increases are considered unreasonable.

 

"Most consumers are operating entirely in the dark, and this is a very bright light," she said.

 

If the proposed rule is finalized this year, states with effective rate review systems of their own would conduct the investigations into questionable premium increases. The department said this system has proved effective. For example, Connecticut regulators recently blocked an insurer's proposed 20% rate increase after their review found it excessive.

 

For states that lack the authority or the resources to carry out such investigations, HHS would conduct its own review and publicize the results. The department noted that states will be eligible for funding through the national health reform law to begin closer scrutiny of insurer activity.

 

New mandate

 

The new proposed regulation is the result of a mandate in the health reform law. Several high-profile attempts by insurers to raise individual and small-group premiums by double-digit percentages in recent years gained national attention and prompted some lawmakers to seek tighter regulation of the market.

 

However, not every health insurance premium filing will be subject to review. Thousands of existing plans will be grandfathered in under the reform law because they were operating when the legislation was enacted.

 

The American Medical Association and other members of organized medicine that backed the health reform law also support taking a harder look at premium hikes.

 

The American Medical Association "is optimistic that the new regulation on health insurance rates will lead to greater transparency of the insurance industry," said AMA President Cecil B. Wilson, MD. "We will continue to review the regulation and work with HHS to ensure it benefits patients and physicians."

 

Patient advocacy organizations hailed the proposed rules and called on the federal government to enforce them aggressively. "No longer will the insurance industry be able to operate in a Wild, Wild West through unreasonable premium increases without any accountability for their actions," said Ron Pollack, Families USA's executive director.

 

But Karen Ignagni, president and CEO of America's Health Insurance Plans, said the focus on premium increases ignores the cost drivers behind them, including "soaring medical prices, new benefit mandates and changes to health plans' risk pools." She said the federal government investigating premium changes based on an arbitrary threshold of reasonableness would not reveal the full picture.

 

"We agree that states are best suited to review premiums because they have the experience, infrastructure and local market knowledge needed to ensure that consumers are protected and health plans are solvent," Ignagni said. "The federal government is not in position to make these assessments."

 

Sebelius said a proposed premium increase exceeding 10% -- a figure that could change in future years -- will not necessarily be deemed excessive once underlying factors are taken into account. A double-digit hike, for instance, would not be considered the same way for a small insurer operating on a thin profit margin as it would for a more profitable health plan that increased premiums significantly several times in recent years. As HHS learns more through its investigations, the conditions required to indicate an unreasonable rate increase will become more nuanced based on individual states' circumstances, she said.

 

Christopher Koller, Rhode Island's health insurance commissioner, said at the unveiling of the proposed rule that the appropriate balance would need to be struck to ensure fairness for insurers and consumers alike. If one side thinks the regulation is too strict and the other considers it too lenient, "you've probably hit it in the right place," he said.

 

The most recent proposed regulation, which could be finalized within months, is the latest in a string of rules tightening scrutiny of health insurance practices under the health reform law. One such recent rule on medical-loss ratios stipulated that insurers will need to spend at least 80% to 85% of plan premiums on actual medical care and quality improvement.

 

PPACA: Rules Could Trigger 773 Rate Reviews per Year

 National Underwriter, December 23, 2010

 

Proposed federal health insurance rate review regulations could lead to reviews of about 40% of the increase requests in the small group market and 60% of the requests in the individual market.

 

Officials at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have given those estimates in a discussion of the possible impact of a proposed rate increase disclosure and review rule.

 

The  proposed rate review rule, which was released earlier this week, would implement PPACA provisions in the Affordable Care Act that would require the federal government to work with states to promote vigorous health insurance rate review programs.

 

The Affordable Care Act is the legislative package that includes the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

 

HHS officials are proposing that state or federal regulators should review requests for rate hikes greater than 10% for non-grandfathered individual and small  group coverage, and they have suggested that regulators could end up adding reviews of requests for large-group rate hikes.

 

The HHS officials who conducted the impact analysis used data from the System for Electronic Rate and Form Filing, a service provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo., to come up with an estimate that carriers will file a total of 3,635 to 4,015 individual and small group rate filings this year.

 

Rate justification requirements could increase the number of individual and small group filings to 4,858 to 5,828 in 2011, officials say.

 

About 33% to 60% of the individual policies and 58% to 80% of the small group policies probably will grandfathered, but, if recent trends continue, the number of non-grandfathered filings seeking rate hikes greater than 10% could range from 221 to 650 in the individual market and from 150 to 746 in the small-group market, officials say.

 

The total number of filings subject to review could range from 371 to 1,396, with a mid-range value of 773, officials report.

 

If that mid-range figure is correct, the total insurer startup-year cost of reporting rate data to regulators, keeping relevant records, and posting rate hike request information on the Web could be about $14 million, or about $18,000 per report and $34,000 per issuer, officials estimate.

 

Officials are estimating each report would take 125 to 175 hours to complete, at a cost of about $200 per hour. HHS officials say hourly rates seem to range from $80 to $120 for actuaries' administrative support staffers; $120 to $180 for actuarial analysts; $200 to $275 for support actuaries; and $340 to $360 for principal actuaries.

 

Once the rate review system was up and running, total insurer annual costs could be $400,000 to $4.5 million, officials say.

 

The Council for Affordable Health Insurance (CAHI), Alexandria, Va., a group that opposes government efforts to increase control over the health insurance market, says HHS officials seem to be ignoring the impact of the rate review requirement and other Affordable Care Act mandates on insurers' ability and willingness to provide coverage.

 

Given the effects of all of the new mandates on coverage costs, "setting arbitrary rate limits will threaten the availability of health insurance," CAHI says.

 

New Rules Would Require Insurers To Justify Double-Digit Rate Increases

Kaiser Health News, December 21, 2010

 

Health insurers seeking a rate increase of 10 percent or more in 2011 must publicly detail why the increase is needed, under proposed rules released by the Obama administration Tuesday.

 

Under the proposal, the flagged premium increases would be subject to review by the states – or the federal government in some cases – to determine if they are unreasonable.

 

In following years, the Department of Health and Human Services will adjust the specific percentage threshold for each individual state. Thresholds would vary partly because medical costs vary by state.

 

The proposed rules, which would affect insurance policies sold to individuals and small businesses but not large employers, result from the new health care law. Administration officials repeatedly criticized insurers for raising rates excessively during and after the long debate leading up to passage of the law in March.

 

Evidence "suggests that the majority of increases in the individual market have exceeded 10 percent each year for the past three years," significantly exceeding some national measures of cost inflation, according to the proposal.

 

While consumers may see any large increase as unjust, the government proposal says it is not possible to know whether an increase is unreasonable until its underlying assumptions are analyzed.

 

Final rules could be issued in about six months, after a public comment period. They would affect rate increases filed or effective after July 1, 2011.

 

America's Health Insurance Plans, the industry lobby, says rising premiums are caused by a variety of factors, including rapidly increasing medical costs. The regulation considers some of those costs, the group says, but doesn't adequately factor in new benefit mandates and the recession, which is causing younger and healthier people to drop coverage, leaving fewer premium dollars to cover a pool of relatively older or sicker policyholders.

 

"For example, data from the state of Oregon show that prices of many medical services have increased at an average annual rate exceeding 10 percent," says AHIP CEO Karen Ignagni. "California data show that prices for a hospital stay increased by more than 150 percent between 2000 and 2009—an average annual growth rate of 11 percent. Trends likes these are being seen across the country."

 

Some consumer advocates say the proposed regulation doesn't go far enough. The proposal, for example, gives states discretion on revealing some of the detailed data provided by insurers. States could reveal simpler summaries of the data.

 

"The whole point of this regulation, as the HHS secretary has said, is to shine a light on the actuarial assumptions … in the hope that public scrutiny will shame insurers into doing the right thing," says Carmen Balber, director of Consumer Watchdog's Washington office. "If full data is not disclosed, in many cases we're left with the status quo."

 

The health care law requires review and justification for increases deemed unreasonable, but does not give the federal government authority to reject rate increases. Federal officials hope public disclosure will discourage unnecessarily large rate increases, encourage state regulators to take a closer look and help individuals and businesses make wise choices. State officials can also bar insurers with a pattern of unreasonable increases from selling their products in new marketplaces, called exchanges, which are set to open in 2014.

 

State regulation of premiums varies widely. Some states review proposed rate changes and can deny increases before they go into effect; others allow insurers to put new rates into effect and examine them only if questions are raised.

 

HHS says it will look at several factors in determining whether rates are unreasonable, including whether an insurer meets a requirement that it spend at least 80 percent of its revenue on medical costs and whether it produces substantial evidence for the increase.

 

Insurers would have to post on their websites proposed increases above the thresholds and if the rates ultimately are deemed unreasonable they'd have to post that fact as well, in addition to explaining reasons for the increases. Insurers would need to publicly detail what they are spending on medical care, expected future claims costs and administrative spending, including executive compensation.

 

States would do their own rate reviews unless HHS determines they don't have an effective system. Among other things, states must show they collect data sufficient to determine whether a rate increase is unreasonable and review that data effectively, the proposal says.

 

Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have already accepted about $1 million each in grants to help them bolster their ability to review rate increases. HHS officials said a substantial majority of states already have effective rate review.

 

Top 10 Health Benefits Trends of 2010

Associated Press, December 20, 2010

 

1. Healthcare Reform. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) shook the health care world this year, causing companies to revisit their benefits strategies to determine efficient ways of becoming compliant with the reform's immediate and long-term requirements. Chief among their considerations was whether plans could be grandfathered and how to best explain the changes to an anxious workforce in light of new communication and reporting responsibilities. On the upside, companies began to explore new benefit design opportunities by becoming engaged in financial modeling and benefit strategy development as they prepared for the many changes that will go into effect from now until 2014.

 

2. Cost Sharing and Rewarding Healthy Lifestyles. Employee benefit contribution structures held steady over the past decade -- even during the height of the recession, when companies froze wages and cut other expenses to prevent layoffs. This year's rise in salaries, however slight, combined with premiums that jumped 12 to 15 percent, saw companies sharing health care's financial burden with employees. Covered workers contributed on average two to three percent more for single and family coverage and bore higher out-of-pocket costs for deductibles and co-pays. To keep workers at the top of their game, companies are increasingly taking advantage of carrier-sponsored wellness programs -- from weight loss and smoking cessation programs to gym memberships, virtual health coaching, nutrition classes, wellness newsletters and more. Savvy companies are pegging employee contributions to their participation in these initiatives, with financial incentives such as lower premiums and deductibles tied to the attainment of health benchmarks.

 

3. Plan Design. There's nothing like limited resources to inspire creative thinking. Budget-minded employers flocked to high-deductible health plans (HDHP) with health savings accounts (HSA) for cost savings and tax advantages -- namely, the elimination of the "use it or lose it" rule. Others cut costs with HMO deductible plans. Limited medical networks and increasing prescription plan deductibles provided additional avenues for saving money. Expect continued innovation in 2011, as employers focus on new ways to get the most for the money they spend on health plans.

 

4. Communications Game Plan. Confusion and uncertainty among employees over how they and their families will be affected by health care reform led companies to adopt proactive and innovative communication strategies to dispel misperceptions, alleviate fears and prepare workers for the changes to come. From reassuring messages and use of the company intranet to submit basic questions to HR staff to on-site education sessions hosted by brokers, smart employers brought clarity by providing critical information and timely updates. This trend will continue next year as organizations and employees across the country contend with the reality of reform as it continues to evolve.

 

5. Claims Analysis. While it is important to understand the financial performance of a plan and the financial justification of premiums, employers are using claims data to take more focused directions on plan design, wellness initiatives, and communication. The data mining of claims allows employers to weigh the financial costs and member impact of any changes to their plans and helps balance disruption and cost containment. Even a review of a group's top disease states or major diagnostic categories provides focus for wellness initiatives and opportunities to avoid claims, giving employers more control of their health care costs.

 

6. Chronic Disease Management. Alarming rates of chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease are taking their toll on Americans' health and on employers' bottom lines, since companies bear much of the cost associated with treatment. A remarkably positive partnership has developed between companies and employees joining forces to improve their quality of life through health management and wellness programs. These targeted approaches to specific conditions (i.e., glucose levels, blood pressure, and cholesterol) and "knowing your numbers" through health screenings and health risk assessments, help companies stay ahead of the cost curve by offering preventive care to at-risk employees and disease management that encourages healthy lifestyle behaviors in those who receive treatment. Significant future savings in the form of avoided health care costs, reduced benefit and disability premiums, and improved morale, retention and productivity -- plus an overwhelmingly positive response from employees -- mean these programs are here to stay and will likely grow more extensive in years to come.

 

7. Self Funding. Self-funded health care, where the employer assumes the financial risk for benefits claims payments and manages and administers the plan, was an appealing alternative to fully insured plans this year because it reduces costs while improving cash flow. Look for growing interest among all types of employers in this model in 2011. With HCR community rated requirements, employers will be considering alternative funding arrangements to capture their favorable claim costs of their plan participants vs. subsidizing others.

 

8. Product Bundling. Employers capitalized on premium discounts offered by carriers that combine medical plans with comprehensive specialty benefits such as dental, vision, life and disability. With just one team to administer benefits and one premium statement, employers saved money through lower administration fees. Plus, the more employees enrolled and lines of coverage bundled, the greater the savings.

 

9. Going Online. Despite initial reluctance to use the Internet for benefit administration, most employers are jumping on the information superhighway, recognizing not only the willingness of employees across all demographics to use a Web interface, but also how online tools simplify processes for HR departments. Computer-based services such as online enrollment, downloading forms and documents, and access to benefit information and education are among the tech advances coming into daily use, while mobile-enacted information and services for the smartphone platform promise even greater efficiencies in the near future.

 

10. Executive Benefits. Executive benefits, an important tool for attracting and retaining talented staff, were a casualty of the economic downturn and new health care reform legislation, both of which put these programs under greater scrutiny than ever before. Many companies have had to weigh the competitive edge these benefits provide against the costs and risks they entail, and some faced with no choice but to set these policies aside as they struggled to stay afloat in challenging economic times.

 

"Perhaps the most important lesson of 2010 is that getting employees more involved in their medical decisions, expenses and overall health is a key to sustaining a financially viable, work-based benefits program," says Allison. "As for implications for the future, as the economy improves and the job market becomes vital again, companies with robust programs will have a significant advantage in terms of their ability to meet productivity goals and attract and retain desirable employees while they make significant inroads into improving the health of American workers and their families."

 

Obamacare or Not, UnitedHealth Appears Set to Thrive

Seeking Alpha, December 15, 2010

 

The news this week that a federal judge ruled a key portion of the Obama Administration’s healthcare reform legislation to be unconstitutional – the part requiring people to have insurance — might seem to rescue UnitedHealth Group (UNH), the big insurer, which has groused about the high costs of complying with the new law.

 

But the truth is UnitedHealth doesn’t need rescuing, and there is probably as much benefit to the company in healthcare reform as there is harm. U.S. District Court Judge Henry Hudson of Virginia’s ruling may stand or may be thrown out on appeal, but what seems certain is that UnitedHealth and other insurers will profitably adapt. And the recent doubt that has dogged UnitedHealth’s stock presents a buying opportunity to long-term investors.

 

Yes, the company is predicting as much as an 11% decline in earnings per share next year in part because of reform-related changes. But, longer term, investors should consider the company’s diverse mix of businesses. (The company forecasts double-digit EPS growth beginning in 2012.) As for next year: New rules tell insurers to spend a minimum amount on medical expenses (85 cents of every premium dollar from large-employer plans and 80 cents for small business and individuals). The change aims to force insurers to spend more money on things that benefit insured folks rather than on administrative costs, marketing and salaries. Understandably, concerns over health reform’s effects on insurers damped enthusiasm for the stock even as the company was posting profit gains this year. The stock recovered a bit but the shares are still undervalued, according to YCharts Pro.

 

UnitedHealth threw wary investors a bone earlier this year, substantially increasing the company’s dividend to 50 cents a year (in quarterly payouts) from 3 cents. As a result, UnitedHealth has the only respectable dividend yield among the biggest insurers.

 

As for reform, UnitedHealth knows how to deal with adversity. Four years ago, the company’s long-time CEO resigned after a stock options fraud scandal. A terrible economy means fewer people are insured because of lost jobs. And UnitedHealth and rivals were made villains by Obama as the cause for high healthcare costs. Those challenges are in addition to the up-and-down cycles of the insurance industry. And yet, through nine months this year, earnings per share are up 30%.

 

One thing UnitedHealth does well is covers its bets. While employer health plans are big business for the insurer ($10.4 billion in third-quarter revenue), UnitedHealth also sells a lot of supplemental Medicare coverage to seniors ($8.8 billion in quarterly sales). The so-called Medicare Advantage plans were targeted by the president and congressional Democrats, and, going forward, UnitedHealth is going to be limited on the rates it charges seniors for such policies. But UnitedHealth also stands to benefit from millions of Baby Boomers joining the ranks of the Medicare-insured over the next decade. UnitedHealth is even in the Medicaid business; a division that administers Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program for states rose almost 30% in the third quarter to $2.7 billion.

 

Indeed, despite headwinds, UnitedHealth was able to increase revenue steadily in recent years.

 

While premiums sold for employer, government and individual insurance plans account for more than 90% of revenue, UnitedHealth has a number of smaller businesses that can benefit from the new health reform law, including disease management and wellness programs as well as consulting, health data and software businesses for doctors, hospitals and employers.

 

The idea that slow-footed legislators might corral crafty insurers – a notion UnitedHealth and others helped spread with all their complaining – actually seems a little silly.

 

Judge Voids Key Element of Obama Health Care Law

New York Times, December 13, 2010

 

A federal judge in Virginia ruled on Monday that the keystone provision in the Obama health care law is unconstitutional, becoming the first judge to invalidate any part of the sprawling act and ensuring that appellate courts will receive contradictory opinions from below.

 

The judge, Henry E. Hudson of Federal District Court in Richmond, said the law’s requirement that most Americans obtain insurance exceeded the regulatory authority granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause.

 

Judge Hudson, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, declined the plaintiff’s request to suspend the act’s implementation pending appeal, meaning there should be no immediate effect on its rollout.

 

But the ruling seemed likely to create confusion among the public and to further destabilize political support for a law that is under fierce attack from Republicans in Congress and in many statehouses. Party leaders, including the incoming House speaker, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, quickly used the opinion to reiterate their call for repealing the law.

 

In a 42-page opinion, Judge Hudson wrote: “Neither the Supreme Court nor any federal circuit court of appeals has extended Commerce Clause powers to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market.”

 

Allowing Congress to exert such authority, he said, “would invite unbridled exercise of federal police powers.”

 

Compelling vehicle owners to carry accident insurance, as states do, is considered a different matter because the Constitution gives the states broad police powers that have been interpreted to encompass that. Furthermore, there is no statutory requirement that people possess cars, only a requirement that they have insurance as a condition of doing so. By contrast, the plaintiffs in the health care case argue that the new law requires people to obtain health insurance simply because they exist.

 

The insurance mandate is central to the law’s mission of covering more than 30 million people who are uninsured. Insurers argue that only by requiring healthy people to have policies can they afford to pay for those with expensive conditions. But Judge Hudson ruled that many of the law’s other provisions could be severed legally and would survive even if the mandate is invalidated.

 

Judge Hudson is the third district court judge to reach a determination on the merits in one of the two dozen lawsuits challenging the health care law. The other judges, in Detroit and Lynchburg, Va., have upheld the law. Lawyers say the appellate process could last another two years before the Supreme Court settles the dispute.

 

The opinion by Judge Hudson, who has a long history in Republican politics in Northern Virginia, continued a partisan pattern in the health care cases. Thus far, judges appointed by Republican presidents have ruled consistently against the Obama administration, while Democratic appointees have found for it.

 

That has reinforced the notion — fueled by the White House — that the lawsuits are as much a political assault as a constitutional one. The Richmond case was filed by Virginia’s attorney general, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, a Republican, and all but one of the 20 attorneys general and governors who filed a similar case in Pensacola, Fla., are Republicans.

 

The two cases previously decided by district courts are already before the midlevel courts of appeal, with the Detroit case in the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati and the Lynchburg case in the Fourth Circuit in Richmond.

 

The Justice Department, which is defending the statute, is considering whether to appeal Judge Hudson’s ruling to the Fourth Circuit, which hears cases from Virginia and four other states. That would leave that court to consider opposite rulings handed down over two weeks in courthouses situated only 116 miles apart.

 

Administration officials emphasized that Judge Hudson’s opinion was just one among several and said they were pleased he had not stopped the law from going into effect.

 

“We are disappointed in today’s ruling,” said Tracy Schmaler, a Justice Department spokeswoman, “but continue to believe — as other federal courts in Virginia and Michigan have found — that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional.”

 

Ms. Schmaler added, “We are confident that we will ultimately prevail.”

 

The administration acknowledges that if the insurance requirement falls before taking effect in 2014, related changes would necessarily collapse with it, most notably provisions that would prevent insurers from denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions or charging them discriminatory rates.

 

But officials said other innovations, including a vast expansion of Medicaid eligibility and the sale of subsidized insurance policies through state-based exchanges, would withstand even a Supreme Court ruling against the insurance mandate.

 

Some state officials said Monday’s ruling would reinforce calls by many Republican governors and lawmakers to slow down its implementation.

 

“I think you might see some air taken out of the balloon nationwide,” said Jason A. Helgerson, the Medicaid director in Wisconsin, where Republicans are about to take control of both the executive and legislative branches.

 

Judge Hudson, who was previously best known for sentencing the N.F.L. quarterback Michael Vick to 23 months for his involvement in a dog fighting ring, had telegraphed his leanings in a series of hearings and preliminary opinions. But the ruling was nonetheless striking given that only nine months ago, prominent law professors were dismissing the constitutional claims as just north of frivolous.

 

The case centers on whether Congress can use its powers under the Commerce Clause to compel citizens to buy a commercial product — namely health insurance — for the purpose of regulating an interstate economic market. Absent that authority, the administration argued, Congress could use the taxation powers granted by the Constitution to justify the insurance requirement, because the fine for not obtaining coverage will be assessed as an income tax penalty.

 

While commending Congress’s “laudable intentions,” Judge Hudson shot down both arguments.

 

“At its core,” he wrote, “this dispute is not simply about regulating the business of insurance — or crafting a scheme of universal health insurance coverage — it’s about an individual’s right to choose to participate.”

 

The ruling is a political score for Mr. Cuccinelli, who filed the lawsuit on his own rather than joining the Pensacola case. It upstages a major hearing in Florida scheduled for Thursday.

 

“This case is not about health insurance, it is not about health care,” Mr. Cuccinelli said at a news conference in Richmond. “It is about liberty.”

 

Mr. Cuccinelli, who was elected in 2009, said he had filed on his own because Virginia passed a law this year aimed at nullifying the federal insurance requirement, giving the commonwealth a distinct constitutional claim. Others attribute the strategy to political ambition, suggesting that Mr. Cuccinelli did not want to share the spotlight and knew he could exploit the accelerated pace of judging in Richmond’s so-called “rocket docket” to raise his profile.

 

Mr. Cuccinelli filed the lawsuit minutes after President Obama signed the law on March 23 and has been discussing the case on cable television ever since. By late afternoon Monday, he had already posted campaign fund-raising advertisements online that cited his victory.

 

Even before Monday’s ruling, Mr. Cuccinelli and Gov. Bob McDonnell of Virginia, also a Republican, were seeking an agreement with the Justice Department to bypass the United States Circuit Court of Appeals and file for expedited review by the Supreme Court. That would have the effect of further marginalizing the Pensacola case. The Supreme Court rarely takes such requests, and the Justice Department has not publicly expressed an opinion.

 

Legacy of Elizabeth Edwards includes frank talk about health

MarketWatch, December 7, 2010

 

It’s hard to find a public figure as candid and compelling as Elizabeth Edwards, a lawyer and health-reform advocate best known as the estranged wife of former Democratic vice-presidential nominee John Edwards. She died Tuesday morning at her home in Chapel Hill, N.C., only a day after announcing her decision to end cancer treatment on doctors’ advice that it wouldn’t be productive, according to a family statement. She was 61 years old.

 

Edwards first got confirmation she had breast cancer hours after her husband and Sen. John Kerry conceded the 2004 presidential election to George W. Bush. Then in March of 2007, she announced, with John Edwards by her side, that a coincidental X-ray of a cracked rib had revealed the cancer had spread to her bones. She was upbeat but realistic in acknowledging that she faced a terminal illness. She said she was going to continue treatment and continue doing the things she always did. She and John said they agreed they didn’t want her condition to stop his campaign to be the Democratic nominee for president in 2008.

 

John Edwards dropped out of the primary race in January of 2008 after putting out the first and perhaps most stringent health-care proposal of the three major candidates, the others being Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama . Two months later, Elizabeth Edwards appeared as a guest speaker at the Association of Health Care Journalists’ annual meeting, held in Washington, D.C. that year. She blasted Sen. John McCain, then the presumed Republican nominee for president, for creating a health-reform proposal that didn’t require insurers to cover people with preexisting health conditions — people like Elizabeth Edwards (breast cancer) and John McCain himself (skin cancer.) She put McCain on the defensive and challenged his ideas at a time when people who previously hadn’t had to pay attention to the sometimes complicated debate were suffering from fewer coverage options and escalating health costs.

 

Many people drew inspiration from Elizabeth Edwards even though she raised questions about how much she knew and whether she had an obligation to disclose it when revelations about her husband’s extramarital affair began to surface in 2008. Earlier this year, John Edwards finally admitted to fathering a child with a former campaign videographer. Elizabeth Edwards wrote about her family and health crises in two books, “Saving Graces” and “Resilience.”

 

The public largely sympathized with Elizabeth’s plight and identified with her will to survive. She and John Edwards had endured the loss of their 16-year-old son Wade in 1996.  They went on to have two more children when Elizabeth was age 48 and 50, and she said in recent interviews that her young children were her first concern in trying to survive her cancer diagnosis.

 

Recent research suggests that starting palliative care early — at the time of diagnosis — can actually prolong life and not just increase its quality. That doesn’t mean you have to give up on aggressive treatments, and it sounds like Elizabeth Edwards went that route as long as she could and as long as that made sense to her. Maybe her life and death will usher in a new era of frank talk about what end-of-life care can be when people have grown-up conversations about the trade-offs of various approaches.

 

Value-based insurance design's pros and cons

The Washington Post, November 29, 2010

 

What if, instead of you making a $10 insurance co-payment for your cholesterol-lowering drug, your employer provided it - and other drugs to manage chronic conditions - for free? What if your company also paid for weight-management and smoking-cessation classes? You'd probably give your employer high marks for looking out for your health.

 

Now, what if your employer said that if you want certain procedures that it believes to be overused, such as an MRI scan or knee surgery, you'll have to pay $500 extra? Those employer decisions might not be nearly as welcome.

 

Both, however, are part of an approach to health care that shares a common perspective: the idea that consumers' out-of-pocket medical costs should be based on the value of a service to their health rather than its price.

 

Although relatively rare, the model is garnering increasing attention among employers, insurers and policy experts. Mercer, a benefits consulting company, found in a 2008 survey that 19 percent of employers with at least 500 employees were charging workers less for services the companies considered to have a higher value for workers' health. In addition, more than 80 percent of employers with at least 10,000 workers surveyed by Mercer in 2007 said they were interested in adopting this model in the next five years, according to a paper published in the November issue of Health Affairs. It was one of several on value-based insurance design, as it's called, in that issue.

 

Some provisions of this year's health-care overhaul also embrace value-based insurance principles, including the requirement that new insurance policies provide free recommended preventive services such as mammograms and colon cancer screenings starting this fall.

 

"It's all in keeping with the idea that some things are so valuable to health care that there should be no barriers to their use," says Niteesh Choudhry, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and lead author of two of the Health Affairs articles.

 

A landmark 1982 study showed that consumers spend less on health care as their out-of-pocket costs rise. But they scrimp not just on care that's ineffective or unnecessary but also on care they need, treatment that's highly effective at addressing their condition.

 

Mike Hardy had a heart attack during the lunch hour at his job at office products and services supplier Pitney Bowes nearly three years ago. The 65-year-old e-commerce manager says he was surprised to learn that the medications he needed post-heart attack - including the statin Lipitor, blood-clot preventer Plavix, a beta blocker and an ACE inhibitor to control his blood pressure - were all provided to him free. Smoothing the way even further, staff at the medical clinic at the company's Stamford, Conn., headquarters wrote prescriptions for him and the on-site pharmacy delivered the drugs to his office. "Zero barriers does make a difference," he says.

 

Pitney Bowes is an old hand at value-based benefit design. Since 2001, the company has been providing drugs to treat employees' heart disease, asthma, diabetes and high blood pressure, among other things, free or at reduced cost.

 

The pharmacy plan works in tandem with comprehensive disease management and wellness programs to help employees prevent and manage chronic conditions, says Brent Pawlecki, medical director for Pitney Bowes.

 

Indeed, experts agree that eliminating financial barriers isn't enough to ensure that people stick with their medication regimens, get necessary preventive screenings and seek high-value medical care. Health coaching and other support services are also critical, says Eric Grossman, a senior partner at Mercer.

 

So far, nearly all employers and insurers that have adopted value-based insurance benefits have done so by dangling the promise of free or cheaper benefits. But such an approach is unlikely to reduce overall health-care spending, say some experts. In fact, it may actually increase it, as employees get the care they might have otherwise skipped.

 

To reduce costs, some experts say employers and insurers should use a stick in addition to the carrot, with financial disincentives that might discourage people from using medical services that are considered low value.

 

In October, 155,000 Oregon public education employees and their dependents began to experience this stick approach. Their plans already offered carrots: free preventive care and low-cost or free generic drugs for chronic conditions.

 

But members are now being charged an extra $500 if they get services that the state Educators Benefit Board has determined are overused or "preference-sensitive" to patient choice, including spinal surgery, knee and shoulder arthroscopy, hip and knee replacement and upper endoscopy exams. Patients will pay an extra $100 for advanced imaging tests and sleep studies.

 

"We explained that the reason the rates were going up was because people were using the benefits a lot," says Joan Kapowich, administrator for the boards.

 

The board showed employees, for example, that nationwide the average amount spent on sleep studies was 37 cents a year. In the Oregon state plans, however, it was a whopping $7.36. "Everybody who snores was getting a sleep study," she says.

 

It's too soon to know whether the new approach will be successful at improving employees' health or bringing down health-care spending. But one researcher says she thinks workers may be more open to the idea than might be expected.

 

People are willing to compromise, says Marge Ginsburg, executive director of the Center for Healthcare Decisions, a Sacramento-based nonprofit that studies how consumers make health care choices. They're open to "the idea that yes, it's still available to you, but it's going to cost you more," she says.

 

Outright denials, on the other hand, don't sit so well. "People are really unhappy if you draw a line in the sand."

 

Health plans wonder about their role in ACOs

Amednews, November 29, 2010

 

Accountable care organizations are defined slightly differently depending on the source, but generally involve a combination of physicians and hospitals taking responsibility for a defined population, working together to improve care and cutting costs.

 

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is working on rules for ACOs that will determine exactly what clinical and financial benchmarks will quality ACOs for additonal payments. Under the health reform law, to be recognized by Medicare as an ACO, the organization must exist for a minimum of three years and serve at least 5,000 patients. Generally, all the participants share in the savings created, but models differ in how that happens. Physicians and hospitals do not need formal business affiliations with each other before forming an ACO.

 

As the "silly season" peaked during the last few months and the first pilots got running, the potential pitfalls and practical conundrums emerged. At the November AHIP meeting, insurance company executives talked through some of them.

 

Though ACOs are primarily defined as cooperative agreements between hospitals and physicians, health plans are keenly interested in the model and need to keep on top of developments because they will be the ones to reimburse the new entities for care.

 

Stephanie Kanwit, a former Federal Trade Commission attorney and a former general counsel for AHIP who is now a private consultant, moderated two conference sessions on ACOs. She listed several reasons why health plans will and should be involved in ACO development.

 

Health plans can track the health of large populations. They have the information technology infrastructure to help monitor the health of patients enrolled with an ACO. They are experts in managing networks like those used in an ACO. They can carry the financial risk that allows an ACO to move forward. And they are experienced in developing multiple insurance products for patients.

 

So, in one sense, plans have the expertise on hand to make ACOs work.

 

On the other hand, as Bruce Bagley, MD, medical director for quality improvement for the American Academy of Family Physicians, said, "There are probably no experts about ACOs. It's a developing concept."

Regulations coming

 

As of this article's deadline, Medicare was preparing to release its ACO regulations, as required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services plans to start the ACO three-year demonstration projects in January 2012.

 

Meanwhile, private plans, including Humana and Cigna, are piloting ACOs in the first forays for the industry. In each case, the plans joined with certain physicians and hospitals to provide care for the plans' members under the ACO. Physicians and hospitals would be paid on a fee-for-service basis but have a chance for extra money based on quality measures.

 

Health insurance companies are trying to figure out where they fit in with accountable care organizations.

 

Executives gathered for trade group America's Health Insurance Plans' annual fall forum in Chicago Nov. 8-10, in the middle of what session moderator and Health Affairs editor Susan Dentzer called "the silly season" for accountable care organizations.But health plans also have some trepidation about ACOs.

 

Joining physicians and hospitals in an ACO creates the opportunity and pressure for the two groups to merge, experts said at the AHIP conference. In that way, pushing the ACO model could end up creating highly concentrated hospital and physician markets in which the large ACO groups can demand higher payments.

 

Jeff Goldsmith, PhD, a University of Virginia professor of public health sciences and president of Health Futures Inc., criticized ACOs as he addressed a standing-room-only audience at the AHIP meeting. He believes the ACO model will be bad for both physicians and health plans, in part because the way it is usually described doesn't eliminate fee-for-service payments or transfer financial risk to physicians or hospitals.

 

"I just think this is a stupid idea," he told the audience. "Managed care without the risk -- that's like gin and tonic without the gin. How do you end up making choices if you're not forced to make them?"

 

He thinks hospitals and physicians will have a hard time working together. "What aligning incentives means to hospital executives is: You work for me, and we'll do what I tell you to do," Goldsmith said.

 

In another ACO-focused session, Mary Ella Payne, vice president of System Legislative Leadership for Ascension Health, the largest nonprofit hospital system in the country, talked about how her system is approaching the ACO idea. Ascension, based in St. Louis, runs 70 hospitals in 20 states and has 30,000 affiliated physicians.

 

Ascension physicians and nurse leaders met in June and agreed that the status quo, fee-for-service system is unsustainable, Payne said. Even in the absence of a health reform bill pushing the idea, ACOs make sense, she said.

 

"Regardless of what happens with the big picture, we feel like we need to move ahead with reforming our delivery system," she said. "We felt we needed to do this because it's the right way to manage care for our patients."

 

 

.

 

 

Standing Up for Quality and Affordable Health Care Kathleen Sebelious, Secretary of Health and Human Servicies, November 12, 2010

 

This week, I had the opportunity to meet with consumer advocacy organizations from around the country that are working on the front lines every day on behalf of individuals and families as they seek quality, affordable health care.

 

As we implement the Affordable Care Act, we are working closely with States to help consumers take more control over their health care. Already, the Affordable Care Act is helping States to crack down on unreasonable premium increases, provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, help consumers navigate their options and understand their rights, and lay the groundwork for state-based marketplaces where families and small businesses will be able to obtain coverage. These are just a few of the key areas where States are playing an essential role in helping to implement the Affordable Care Act.

 

Consumer organizations also play an important role in helping individuals and families better understand the benefits and opportunities available to them in the communities in which they live. And that’s why it is so important to receive feedback from those who are on the ground each day in the States, advocating on behalf of consumers.

 

On Wednesday, I met with representatives from:

 

Community Catalyst

Families USA

Health Care for All (MA)

TakeAction Minnesota (MN)

Center for Public Policy Priorities (TX)

Florida CHAIN (FL)

NJ Citizen Action (NJ)

Health Access California (CA)

Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis (VA)

 

Many of these consumer groups are long time advocates for the new rights, benefits and protections that are kicking in under the Affordable Care Act. Already, young adults are able to stay on their parents coverage until age 26, businesses are getting help providing their employees and early retirees with health coverage, and insurers are prohibited from denying coverage to children because of a pre-existing health condition or dropping coverage for Americans when they get sick just because they made an unintentional mistake on their paperwork. These protections end some of the worst health insurance industry abuses, and families across the nation are benefiting.

 

During our meeting, we also discussed the new options available to consumers under the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan. People who are uninsured for at least six months because of a pre-existing condition are eligible for coverage through new Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plans, and the new options will give current and future enrollees a greater number of coverage choices and allow people to select the plan that best meets their needs.

 

Another big item on the horizon is this year’s Medicare Open Enrollment period, which begins next week on November 15 and is a key opportunity for our seniors to gain important new benefits. As a result of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare is getting stronger.

 

The Open Enrollment period is an opportunity for seniors to begin comparing their current coverage and needs to the options available next year. The Affordable Care Act provides new benefits in 2011, including a 50% discount on brand name drugs if you hit the donut hole, a free annual wellness visit and no co-pays for recommended preventive services for most people with Medicare. (People with Medicare can learn more by reading their 2011 Medicare & You Handbook, the most important and reliable tool available. Updated information is now available at www.medicare.gov and by calling 1-800-MEDICARE.)

 

There’s a lot to do to get out the word on all these important milestones, and I look forward to continuing to work with the extraordinary organizations that support our efforts throughout the country to enable consumers to gain more control over their health care.

 

CareFirst will recognize nurse practitioners as primary caregivers

FierceHealthcare, November 8, 2010

 

While members of the AMA may have their doubts about whether nurses are up to the task of serving as primary-care providers, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield of Baltimore apparently has no such qualms. An announcement made by the insurer last Friday that nurse practitioners will be allowed to serve in an independent primary-care capacity means that patients in Maryland, Northern Virginia and Washington, D.C., no longer will be limited to seeing primary-care doctors for everyday care. "When you look at the projection of the shortage of physicians...nurse practitioners may be very important to the future needs of growing communities," Jennifer Teeter, assistant vice president of payer contracting for Frederick (Md.) Memorial Healthcare System, told Gazette.Net.

The announcement is the culmination of a collaboration between the Maryland Coalition of Nurse Practitioners, the Nurse Practitioner Association of Maryland and CareFirst to expand coverage in the wake of both the new health reform law and the physician shortage plaguing the U.S. Bruce Edwards, CareFirst senior vp for networks management, added in a press release that the insurer aims to increase its emphasis on primary care through its Primary Care Medical Home Program (PCMH), set to begin this January. "With these developments ahead and an existing need to expand access to these services, allowing nurse practitioners to practice independently as primary-care providers is a logical move to serve our members better," Edwards said.

In response to CareFirst's announcement, Gary Simmons, vice president with UnitedHealthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, said that his company also was looking into the nurse-practitioner-as-primary-caregiver option.

 

Bending The Health Care Cost Curve: Pay-For-Results Insurance

The Fiscal Times, November 2, 2010

 

Here’s a health care reform idea that proponents say will bring Republicans and Democrats together: Make people pay more for high-priced medical interventions that may not be necessary or simply don’t deliver results. Though it seems like an idea that can be easily attacked as just another scheme to ration care, the reform – called value-based insurance design – couples the Republican principles of market-based incentives and consumer choice with the Democratic reformers’ goal of eliminating costly and unnecessary care.

They’re giving it a shot in Oregon, a blue state where public employees and teachers next year will pay an extra $500 out of pocket when they get back surgery, an endoscopy, or an artificial knee, hip or shoulder. The state benefits board also slapped large co-pays on sleep studies and MRI and CT scan images in certain situations that were deemed “low-value.” The idea is to dissuade people who don’t really need the procedures from purchasing them.

 

To Save Money, Save the Health Care Act

New York Times,  November 3, 2010

 

In the name of fiscal probity, the incoming Republican leadership in Congress has committed to doing whatever it takes to stop the health care reform act from taking effect. Yet many of the provisions that politicians have been taking aim at are the ones that save money — like those that reduce excessive provider payments and create new institutions to curb cost growth.

If the newly elected representatives and senators are truly concerned about rising health care costs, they should work to deploy the law’s cost-containment measures fully rather than try to repeal them. Sure, the health care law is not perfect, but it would cut the nation’s long-term fiscal imbalance by a quarter and reduce the projected deficit within Medicare by three-quarters. That may seem fanciful, given how distorted the public discussion has become. But that’s what the projections show, as long as Congress sticks to its guns and the Obama administration does a good job carrying out the provisions of the law.

Why do so many people assume that the act does almost nothing to save money? One explanation is that people’s first impressions of health care reform were formed during the summer of 2009, when the debate was dominated by the House bill. In health care reform, there’s always an underlying tension between those who are more concerned about expanding coverage and those who are more concerned about containing costs and improving quality. The House bill tilted toward coverage; the Senate bill, toward cost-effectiveness and quality. The House bill was legitimately criticized for not doing enough to reduce costs. And that became the prism through which the legislation was and is viewed, even after improvements were later made in the Senate version and in the final law.

The act’s money-saving potential has also been clouded by an essential truth about controlling costs: it’s messy.

There are four ways to contain health care costs: by reducing payments to providers and suppliers; by rationing services; by having consumers pay a greater share; and by giving providers incentives to be more efficient.

The health care reform act includes hundreds of billions of dollars worth of cuts in payments to providers. Lowering payments within Medicare, though, without also reducing the quantity of services provided throughout the health care system ultimately only makes it harder for those on Medicare to find a doctor or hospital willing to treat them, because so many providers stop seeing Medicare patients.

The growth in health care services could be reduced by denying access to specific procedures. But even if such rationing were desirable, which is debatable, it is not remotely politically viable.

The third way to contain the expansion of health care services, theoretically, is to give consumers more “skin in the game” by increasing their share of the bill. There is no doubt that consumers would become more cost-conscious if they had to pay more. But this would not save that much money, because it would not apply to high-cost procedures. After all, the whole point of insurance is generous protection against unavoidable high costs. And the high-cost cases account for the vast majority of health care expenses: In 2001, the top 25 percent of Medicare beneficiaries ranked by cost accounted for 85 percent of all Medicare costs. Lowering total health care expenses requires addressing the factors that drive those high-cost cases. For the most part, they involve chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension and congestive heart failure, whose treatment varies much more than you’d think from doctor to doctor

 

Milliman Group Health Insurance Survey Indicates Average 2011 Rate Increases of 10.2% for HMOs, 11.7% for PPOs

PRNewswire, October 29, 2010

 

 

Results from Milliman's 2010 Group Health Insurance Survey indicate estimated premium rate increases for January 2011 renewals will average 10.2% for Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and 11.7% for Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs).  In addition to typical rate increases due to utilization and cost experience, these planned increases also likely reflect some change due to implementing the requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

 

The reported annual historical increase in premium rates (July 2010 versus July 2009 assuming no changes in benefit or cost-sharing levels) was 10.9% for HMOs and 11.7% to 12.0% for PPOs. The PPO results were compiled for a standard plan and a high-deductible plan, respectively.  Commercial insurers experienced a median 1.1% pretax profit as a percent of premium in 2009.

 

The Milliman survey is unique in that it asks HMOs and PPOs to respond regarding a given set of group health benefits and demographics.  The survey removes three important factors that can skew the results presented in other health cost surveys: changes in plan design, shifts in premium sharing between employer and employee, and member demographics.  These trends, therefore, reflect the increase in medical utilization and costs experienced/anticipated by the HMOs and PPOs.

 

This year's survey also asked insurers what provider contracting changes and cost saving initiatives they are considering making due to the PPACA. Insurers generally plan to utilize more quality incentive programs, introduce more shared risk with their provider networks, provide more price transparency for members, more aggressively tier provider networks, and reduce broker commissions.  Almost all report they are preparing to participate in the PPACA insurance exchanges in 2014.

 

The 2010 report includes premium rates, trends for medical and prescription drug coverage, prescription drug costs, views toward recent health care reform legislation, and progress toward implementing ICD-10 coding per survey responses.  Milliman also provides hospital inpatient cost and utilization data, physician reimbursement levels, medical expense ratios, and profit levels from Milliman's available databases.  Results are provided by metropolitan area, state, region and nationwide, and are shown separately for HMOs and PPOs when possible.

 

This marks the seventeenth year that Milliman has conducted the survey.  The survey was sent to HMOs and fully insured PPOs that serve the nation's commercial, large and mid-group employer market.  Over 60 insurers participated representing a total enrollment of about one hundred million members.  Please visit http://www.milliman.com/expertise/healthcare/pro ducts-tools/group-health-insurance-survey/index.php to order the full survey or contact Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson ( jeremy.engdahl-johnson@milliman.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , 646.473.3021) to request a copy of the press version.

 

About Milliman

 

Milliman is among the world's largest independent actuarial and consulting firms.  Founded in Seattle in 1947 as Milliman & Robertson, the company currently has 53 offices in key locations worldwide.  Milliman employs more than 2,400 people.  The firm has consulting practices in healthcare, employee benefits, property & casualty insurance, life insurance and financial services.  Milliman serves the full spectrum of business, financial, government, union, education and nonprofit organizations.  For further information, visit www.milliman.com.

 

 

Read more: Milliman Group Health Insurance Survey Indicates Average 2011 Rate Increases of 10.2% for HMOs, 11.7% for PPOs - FierceHealthcare http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/press-releases/milliman-group-health-insurance-survey-indicates-average-2011-rate-increases-102-hmos#ixzz144uQi7vJ

Subscribe: http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/signup?sourcefor m=Viral-Tynt-FierceHealthcare-FierceHealthcare

 

BUSINESS

CLINICAL

LEGAL

Verden Editorial